You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de> on 2010/09/02 06:43:08 UTC
[JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Hello,
I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
console:
WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
account instead.
The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
this:
<ordering>
<before>
<others/>
</before>
</ordering>
See:
https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
is a bug in MyFaces.
http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
What do you think? Is it a bug?
Christian
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Posted by Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>.
Thank you very much! :-)
Christian
2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2905
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Should be easy fix
>>
>> -M
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> I think I need new glasses...
>>>
>>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>>> configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and
>>> the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>>> account instead.
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
>>> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>>> Hey Matthias,
>>>>
>>>> thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue:
>>>>
>>>> http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests
>>>>
>>>> Just checkout the "jsf2" branch and run via "mvn tomcat:run-war" and
>>>> you will see the warning.
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
>>>>> HEy Christian,
>>>>>
>>>>> I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad,
>>>>> which has a similar entry:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> -M
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
>>>>> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
>>>>>> preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
>>>>>> environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
>>>>>> console:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>>>>>> configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
>>>>>> and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>>>>>> account instead.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
>>>>>> our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
>>>>>> this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> <ordering>
>>>>>> <before>
>>>>>> <others/>
>>>>>> </before>
>>>>>> </ordering>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> See:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
>>>>>>
>>>>>> We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
>>>>>> is a bug in MyFaces.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
>>>>>>
>>>>>> What do you think? Is it a bug?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Christian
>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>>>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/MYFACES-2905
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:58 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> Should be easy fix
>
> -M
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
>> I think I need new glasses...
>>
>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>> configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and
>> the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>> account instead.
>>
>> -M
>>
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
>> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>> Hey Matthias,
>>>
>>> thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue:
>>>
>>> http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests
>>>
>>> Just checkout the "jsf2" branch and run via "mvn tomcat:run-war" and
>>> you will see the warning.
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>>
>>> 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
>>>> HEy Christian,
>>>>
>>>> I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad,
>>>> which has a similar entry:
>>>>
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml
>>>>
>>>> -M
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
>>>> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
>>>>> preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
>>>>> environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
>>>>> console:
>>>>>
>>>>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>>>>> configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
>>>>> and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>>>>> account instead.
>>>>>
>>>>> The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
>>>>> our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
>>>>> this:
>>>>>
>>>>> <ordering>
>>>>> <before>
>>>>> <others/>
>>>>> </before>
>>>>> </ordering>
>>>>>
>>>>> See:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
>>>>>
>>>>> I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
>>>>>
>>>>> We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
>>>>> is a bug in MyFaces.
>>>>>
>>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
>>>>>
>>>>> What do you think? Is it a bug?
>>>>>
>>>>> Christian
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>>
>>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
Should be easy fix
-M
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 10:57 AM, Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org> wrote:
> I think I need new glasses...
>
> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
> configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and
> the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
> account instead.
>
> -M
>
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>> Hey Matthias,
>>
>> thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue:
>>
>> http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests
>>
>> Just checkout the "jsf2" branch and run via "mvn tomcat:run-war" and
>> you will see the warning.
>>
>> Christian
>>
>>
>> 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
>>> HEy Christian,
>>>
>>> I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad,
>>> which has a similar entry:
>>>
>>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml
>>>
>>> -M
>>>
>>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
>>> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>>> Hello,
>>>>
>>>> I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
>>>> preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
>>>> environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
>>>> console:
>>>>
>>>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>>>> configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
>>>> and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>>>> account instead.
>>>>
>>>> The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
>>>> our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
>>>> this:
>>>>
>>>> <ordering>
>>>> <before>
>>>> <others/>
>>>> </before>
>>>> </ordering>
>>>>
>>>> See:
>>>>
>>>> https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
>>>>
>>>> I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
>>>>
>>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
>>>>
>>>> We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
>>>> is a bug in MyFaces.
>>>>
>>>> http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
>>>>
>>>> What do you think? Is it a bug?
>>>>
>>>> Christian
>>>>
>>>> --
>>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> --
>>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>>
>>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Christian Kaltepoth
>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
I think I need new glasses...
WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
configuration resource trinidad. This description will be ignored and
the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
account instead.
