You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openoffice.apache.org by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de> on 2013/06/08 19:37:15 UTC

[DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to 
apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version, 
new directory + filename structure).

If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast 
as the time is running.



1. I'm working with the following directory structure:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/



2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
(especially @Juergen + Ariel)

aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg

Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe



3.
I'm testing with my Apache people account:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...

However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like 
the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download

http://www.apache.org/dist/
aoo/
4.0.0/
binaries/
en-US/
Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5

http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
aoo/
4.0.0/
source/
aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2



Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 1:08 PM, Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:

> I've updated the test area in staging:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html>
>
> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, de
> languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it might be
> just a missing language. ;-)
> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>
> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**analyze.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html>
>
> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marcus
>

Good for me! :) Got everything right!


thanks for all your work!


>
>
>
> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>
>  I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>> new directory + filename structure).
>>
>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>> as the time is running.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_**Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.**gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.**gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.**gz
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_install_en-US.dmg
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_install_en-US.exe
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.
>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|**binaries]/.<http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/%5Bsource%7Cbinaries%5D/.>
>> ..
>>
>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>> the following:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/>
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> binaries/
>> en-US/
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>> gz/download
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> binaries/
>> en-US/
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**gz.md5
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-**closer.cgi/<http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/>
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> source/
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<de...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
                             -- Leonard Peltier

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Kay Schenk <ka...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Jun 9, 2013 at 3:17 AM, Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:

> Am 06/09/2013 11:00 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>
>  Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>>
>>> Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>>
>>>> * Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline
>>>>
>>> Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?
>>>
>>
>> No, this would mix stable and unstable version information and we are
>> already quite paranoid on not linking unstable builds... So I would just
>> rename the link to "Release History" and keep it as it is.
>>
>
> The link points to the schedule, not to the wiki for downloading snapshot
> builds. And I don't see any cross link to it.
>
>
>  * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
>>>> consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
>>>> recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to
>>>> extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.
>>>>
>>> Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak
>>> about "Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries" and delete the
>>> link in the nav sidebar.
>>>
>>
>> Updating the blue box is OK. And for the right sidebar, I don't see a
>> risk with duplication, a lot of stuff is already duplicated: we can even
>> leave it as it and link "Dictionaries" to
>> http://extensions.openoffice.**org <http://extensions.openoffice.org> ;
>>
>
> OK, updated.
>
>
> > the important part is to avoid that
>
>> users are driven to a totally outdated page recommending now deprecated
>> and obsolete features like DicOOo.
>>
>
> What about the link to the building guide? I've lost the overview where
> the best data is.
>

The Build Guide link you have seems OK to me.


>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> ------------------------------**------------------------------**---------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.**apache.org<de...@openoffice.apache.org>
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>


-- 
----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
MzK

"You can't believe one thing and do another.
 What you believe and what you do are the same thing."
                             -- Leonard Peltier

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 06/09/2013 11:00 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>>> * Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline
>> Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?
>
> No, this would mix stable and unstable version information and we are
> already quite paranoid on not linking unstable builds... So I would just
> rename the link to "Release History" and keep it as it is.

The link points to the schedule, not to the wiki for downloading 
snapshot builds. And I don't see any cross link to it.

>>> * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
>>> consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
>>> recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to
>>> extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.
>> Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak
>> about "Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries" and delete the
>> link in the nav sidebar.
>
> Updating the blue box is OK. And for the right sidebar, I don't see a
> risk with duplication, a lot of stuff is already duplicated: we can even
> leave it as it and link "Dictionaries" to
> http://extensions.openoffice.org ;

OK, updated.

 > the important part is to avoid that
> users are driven to a totally outdated page recommending now deprecated
> and obsolete features like DicOOo.

What about the link to the building guide? I've lost the overview where 
the best data is.

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
>> * Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline
> Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?

No, this would mix stable and unstable version information and we are 
already quite paranoid on not linking unstable builds... So I would just 
rename the link to "Release History" and keep it as it is.

>> * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
>> consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
>> recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to
>> extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.
> Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak
> about "Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries" and delete the
> link in the nav sidebar.

