You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@myfaces.apache.org by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> on 2008/11/25 00:57:09 UTC
Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge 1.0.0-alpha-3
All, okay, I am changing my vote on this back to +1. I'm sorry for the
delay but our minor legal issue has been fixed. It required Oracle to
change their license on the JSR-301 final draft and required us to add a
clause to the notice of the api and impl which says the code is not yet
based on a final spec.
I've updated the artifacts and will hold this vote open for a few more
days to let people review the changes to the notices if they want.
Since there was no real code change though, I don't see a need to redo
the vote alltogether. If you disagree, let me know.
Scott
Scott O'Bryan wrote:
> I am actually going to have to change my vote to -1 right now. There
> arose a minor legal issue dealing with the liscense of the public
> draft for 301 which I think we'll need to fix before release. I'm
> going to hold the vote open for a bit longer the required because
> we're fairly confident we can get it sorted out pretty quick. The
> only artifact this will change will likely be the notice. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>>> +1
>>>
>>> regards
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>
>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com
>>> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi,
>>>
>>> I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master
>>> 1.0.0-alpha-3. This release was created in order to support the
>>> latest JSR-301 Public Review so that it may be tested by
>>> developers during the review process. This is still an alpha
>>> release because there is currently no testing of the R.I.
>>>
>>> I have applied the changes needed by PORTLETBRIDGE-51, regenerated
>>> all of the artifacts, and deployed them to my private Apache
>>> account ([1]). I'm am now restarting the vote for the latest R.I.
>>>
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>> [ ] +0
>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>> released,
>>> and why..............
>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3
>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge 1.0.0-alpha-3
Posted by Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>.
Darn it.. Yeah, sorry. I'll close the release today. Everything is
basically in place and I was allowing a few days for people to look at
the new license, but it's been open long enough.
Scott
Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>
>
> On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu4242@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> Hi
>
> Just a question: I would like to see portlet bridge artifacts
> released soon, for include it on myfaces archetypes (and release
> it too). Since we have a positive consensus, when could be this
> artifacts released?
>
>
> Any idea about when this artifacts could be released? If no idea, I'll
> start release procedure for myfaces archetypes the next days.
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
>
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Scott O'Bryan
> <darkarena@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> All, okay, I am changing my vote on this back to +1. I'm
> sorry for the delay but our minor legal issue has been fixed.
> It required Oracle to change their license on the JSR-301
> final draft and required us to add a clause to the notice of
> the api and impl which says the code is not yet based on a
> final spec.
>
> I've updated the artifacts and will hold this vote open for a
> few more days to let people review the changes to the notices
> if they want. Since there was no real code change though, I
> don't see a need to redo the vote alltogether. If you
> disagree, let me know.
>
>
> Scott
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>
> I am actually going to have to change my vote to -1 right
> now. There arose a minor legal issue dealing with the
> liscense of the public draft for 301 which I think we'll
> need to fix before release. I'm going to hold the vote
> open for a bit longer the required because we're fairly
> confident we can get it sorted out pretty quick. The only
> artifact this will change will likely be the notice. :)
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>
> +1
>
> Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>
> +1
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan
> <darkarena@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>
> <mailto:darkarena@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>>> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet
> Bridge Master
> 1.0.0-alpha-3. This release was created in
> order to support the
> latest JSR-301 Public Review so that it may be
> tested by
> developers during the review process. This is
> still an alpha
> release because there is currently no testing
> of the R.I.
>
> I have applied the changes needed by
> PORTLETBRIDGE-51, regenerated
> all of the artifacts, and deployed them to my
> private Apache
> account ([1]). I'm am now restarting the vote
> for the latest R.I.
>
> ------------------------------------------------
> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed
> the bits
> [ ] +0
> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these
> bits not to be
> released,
> and why..............
> ------------------------------------------------
>
> Thanks,
> Scott
>
> [1]
> http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>
> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge 1.0.0-alpha-3
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
On Thu, Nov 27, 2008 at 7:50 AM, Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi
>
> Just a question: I would like to see portlet bridge artifacts released
> soon, for include it on myfaces archetypes (and release it too). Since we
> have a positive consensus, when could be this artifacts released?