-M
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 9:24 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
<ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
> Hey Matthias,
>
> thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue:
>
> http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests
>
> Just checkout the "jsf2" branch and run via "mvn tomcat:run-war" and
> you will see the warning.
>
> Christian
>
>
> 2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
>> HEy Christian,
>>
>> I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad,
>> which has a similar entry:
>>
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml
>>
>> -M
>>
>> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
>> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
>>> preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
>>> environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
>>> console:
>>>
>>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>>> configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
>>> and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>>> account instead.
>>>
>>> The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
>>> our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
>>> this:
>>>
>>> <ordering>
>>> <before>
>>> <others/>
>>> </before>
>>> </ordering>
>>>
>>> See:
>>>
>>> https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
>>>
>>> I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
>>>
>>> http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
>>>
>>> We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
>>> is a bug in MyFaces.
>>>
>>> http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
>>>
>>> What do you think? Is it a bug?
>>>
>>> Christian
>>>
>>> --
>>> Christian Kaltepoth
>>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>>
>>
>>
>>
>> --
>> Matthias Wessendorf
>>
>> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
>> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
>> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Posted by Christian Kaltepoth <ch...@kaltepoth.de>.
Hey Matthias,
thank you very much. You can use this sample app to reproduce this issue:
http://github.com/chkal/prettyfaces-tests
Just checkout the "jsf2" branch and run via "mvn tomcat:run-war" and
you will see the warning.
Christian
2010/9/2 Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>:
> HEy Christian,
>
> I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad,
> which has a similar entry:
>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml
>
> -M
>
> On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
> <ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
>> preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
>> environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
>> console:
>>
>> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
>> configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
>> and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
>> account instead.
>>
>> The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
>> our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
>> this:
>>
>> <ordering>
>> <before>
>> <others/>
>> </before>
>> </ordering>
>>
>> See:
>>
>> https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
>>
>> I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
>>
>> http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
>>
>> We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
>> is a bug in MyFaces.
>>
>> http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
>>
>> What do you think? Is it a bug?
>>
>> Christian
>>
>> --
>> Christian Kaltepoth
>> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
>> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>>
>
>
>
> --
> Matthias Wessendorf
>
> blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
> sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
> twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf
>
--
Christian Kaltepoth
Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
Re: [JSF2] absolute-ordering warning
Posted by Matthias Wessendorf <ma...@apache.org>.
HEy Christian,
I will take a look. I think I have not seen this issue w/ Trinidad,
which has a similar entry:
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/myfaces/trinidad/trunk/trinidad-impl/src/main/conf/META-INF/faces-config-base.xml
-M
On Thu, Sep 2, 2010 at 6:43 AM, Christian Kaltepoth
<ch...@kaltepoth.de> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I'm committer on the PrettyFaces project and we are currently
> preparing our next release. While testing the release in different
> environments I discovered that MyFaces 2.0.1 prints a warning to the
> console:
>
> WARNING: <absolute-ordering> element found in application
> configuration resource prettyfaces. This description will be ignored
> and the actions described in <ordering> elements will be taken into
> account instead.
>
> The weird thing about this is that we DON'T use <absolute-ordering> in
> our faces-config.xml at all. Our ordering configuration looks like
> this:
>
> <ordering>
> <before>
> <others/>
> </before>
> </ordering>
>
> See:
>
> https://prettyfaces.googlecode.com/svn/prettyfaces/trunk/impl-jsf2/src/main/resources/META-INF/faces-config.xml
>
> I looked at the MyFaces code and found the code emitting this warning:
>
> http://myfaces.apache.org/core20/myfaces-impl/xref/org/apache/myfaces/config/FacesConfigurator.html#982
>
> We discussed this issue on the prettyfaces-dev list. We think that it
> is a bug in MyFaces.
>
> http://groups.google.com/group/prettyfaces-dev/msg/da44e1e6660887c6
>
> What do you think? Is it a bug?
>
> Christian
>
> --
> Christian Kaltepoth
> Blog: http://chkal.blogspot.com/
> Twitter: http://twitter.com/chkal
>
--
Matthias Wessendorf
blog: http://matthiaswessendorf.wordpress.com/
sessions: http://www.slideshare.net/mwessendorf
twitter: http://twitter.com/mwessendorf