Updating the blue box is OK. And for the right sidebar, I don't see a 
risk with duplication, a lot of stuff is already duplicated: we can even 
leave it as it and link "Dictionaries" to 
http://extensions.openoffice.org ; the important part is to avoid that 
users are driven to a totally outdated page recommending now deprecated 
and obsolete features like DicOOo.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 06/09/2013 12:18 AM, schrieb Andrea Pescetti:
> Marcus (OOo) wrote:
>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>
> There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest
> looks very good:
> * Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline

Right. Wouldn't it then be better to point to the new schedule?

> * Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently
> consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd
> recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to
> extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.

Then it's IMHO better to extend the link in the light blue box to speak 
about "Get Apache OpenOffice Extensions and Dictionaries" and delete the 
link in the nav sidebar.

I've concentrated on the DL links. Thanks for looking right and left. ;-)
Updated.

>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>
> Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place
> there. But it is just a matter of preference.

Yes, me too. However, we had this discussion last year and some wanted 
to have SDK on the same level as the languages.

Because we save one complexity level I can live with this very well.

We shouldn't forget that this is just the structure on the mirrors. 
Nearly nobody will see or take care about this. ;-)

>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>
> Since this is our most "official" package, I would name it
> apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
> or
> Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
> if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I
> would prefer to see both "Apache" and "OpenOffice" present in full in
> the package name.

Good idea.

@Juergen:
As you are producing the source packages, please can you take this into 
account?

Thanks

Marcus


---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Andrea Pescetti <pe...@apache.org>.
Marcus (OOo) wrote:
> I've updated the test area in staging:
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

There are a couple of links in the sidebar to be improved, the rest 
looks very good:
* Release Schedule is actually a "Release History", or timeline
* Dictionaries leads to a totally outdated section. We recently 
consolidated all dictionaries in extensions.openoffice.org , so I'd 
recommend a link "Extensions and Dictionaries" pointing to 
extensions.openoffice.org instead of two separate links.

>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/

Very personal opinion: SDK is not a language and feels out of place 
there. But it is just a matter of preference.

>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

Since this is our most "official" package, I would name it
apache-openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
or
Apache_Openoffice-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
if we want to use the same naming pattern we use for binaries. Anyway, I 
would prefer to see both "Apache" and "OpenOffice" present in full in 
the package name.

Regards,
   Andrea.

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 07/08/2013 04:17 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> Marcus I need your SourceForge account to provide you with admin
> priviliges, I couldn't find any account associated with your email address.

sent again via PM.

Thanks for your help.

Marcus



> 2013/7/5 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>
>
>> Am 06/28/2013 10:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>
>>   Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>
>>>> 2013/6/28 Rob Weir<ro...@apache.org>
>>>>
>>>>   On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>   Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mirror
>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.**
>>>>>>>>>> 0/binaries/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> <LANG>/<file_name>
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> mirror:
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.<http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.>
>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can do that in few ways:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it,
>>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>>> would be fine;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>>>>>>>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible
>>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>>> normal file browsing;
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
>>>>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
>>>>>>>> weekend.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
>>>>>>> staged directory method are that:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
>>>>>>> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
>>>>>>> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
>>>>>>> admin, deletion, etc.).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
>>>>>>> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
>>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new
>>>>>>
>>>>> directory.
>>>>>
>>>>>> I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or
>>>>>>
>>>>> am I
>>>>>
>>>>>> on a wrong way?
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>   I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
>>>> SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK, done by PM.
>>>
>>
>> When you can help me for the weekend, then I try something.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   BTW:
>>>>>> Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure
>>>>>> with
>>>>>> AOO 4?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> So, the old ones, e.g.:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>   http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
>>>>> files/localized/de/3.4.1/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>> and
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
>>>>>> files/stable/3.4.1/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep
>>>>>>
>>>>> it
>>>>>
>>>>>> simple and reduced complexity:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>> Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
>>>> reason.
>>>>
>>>
>>> OK
>>>
>>>   I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged? Or is the
>>>>> plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the
>>> archive.
>>>
>>>   My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.
>>>>
>>>> The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
>>>> per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
>>>> from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
>>>> their total download count shouldn't change.
>>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>   PS:
>>>>>>>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> start
>>>>>
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>>> download?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL. If it's not, it
>>>>>>>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>>>>>>>>> it to the URL.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download
>>>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>   Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>   I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
>>>>>>>>>>> en-GB,
>>>>>>>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see
>>>>>>>>>>> errors it
>>>>>>>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**analyze.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> scripting
>>>>>
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new
>>>>>>>>>>>> version,
>>>>>>>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should
>>>>>>>>>>>> do it
>>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>>>>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_**Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|**
>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries]/.<http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/%5Bsource%7Cbinaries%5D/.>
>>>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will
>>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>   Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>> gz/download
>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>>> gz.md5
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-**closer.cgi/<http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/>
>>>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>>> source/
>>>>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
Marcus I need your SourceForge account to provide you with admin
priviliges, I couldn't find any account associated with your email address.