>
Any idea about when this artifacts could be released? If no idea, I'll start
release procedure for myfaces archetypes the next days.
regards
Leonardo Uribe
>
> regards
>
> Leonardo Uribe
>
> On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> All, okay, I am changing my vote on this back to +1. I'm sorry for the
>> delay but our minor legal issue has been fixed. It required Oracle to
>> change their license on the JSR-301 final draft and required us to add a
>> clause to the notice of the api and impl which says the code is not yet
>> based on a final spec.
>>
>> I've updated the artifacts and will hold this vote open for a few more
>> days to let people review the changes to the notices if they want. Since
>> there was no real code change though, I don't see a need to redo the vote
>> alltogether. If you disagree, let me know.
>>
>>
>> Scott
>>
>> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>
>>> I am actually going to have to change my vote to -1 right now. There
>>> arose a minor legal issue dealing with the liscense of the public draft for
>>> 301 which I think we'll need to fix before release. I'm going to hold the
>>> vote open for a bit longer the required because we're fairly confident we
>>> can get it sorted out pretty quick. The only artifact this will change will
>>> likely be the notice. :)
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Scott
>>>
>>> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> +1
>>>>>
>>>>> regards
>>>>>
>>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>>
>>>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>>> darkarena@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master
>>>>> 1.0.0-alpha-3. This release was created in order to support the
>>>>> latest JSR-301 Public Review so that it may be tested by
>>>>> developers during the review process. This is still an alpha
>>>>> release because there is currently no testing of the R.I.
>>>>>
>>>>> I have applied the changes needed by PORTLETBRIDGE-51, regenerated
>>>>> all of the artifacts, and deployed them to my private Apache
>>>>> account ([1]). I'm am now restarting the vote for the latest R.I.
>>>>>
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>>> [ ] +0
>>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>>> released,
>>>>> and why..............
>>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Scott
>>>>>
>>>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3<http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release of Portlet Bridge 1.0.0-alpha-3
Posted by Leonardo Uribe <lu...@gmail.com>.
Hi
Just a question: I would like to see portlet bridge artifacts released soon,
for include it on myfaces archetypes (and release it too). Since we have a
positive consensus, when could be this artifacts released?
regards
Leonardo Uribe
On Mon, Nov 24, 2008 at 6:57 PM, Scott O'Bryan <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
> All, okay, I am changing my vote on this back to +1. I'm sorry for the
> delay but our minor legal issue has been fixed. It required Oracle to
> change their license on the JSR-301 final draft and required us to add a
> clause to the notice of the api and impl which says the code is not yet
> based on a final spec.
>
> I've updated the artifacts and will hold this vote open for a few more days
> to let people review the changes to the notices if they want. Since there
> was no real code change though, I don't see a need to redo the vote
> alltogether. If you disagree, let me know.
>
>
> Scott
>
> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>
>> I am actually going to have to change my vote to -1 right now. There
>> arose a minor legal issue dealing with the liscense of the public draft for
>> 301 which I think we'll need to fix before release. I'm going to hold the
>> vote open for a bit longer the required because we're fairly confident we
>> can get it sorted out pretty quick. The only artifact this will change will
>> likely be the notice. :)
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Scott
>>
>> Scott O'Bryan wrote:
>>
>>> +1
>>>
>>> Leonardo Uribe wrote:
>>>
>>>> +1
>>>>
>>>> regards
>>>>
>>>> Leonardo Uribe
>>>>
>>>> On Mon, Oct 27, 2008 at 11:23 AM, Scott O'Bryan <darkarena@gmail.com<mailto:
>>>> darkarena@gmail.com>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Hi,
>>>>
>>>> I'm trying to release the MyFaces Portlet Bridge Master
>>>> 1.0.0-alpha-3. This release was created in order to support the
>>>> latest JSR-301 Public Review so that it may be tested by
>>>> developers during the review process. This is still an alpha
>>>> release because there is currently no testing of the R.I.
>>>>
>>>> I have applied the changes needed by PORTLETBRIDGE-51, regenerated
>>>> all of the artifacts, and deployed them to my private Apache
>>>> account ([1]). I'm am now restarting the vote for the latest R.I.
>>>>
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>> [ ] +1 for community members who have reviewed the bits
>>>> [ ] +0
>>>> [ ] -1 for fatal flaws that should cause these bits not to be
>>>> released,
>>>> and why..............
>>>> ------------------------------------------------
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Scott
>>>>
>>>> [1] http://people.apache.org/~sobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3<http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>>>> <http://people.apache.org/%7Esobryan/portlet-bridge/1.0.0-alpha-3>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>
>>
>