You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/10/16 19:50:31 UTC
[jira] Created: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files
or exploded?
Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
-----------------------------------------------
Key: GERONIMO-4912
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
Project: Geronimo
Issue Type: Improvement
Security Level: public (Regular issues)
Components: osgi
Affects Versions: 3.0
Reporter: David Jencks
Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar
files or exploded?
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781820#action_12781820 ]
David Jencks commented on GERONIMO-4912:
----------------------------------------
I would really rather not unpack plugins unless we have no alternative, so I'll look into fixing these problems.
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar
files or exploded?
Posted by "Shawn Jiang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12767659#action_12767659 ]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4912:
---------------------------------------
Seems karaf support exploded bundles already, See: http://felix.apache.org/site/1-overview.html
{quote}
In addition, the Karaf also supports exploded bundles and custom deployers (blueprint and spring ones are included by default).
{quote}
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar
files or exploded?
Posted by "Shawn Jiang (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12781809#action_12781809 ]
Shawn Jiang commented on GERONIMO-4912:
---------------------------------------
Currently, some API that assumes car are exploded are not working well because car are packed in Geronimo 3.0. Some of them are:
RepositoryConfigurationStore.listConfigurations()
ExecutableConfigurationUtil.writeConfiguration(ConfigurationData, File)
RepositoryConfigurationStore.createNewConfigurationDir(Artifact)
Which are keeping me from migrating some of deployer shell commands.
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files
or exploded?
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Jencks updated GERONIMO-4912:
-----------------------------------
Fix Version/s: 3.0
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Closed: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files
or exploded?
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Jencks closed GERONIMO-4912.
----------------------------------
Resolution: Invalid
I haven't heard of problems recently so think this is working ok.
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Assigned: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files
or exploded?
Posted by "David Jencks (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
David Jencks reassigned GERONIMO-4912:
--------------------------------------
Assignee: David Jencks
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Commented: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar
files or exploded?
Posted by "Rick McGuire (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12767425#action_12767425 ]
Rick McGuire commented on GERONIMO-4912:
----------------------------------------
There was some recent discussion within osgi of defining a standard URL handler to allow a directory of files to be loaded as a bundle. There was a lot of discussion, but I'm not sure it really went anywhere. I'm not aware that there's any standard ability to do this.
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
[jira] Updated: (GERONIMO-4912) Should plugins be packed jar files
or exploded?
Posted by "Rick McGuire (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org>.
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Rick McGuire updated GERONIMO-4912:
-----------------------------------
Issue Type: Sub-task (was: Improvement)
Parent: GERONIMO-5087
> Should plugins be packed jar files or exploded?
> -----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: GERONIMO-4912
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GERONIMO-4912
> Project: Geronimo
> Issue Type: Sub-task
> Security Level: public(Regular issues)
> Components: osgi
> Affects Versions: 3.0
> Reporter: David Jencks
> Assignee: David Jencks
> Fix For: 3.0
>
>
> Currently the osgi framework only works with plugins packed as jar files, not exploded jar files like the regular geronimo server. Since osgi can deal with classpaths inside a jar file, I rather think that we should proceed with this as standard practice for the rest of the server. However this will mean moving the archiving functionality out of the car-maven-plugin and into the deployer.
> The alternative is to make sure that unpacked plugins actually work in osgi. I didn't experiment with this at all.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.