Roberto


2013/7/5 Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de>

> Am 06/28/2013 10:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>
>  Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>
>>> 2013/6/28 Rob Weir<ro...@apache.org>
>>>
>>>  On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>>
>>>>>  2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>  Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mirror
>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.**
>>>>>>>>> 0/binaries/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> <LANG>/<file_name>
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> mirror:
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.<http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/.>
>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can do that in few ways:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it,
>>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>>> would be fine;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>>>>>>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible
>>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>>> normal file browsing;
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
>>>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
>>>>>>> weekend.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
>>>>>> staged directory method are that:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
>>>>>> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
>>>>>> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
>>>>>> admin, deletion, etc.).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
>>>>>> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
>>>>>> you.
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new
>>>>>
>>>> directory.
>>>>
>>>>> I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or
>>>>>
>>>> am I
>>>>
>>>>> on a wrong way?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>  I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
>>> SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.
>>>
>>
>> OK, done by PM.
>>
>
> When you can help me for the weekend, then I try something.
>
> Thanks
>
>
>
>
>  BTW:
>>>>> Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure
>>>>> with
>>>>> AOO 4?
>>>>>
>>>>> So, the old ones, e.g.:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>  http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
>>>> files/localized/de/3.4.1/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>> and
>>>>>
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/**
>>>>> files/stable/3.4.1/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep
>>>>>
>>>> it
>>>>
>>>>> simple and reduced complexity:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>> Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
>>> reason.
>>>
>>
>> OK
>>
>>  I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged? Or is the
>>>> plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?
>>>>
>>>
>> At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the
>> archive.
>>
>>  My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.
>>>
>>> The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
>>> per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
>>> from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
>>> their total download count shouldn't change.
>>>
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>  PS:
>>>>>>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> start
>>>>
>>>>> the
>>>>>>>>> download?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL. If it's not, it
>>>>>>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>>>>>>>> it to the URL.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download
>>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>  Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>  I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**index.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
>>>>>>>>>> en-GB,
>>>>>>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see
>>>>>>>>>> errors it
>>>>>>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>>>>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.**apache.org/download/test/**analyze.html<http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> scripting
>>>>
>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new
>>>>>>>>>>> version,
>>>>>>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should
>>>>>>>>>>> do it
>>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>>>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_**Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>> gz
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_**x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_**x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~**marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|**
>>>>>>>>>>> binaries]/.<http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/%5Bsource%7Cbinaries%5D/.>
>>>>>>>>>>> ..
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will
>>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/**projects/openofficeorg.mirror/<http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/>
>>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>  Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>> gz/download
>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_**x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.**
>>>>>>>>>>> gz.md5
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-**closer.cgi/<http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/>
>>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>>> source/
>>>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.**bz2
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 06/28/2013 10:35 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>> 2013/6/28 Rob Weir<ro...@apache.org>
>>
>>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>
>>> wrote:
>>>> Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>
>>>>> 2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge
>>> mirror
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/
>>> <LANG>/<file_name>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the
>>> mirror:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can do that in few ways:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it,
>>>>>>> that
>>>>>>> would be fine;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>>>>>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible
>>>>>>> during
>>>>>>> normal file browsing;
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
>>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
>>>>>> weekend.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
>>>>> staged directory method are that:
>>>>>
>>>>> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
>>>>> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
>>>>> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
>>>>> admin, deletion, etc.).
>>>>>
>>>>> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
>>>>> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
>>>>> you.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new
>>> directory.
>>>> I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or
>>> am I
>>>> on a wrong way?
>>>
>>>
>> I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
>> SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.
>
> OK, done by PM.

