You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to commits@hudi.apache.org by GitBox <gi...@apache.org> on 2022/04/26 23:24:14 UTC

[GitHub] [hudi] vinothchandar commented on pull request #4718: [HUDI-3345][RFC-36] Proposal for hudi metastore server.

vinothchandar commented on PR #4718:
URL: https://github.com/apache/hudi/pull/4718#issuecomment-1110341372

   On this RFC, I think the main thing is to decide the first phase scope. IMO, it can be limited to just Hudi tables for now and depending on whether a `hudi.metastore.uris` is configured or not, the queries will use this metaserver or not. 
   
   Does the RFC address high availability/sharding of metadata? Have you thought about these? If the metastore will also deal with locks, then the servers will become stateful. May be we can phase them as well? @minihippo thoughts?


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: commits-unsubscribe@hudi.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org