You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com> on 2005/07/03 06:41:09 UTC
no X Spam Status
although i have these in my local.cf file
rewrite_header subject ***SPAM(_SCORE_)***
required_hits 5.0
report_safe 2
lock_method flock
allow_user_rules 0
I dont see any of these in the header of th eemails received.
X-Spam-Status
X-Spam-Checker-Version:
X-Spam-Level:
how come?
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
these are displayed in the system.log
Jul 3 14:38:07 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13001 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:38:09 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13002 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:38:17 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13005 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:38:18 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13006 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:38:32 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13007 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:39:03 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13008 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:39:06 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13009 from=127.0.0.1
Jul 3 14:39:11 mail xinetd[369]: START: imap pid=13010 from=127.0.0.1
i think i did everything that are necessary to have this SA to run
On 7/3/05, liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On 7/3/05, Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org> wrote:
> > On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:54:20PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> > > this show SA is running, right?
> > > root 5815 0.0 1.0 43900 10172 ?? Ss Fri12PM 0:01.07
> > > /usr/bin/spamd -d
> > > root 5816 0.0 1.5 43932 15788 ?? S Fri12PM 0:00.75
> > > spamd child
> > > ...
> >
> > It does seem to be, yes.
> >
> > > this is in procmailrc
> > >
> > > :0fw
> > > | /usr/bin/spamc
> >
> > Ok, so you call spamc.
> >
> > Are you sure procmail is being called?
>
> how do check that? please
>
> Is there anything in your procmail log
> > (try enabling VERBOSE)? Is there anything in the system log from spamd? What
> > happens if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
> >
> > --
> > Randomly Generated Tagline:
> > "I'll be Bach." - Johann Sebastian Schwarzenegger
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
On 7/3/05, Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:54:20PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> > this show SA is running, right?
> > root 5815 0.0 1.0 43900 10172 ?? Ss Fri12PM 0:01.07
> > /usr/bin/spamd -d
> > root 5816 0.0 1.5 43932 15788 ?? S Fri12PM 0:00.75
> > spamd child
> > ...
>
> It does seem to be, yes.
>
> > this is in procmailrc
> >
> > :0fw
> > | /usr/bin/spamc
>
> Ok, so you call spamc.
>
> Are you sure procmail is being called?
how do check that? please
Is there anything in your procmail log
> (try enabling VERBOSE)? Is there anything in the system log from spamd? What
> happens if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> "I'll be Bach." - Johann Sebastian Schwarzenegger
>
>
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
i got this
Received: from localhost by mail.fke.utm.my
with SpamAssassin (version 3.0.4);
Sun, 03 Jul 2005 14:49:03 +0800
From: Sender <se...@example.net>
To: Recipient <re...@example.net>
Subject: ***SPAM(997.2)*** Test spam mail (GTUBE)
Date: Wed, 23 Jul 2003 23:30:00 +0200
Message-Id: <GT...@example.net>
X-Spam-Flag: YES
X-Spam-Status: Yes, score=997.2 required=5.0 tests=ALL_TRUSTED,
DNS_FROM_AHBL_RHSBL,GTUBE autolearn=failed version=3.0.4
X-Spam-Level: **************************************************
X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.0.4 (2005-06-05) on mail.fke.utm.my
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/mixed; boundary="----------=_42C78A5F.59FDB5D8"
This is a multi-part message in MIME format.
it seems to be working..
On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
>
> > if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
>
> Theo wins the day's egregious overuse of the "cat" command award for the
> day. "spamc <sample-spam.txt" works just as well and saves typing.
>
> {^_-}
>
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
OK OK i got it
the mailbox_command=/usr/sbin/procmail was commented in the main.cf
may be it was changed when i upgraded to the lastest version of SA
Thanks a lot, guys
On 7/3/05, liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com> wrote:
> i m running on Mac..it is supposed to be easy.
>
>
> On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > Are you running something like RedHat, SUSE, or Mandrake?
> >
> > If so they have a spamassassin setup already; and, you possibly could
> > have saved yourself time.
> >
> > Also note that those instructions are utterly obsolete for 3.0.4.
> > {^_^}
> > ----- Original Message -----
> > From: "liyas_m m" <li...@gmail.com>
> >
> >
> > > i followed this config.
> > >
> > > http://brneurosci.org/linuxsetup49.html
> > >
> > > On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > > From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
> > > >
> > > > > if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
> > > >
> > > > Theo wins the day's egregious overuse of the "cat" command award for the
> > > > day. "spamc <sample-spam.txt" works just as well and saves typing.
> > > >
> > > > {^_-}
> > > >
> > > >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
well, i was testing my MAc workstation to become a a mail
server..while waiting for the Xserve to come to my door step...funny
hah?
When I hv the Xserve..hmm i hope i will click here and there and then hooray
On 7/4/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> From: "Steven Dickenson" <st...@mrchuckles.net>
> > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> > Hash: SHA1
> >
> > On Jul 3, 2005, at 3:11 AM, liyas_m m wrote:
> >
> > > i m running on Mac..it is supposed to be easy.
> >
> > That's the funniest thing I've seen all week...
> >
> > Steven
>
> He does have a flare for making something that is easy into a hard job.