When you can help me for the weekend, then I try something.

Thanks



>>>> BTW:
>>>> Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure
>>>> with
>>>> AOO 4?
>>>>
>>>> So, the old ones, e.g.:
>>>>
>>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/
>>>
>>>>
>>>> and
>>>>
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep
>>> it
>>>> simple and reduced complexity:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>
>>
>> Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
>> reason.
>
> OK
>
>>> I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged? Or is the
>>> plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?
>
> At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the archive.
>
>> My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.
>>
>> The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
>> per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
>> from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
>> their total download count shouldn't change.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>>>>>>> PS:
>>>>>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to
>>> start
>>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>>> download?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL. If it's not, it
>>>>>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>>>>>>> it to the URL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download
>>>>>> URL.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
>>>>>>>>> en-GB,
>>>>>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see
>>>>>>>>> errors it
>>>>>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>>>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download
>>> scripting
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new
>>>>>>>>>> version,
>>>>>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should
>>>>>>>>>> do it
>>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will
>>>>>>>>>> look
>>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>>> source/
>>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 06/28/2013 03:56 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> 2013/6/28 Rob Weir<ro...@apache.org>
>
>> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>
>> wrote:
>>> Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>
>>>> 2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge
>> mirror
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> do
>>>>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/
>> <LANG>/<file_name>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the
>> mirror:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You can do that in few ways:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
>>>>>> would be fine;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>>>>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
>>>>>> normal file browsing;
>>>>>>
>>>>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
>>>>>> messages.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
>>>>> weekend.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
>>>> staged directory method are that:
>>>>
>>>> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
>>>> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
>>>> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
>>>> admin, deletion, etc.).
>>>>
>>>> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
>>>> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
>>>> you.
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new
>> directory.
>>> I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or
>> am I
>>> on a wrong way?
>>
>>
> I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
> SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.

OK, done by PM.

>>> BTW:
>>> Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure with
>>> AOO 4?
>>>
>>> So, the old ones, e.g.:
>>>
>>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/
>>>
>>> and
>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/
>>>
>>> will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep
>> it
>>> simple and reduced complexity:
>>>
>>>
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>
>
> Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
> reason.

OK

>> I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged?  Or is the
>> plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?

At least up now, old installation files were simply moved into the archive.

> My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.
>
> The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
> per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
> from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
> their total download count shouldn't change.

Marcus



>>>>>>> PS:
>>>>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to
>> start
>>>>>>> the
>>>>>>> download?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
>>>>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>>>>>> it to the URL.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
>>>>>>>> en-GB,
>>>>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
>>>>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download
>> scripting
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new
>>>>>>>>> version,
>>>>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it
>>>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look
>>>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>>>> source/
>>>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2013/6/28 Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>

> On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de>
> wrote:
> > Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> >
> >> 2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
> >>>
> >>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
> >>>>
> >>>>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge
> mirror
> >>>>> to
> >>>>> do
> >>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/
> <LANG>/<file_name>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the
> mirror:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> You can do that in few ways:
> >>>>
> >>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
> >>>> would be fine;
> >>>>
> >>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
> >>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
> >>>> normal file browsing;
> >>>>
> >>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
> >>>> messages.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
> >>> weekend.
> >>
> >>
> >> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
> >> staged directory method are that:
> >>
> >> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
> >> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
> >> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
> >> admin, deletion, etc.).
> >>
> >> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
> >> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
> >> you.
> >
> >
> > OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new
> directory.
> > I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or
> am I
> > on a wrong way?
>
>
I guess you've not been put among projects' admin. Please send me your
SourceForge account and I'll do rightaway.


