You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@geronimo.apache.org by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net> on 2008/03/13 19:17:51 UTC

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 samples - Archetype


The archetype needs to be documented in the wiki for 2.1+ if we intend 
to encourage its use.  I assume that is still the case (please speak-up 
otherwise).  BTW, I'm not sure what it would mean to release the 
archetype.  It produces a jar but I'm not sure what it would be used 
for.  Anybody have any opinions?

Joe

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 samples - Archetype

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:41 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:

> David Jencks wrote:
>> On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
>>>
>>>
>>> The archetype needs to be documented in the wiki for 2.1+ if we  
>>> intend to encourage its use.  I assume that is still the case  
>>> (please speak-up otherwise).  BTW, I'm not sure what it would  
>>> mean to release the archetype.  It produces a jar but I'm not  
>>> sure what it would be used for.  Anybody have any opinions?
>> The new (plugin and assembly) archetypes are documented:
>> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/Constructing+a 
>> +special-purpose+server+using+maven
>> If you have suggestions on how to document them better I'm all  
>> ears.  This is the best I could think of.
>
> David,
>
> I'm specifically talking about the archetype for the samples  
> located here: https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/ 
> branches/2.1/geronimo-samples-archetype/
> not the plugin or assembly archetypes.
>
> I'm really just listing things that I think we need to clear up  
> before we can release the 2.1 samples and trying to understand what  
> it might mean to release the samples archetype.

My apologies Joe, I misread the subject.
/engage brain before fingers

thanks
david jencks

>
> Joe

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 samples - Archetype

Posted by Joe Bohn <jo...@earthlink.net>.
David Jencks wrote:
> 
> On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:
> 
>>
>>
>> The archetype needs to be documented in the wiki for 2.1+ if we intend 
>> to encourage its use.  I assume that is still the case (please 
>> speak-up otherwise).  BTW, I'm not sure what it would mean to release 
>> the archetype.  It produces a jar but I'm not sure what it would be 
>> used for.  Anybody have any opinions?
> 
> The new (plugin and assembly) archetypes are documented:
> 
> http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/Constructing+a+special-purpose+server+using+maven
> 
> If you have suggestions on how to document them better I'm all ears. 
>  This is the best I could think of.
> 

David,

I'm specifically talking about the archetype for the samples located 
here: 
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/geronimo/samples/branches/2.1/geronimo-samples-archetype/
not the plugin or assembly archetypes.

I'm really just listing things that I think we need to clear up before 
we can release the 2.1 samples and trying to understand what it might 
mean to release the samples archetype.

Joe

Re: [DISCUSS] Geronimo 2.1 samples - Archetype

Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
On Mar 13, 2008, at 11:17 AM, Joe Bohn wrote:

>
>
> The archetype needs to be documented in the wiki for 2.1+ if we  
> intend to encourage its use.  I assume that is still the case  
> (please speak-up otherwise).  BTW, I'm not sure what it would mean  
> to release the archetype.  It produces a jar but I'm not sure what  
> it would be used for.  Anybody have any opinions?

The new (plugin and assembly) archetypes are documented:

http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/GMOxDOC21/Constructing+a 
+special-purpose+server+using+maven

If you have suggestions on how to document them better I'm all ears.   
This is the best I could think of.

thanks
david jencks
>
> Joe