> Going to obsolete installation advice pages is not helping him at all.
> Ah well, live and learn.
>
> {^_^}
>
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
From: "Steven Dickenson" <st...@mrchuckles.net>
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA1
>
> On Jul 3, 2005, at 3:11 AM, liyas_m m wrote:
>
> > i m running on Mac..it is supposed to be easy.
>
> That's the funniest thing I've seen all week...
>
> Steven
He does have a flare for making something that is easy into a hard job.
Going to obsolete installation advice pages is not helping him at all.
Ah well, live and learn.
{^_^}
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by Steven Dickenson <st...@mrchuckles.net>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Jul 3, 2005, at 3:11 AM, liyas_m m wrote:
> i m running on Mac..it is supposed to be easy.
That's the funniest thing I've seen all week...
Steven
- ---
Steven Dickenson <st...@mrchuckles.net>
http://www.mrchuckles.net
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.1 (Darwin)
iD8DBQFCyBh95L54ch7cA1QRAl93AJ4tfWU7fv9EfaRYi59l98lPnfPvMQCgxL3f
EOsETQTUYXwq08lZYHWaM0A=
=5cA5
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
i m running on Mac..it is supposed to be easy.
On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> Are you running something like RedHat, SUSE, or Mandrake?
>
> If so they have a spamassassin setup already; and, you possibly could
> have saved yourself time.
>
> Also note that those instructions are utterly obsolete for 3.0.4.
> {^_^}
> ----- Original Message -----
> From: "liyas_m m" <li...@gmail.com>
>
>
> > i followed this config.
> >
> > http://brneurosci.org/linuxsetup49.html
> >
> > On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > > From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
> > >
> > > > if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
> > >
> > > Theo wins the day's egregious overuse of the "cat" command award for the
> > > day. "spamc <sample-spam.txt" works just as well and saves typing.
> > >
> > > {^_-}
> > >
> > >
>
>
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
Are you running something like RedHat, SUSE, or Mandrake?
If so they have a spamassassin setup already; and, you possibly could
have saved yourself time.
Also note that those instructions are utterly obsolete for 3.0.4.
{^_^}
----- Original Message -----
From: "liyas_m m" <li...@gmail.com>
> i followed this config.
>
> http://brneurosci.org/linuxsetup49.html
>
> On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> > From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
> >
> > > if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
> >
> > Theo wins the day's egregious overuse of the "cat" command award for the
> > day. "spamc <sample-spam.txt" works just as well and saves typing.
> >
> > {^_-}
> >
> >
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
i followed this config.
http://brneurosci.org/linuxsetup49.html
On 7/3/05, jdow <jd...@earthlink.net> wrote:
> From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
>
> > if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
>
> Theo wins the day's egregious overuse of the "cat" command award for the
> day. "spamc <sample-spam.txt" works just as well and saves typing.
>
> {^_-}
>
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by jdow <jd...@earthlink.net>.
From: "Theo Van Dinter" <fe...@apache.org>
> if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
Theo wins the day's egregious overuse of the "cat" command award for the
day. "spamc <sample-spam.txt" works just as well and saves typing.
{^_-}
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:54:20PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> this show SA is running, right?
> root 5815 0.0 1.0 43900 10172 ?? Ss Fri12PM 0:01.07
> /usr/bin/spamd -d
> root 5816 0.0 1.5 43932 15788 ?? S Fri12PM 0:00.75
> spamd child
> ...
It does seem to be, yes.
> this is in procmailrc
>
> :0fw
> | /usr/bin/spamc
Ok, so you call spamc.
Are you sure procmail is being called? Is there anything in your procmail log
(try enabling VERBOSE)? Is there anything in the system log from spamd? What
happens if you run "cat sample-spam.txt | spamc"?
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
"I'll be Bach." - Johann Sebastian Schwarzenegger
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by liyas_m m <li...@gmail.com>.
this show SA is running, right?
root 5815 0.0 1.0 43900 10172 ?? Ss Fri12PM 0:01.07
/usr/bin/spamd -d
root 5816 0.0 1.5 43932 15788 ?? S Fri12PM 0:00.75
spamd child
...
this is in procmailrc
:0fw
| /usr/bin/spamc
:0:
* ^X-Spam-Status: Yes
* ^Subject: ***SPAM***
! aliasmohd@utm.my
On 7/3/05, Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org> wrote:
> On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:41:09PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> > I dont see any of these in the header of th eemails received.
> >
> > X-Spam-Status
> > X-Spam-Checker-Version:
> > X-Spam-Level:
> >
> > how come?
>
> You don't specify how you're calling SA, but my guess is that you're
> not actually filtering your mail.
>
> --
> Randomly Generated Tagline:
> The value of a program is proportional to the weight of its output.
>
>
>
Re: no X Spam Status
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Sun, Jul 03, 2005 at 12:41:09PM +0800, liyas_m m wrote:
> I dont see any of these in the header of th eemails received.
>
> X-Spam-Status
> X-Spam-Checker-Version:
> X-Spam-Level:
>
> how come?
You don't specify how you're calling SA, but my guess is that you're
not actually filtering your mail.
--
Randomly Generated Tagline:
The value of a program is proportional to the weight of its output.