>  >
> >
> > BTW:
> > Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure with
> > AOO 4?
> >
> > So, the old ones, e.g.:
> >
> >
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/
> >
> > and
> >
> > http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/
> >
> > will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep
> it
> > simple and reduced complexity:
> >
> >
> > .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
> > .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
> > .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>

Yea, and I guess the staged approach would be good especially for this
reason.



>
> I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged?  Or is the
> plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?
>

My suggestion is to leave them as they are, here's why.

The stats are tied to the path and filename, so if you move them, the
per-file/per-folder stats won't be available anymore. Note that the stats
from the old locations are still counted in aggregate totals though. So,
their total download count shouldn't change.

Roberto


>
> -Rob
>
>
> > Marcus
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >>>>> PS:
> >>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to
> start
> >>>>> the
> >>>>> download?
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
> >>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
> >>>> it to the URL.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Marcus
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> >>>>>
> >>>>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
> >>>>>> en-GB,
> >>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
> >>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
> >>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Thanks in advance.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Marcus
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download
> scripting
> >>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new
> >>>>>>> version,
> >>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it
> >>>>>>> fast
> >>>>>>> as the time is running.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
> >>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
> >>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
> >>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> 3.
> >>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look
> >>>>>>> like
> >>>>>>> the following:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
> >>>>>>> aoo/
> >>>>>>> 4.0.0/
> >>>>>>> binaries/
> >>>>>>> en-US/
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
> >>>>>>> aoo/
> >>>>>>> 4.0.0/
> >>>>>>> binaries/
> >>>>>>> en-US/
> >>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
> >>>>>>> aoo/
> >>>>>>> 4.0.0/
> >>>>>>> source/
> >>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>
>

Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Rob Weir <ro...@apache.org>.
On Thu, Jun 27, 2013 at 6:01 PM, Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de> wrote:
> Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>
>> 2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>
>>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>>
>>>>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror
>>>>> to
>>>>> do
>>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/<file_name>
>>>>>
>>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> You can do that in few ways:
>>>>
>>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
>>>> would be fine;
>>>>
>>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
>>>> normal file browsing;
>>>>
>>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error
>>>> messages.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
>>> weekend.
>>
>>
>> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
>> staged directory method are that:
>>
>> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
>> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
>> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
>> admin, deletion, etc.).
>>
>> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
>> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
>> you.
>
>
> OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new directory.
> I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new options. Or am I
> on a wrong way?
>
>
>
> BTW:
> Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure with
> AOO 4?
>
> So, the old ones, e.g.:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/
>
> and
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/
>
> will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep it
> simple and reduced complexity:
>
>
> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>

I assume the old 3.4.1/3.4.0 files will remain unchanged?  Or is the
plan to adapt them to the new directory scheme?

-Rob


> Marcus
>
>
>
>
>>>>> PS:
>>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start
>>>>> the
>>>>> download?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
>>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>>>> it to the URL.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>
>>>>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US,
>>>>>> en-GB,
>>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
>>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new
>>>>>>> version,
>>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it
>>>>>>> fast
>>>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look
>>>>>>> like
>>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>>> source/
>>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org
>

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 06/26/2013 01:36 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> 2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>>
>>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>>
>>>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to
>>>> do
>>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/<file_name>
>>>>
>>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
>>>
>>>
>>> You can do that in few ways:
>>>
>>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
>>> would be fine;
>>>
>>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
>>> normal file browsing;
>>>
>>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.
>>
>>
>> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
>> weekend.
>
> Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
> staged directory method are that:
>
> (1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
> marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
> and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
> admin, deletion, etc.).
>
> For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
> you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
> you.

OK, sounds really better. However, I seem to fail to create a new 
directory. I got an account on SourceForge now but I don't see any new 
options. Or am I on a wrong way?



BTW:
Have you already noticed that we will change the directory structure 
with AOO 4?

So, the old ones, e.g.:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/localized/de/3.4.1/

and

http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/files/stable/3.4.1/

will be cancelled and the following structure will become valid to keep 
it simple and reduced complexity:

.../aoo/4.0.0/source/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
.../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/

Marcus



>>>> PS:
>>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start
>>>> the
>>>> download?
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
>>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>>> it to the URL.
>>
>>
>> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>>>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>
>>>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>>>>
>>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
>>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
>>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>>
>>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>>>>
>>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcus
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>>
>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> 3.
>>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>>>>
>>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>>>>>> the following:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>> binaries/
>>>>>> en-US/
>>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>>>>> aoo/
>>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>>> source/
>>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2013/6/25 Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de>:
> Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
>>
>> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>>
>>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to
>>> do
>>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>>
>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/<file_name>
>>>
>>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
>>
>>
>> You can do that in few ways:
>>
>> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
>> would be fine;
>>
>> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
>> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
>> normal file browsing;
>>
>> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.
>
>
> great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming
> weekend.

Maybe I missed to clarify something, though. The nice things about the
staged directory method are that:

(1) the files are in their right place for when they go live (get
marked as unstaged), so no new waiting for mirror-updates is needed,
and (2) there's no need for fiddling with extra projects (setup,
admin, deletion, etc.).

For those reasons I'd encourage you to consider the second option. If
you want some help just let me know, I can ask our Support to help
you.

Roberto



>
>>> PS:
>>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start
>>> the
>>> download?
>>
>>
>>
>>
>> The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
>> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
>> it to the URL.
>
>
> OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.
>
> Thanks
>
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
>>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>
>>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>>
>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>>>
>>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
>>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
>>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>>
>>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>>
>>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>>>
>>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>>
>>>> Marcus
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting
>>>>> to
>>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>>
>>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>>
>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>>
>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>>
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> 3.
>>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>>>
>>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>>>>> the following:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>>> aoo/
>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>> binaries/
>>>>> en-US/
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>>> aoo/
>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>> binaries/
>>>>> en-US/
>>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>>>> aoo/
>>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>>> source/
>>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Am 06/25/2013 05:28 PM, schrieb Roberto Galoppini:
> 2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo)<ma...@wtnet.de>:
>> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to do
>> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/<file_name>
>>
>> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...
>
> You can do that in few ways:
>
> - you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
> would be fine;
>
> - you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
> all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
> normal file browsing;
>
> - you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.

great, I can do it myself. I'll give it a try until or at the coming 
weekend.

>> PS:
>> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start the
>> download?
>
>
>
> The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
> still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
> it to the URL.

OK, then I will make sure that this is still added to the download URL.

Thanks

Marcus



>> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>
>>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>>
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>>
>>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
>>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
>>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>>
>>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>>
>>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>>
>>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>>
>>> Thanks in advance.
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>>
>>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
>>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>>
>>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>>>> as the time is running.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>>
>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>>
>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>>
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>>
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>>
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 3.
>>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>>
>>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>>
>>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>>>> the following:
>>>>
>>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>>> aoo/
>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>> binaries/
>>>> en-US/
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>>> aoo/
>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>> binaries/
>>>> en-US/
>>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>>
>>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>>> aoo/
>>>> 4.0.0/
>>>> source/
>>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by Roberto Galoppini <ro...@gmail.com>.
2013/6/8 Marcus (OOo) <ma...@wtnet.de>:
> Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror to do
> some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/<file_name>
>
> You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...

You can do that in few ways:

- you can create a new project and do any testing you want in it, that
would be fine;

- you can create a new folder and mark it as "staged" in which it is
all set up and downloads work, but the folder won't be visible during
normal file browsing;

- you can point to not existing AOO 4.0 files and get 404 error messages.



> PS:
> Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start the
> download?



The /download should be there at the end of the URL.  If it's not, it
still should work, but we'll do an extra redirect on our side to add
it to the URL.

Hope it helps.

Roberto

> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>
>> I've updated the test area in staging:
>>
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>>
>> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
>> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
>> might be just a missing language. ;-)
>> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>>
>> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>>
>> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>>
>> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>>
>> Thanks in advance.
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>>
>>
>> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>>>
>>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
>>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>>> new directory + filename structure).
>>>
>>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>>> as the time is running.
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>>
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>>
>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>
>>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>>
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>>
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>>
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> 3.
>>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>>
>>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>>> the following:
>>>
>>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>>> aoo/
>>> 4.0.0/
>>> binaries/
>>> en-US/
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>>> aoo/
>>> 4.0.0/
>>> binaries/
>>> en-US/
>>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>>
>>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>>> aoo/
>>> 4.0.0/
>>> source/
>>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
Roberto, is it possible to get a separate area on a SourceForge mirror 
to do some semi-live testing. I could think of the following:

http://sourceforge.net/projects/aoo-test.mirror/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/<file_name>

You can use the files from my Apache people account to fill the mirror:

http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/binaries/...

PS:
Is it right that the URL still needs a "/download" at its end to start 
the download?

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 10:08 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> I've updated the test area in staging:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html
>
> To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB,
> de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it
> might be just a missing language. ;-)
> And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.
>
> For the first troubleshooting the following could help:
>
> http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html
>
> Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
> Marcus
>
>
>
> Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
>> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
>> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
>> new directory + filename structure).
>>
>> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
>> as the time is running.
>>
>>
>>
>> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>>
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
>> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>>
>>
>>
>> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
>> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>>
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>>
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>>
>>
>>
>> 3.
>> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>>
>> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
>> the following:
>>
>> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> binaries/
>> en-US/
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dist/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> binaries/
>> en-US/
>> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>>
>> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
>> aoo/
>> 4.0.0/
>> source/
>> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>>
>>
>>
>> Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org


Re: [DL][Website] Preparing AOO 4

Posted by "Marcus (OOo)" <ma...@wtnet.de>.
I've updated the test area in staging:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/index.html

To keep it simple and get faster results, I've just added en-US, en-GB, 
de languages to my Apache people account. So, when you see errors it 
might be just a missing language. ;-)
And don't worry about the 0 byte files. Yes, they are empty.

For the first troubleshooting the following could help:

http://ooo-site.staging.apache.org/download/test/analyze.html

Please test and tell me what needs to be changed/improved.

Thanks in advance.

Marcus



Am 06/08/2013 07:37 PM, schrieb Marcus (OOo):
> I'm going to finish the last work for changing the download scripting to
> apply with the new situation ("incubating" string is gone, new version,
> new directory + filename structure).
>
> If the following needs still to be discussed, then we should do it fast
> as the time is running.
>
>
>
> 1. I'm working with the following directory structure:
>
> .../aoo/4.0.0/source/
> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/<LANG>/
> .../aoo/4.0.0/binaries/SDK/
>
>
>
> 2. I'm working with the following filename structure:
> (especially @Juergen + Ariel)
>
> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>
> Apache_OpenOffice-SDK_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
>
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-deb_en-US.tar.gz
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86_langpack-rpm_en-US.tar.gz
>
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_install_en-US.dmg
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_MacOS_x86_langpack_en-US.dmg
>
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_install_en-US.exe
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Win_x86_langpack_en-US.exe
>
>
>
> 3.
> I'm testing with my Apache people account:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~marcus/aoo/4.0.0/[source|binaries]/...
>
> However, I assume the new structure for the real servers will look like
> the following:
>
> http://sourceforge.net/projects/openofficeorg.mirror/
> aoo/
> 4.0.0/
> binaries/
> en-US/
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz/download
>
> http://www.apache.org/dist/
> aoo/
> 4.0.0/
> binaries/
> en-US/
> Apache_OpenOffice_4.0.0_Linux_x86-64_install-rpm_en-US.tar.gz.md5
>
> http://www.apache.org/dyn/aoo-closer.cgi/
> aoo/
> 4.0.0/
> source/
> aoo-4.0.0-r1234567890-src.tar.bz2
>
>
>
> Marcus

---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@openoffice.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@openoffice.apache.org