You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> on 2016/04/23 17:43:36 UTC

Really funny test failure on Windows

This just happened when I was running trunk tests in a Windows 10 VM
(with Windows Defender enabled). I see now that the test is actually
expected to tickle the interest of antivirus software. :)

-- Brane

C:\Users\brane\svndev\subversion-trunk>type Release\fails.log
[[[
W: UNEXPECTED STDERR:
W: svn: E720225: Can't open file 'C:\Users\brane\AppData\Local\Temp\svn-5473BE78': Operation did not complete successfully because the file contains a virus or potentially unwanted software.

W: CWD: C:\Users\brane\svndev\subversion-trunk\Release\subversion\tests\cmdline
W: EXCEPTION: SVNUnexpectedStderr
Traceback (most recent call last):
  File "C:\Users\brane\svndev\subversion-trunk\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\main.py", line 1783, in run
    rc = self.pred.run(sandbox)
  File "C:\Users\brane\svndev\subversion-trunk\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\testcase.py", line 178, in run
    result = self.func(sandbox)
  File "C:\Users\brane\svndev\subversion-trunk\subversion\tests\cmdline\patch_tests.py", line 6803, in patch_add_remove_executable
    [], True, True)
  File "C:\Users\brane\svndev\subversion-trunk\subversion\tests\cmdline\svntest\actions.py", line 1259, in run_and_verify_patch
    raise verify.SVNUnexpectedStderr
SVNUnexpectedStderr
FAIL:  patch_tests.py 69: add and remove executable file
]]]


-- Brane

Re: Really funny test failure on Windows

Posted by Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org>.
On 24.04.2016 08:19, Bert Huijben wrote:
>
> I think changing a single byte in the file should fix this… but in
> that case we should also remove the ‘eicar’ reference.
>
>  
>
> I’ve never seen this error being reported via an application though 😊
>
> (I usually disable defender on my workdirs and/or dev VMs unless
> explicitly testing antivirus related issues)
>


I just checked and it turns out that I had an exclusion set up in
Windows Defender for the directory where I do all of the
Subversion-related work.

Now I'm confused.

-- Brane

 
>
> *From: *Ivan Zhakov <ma...@visualsvn.com>
> *Sent: *zaterdag 23 april 2016 20:08
> *To: *Branko Čibej <ma...@apache.org>
> *Cc: *Subversion Development <ma...@subversion.apache.org>
> *Subject: *Re: Really funny test failure on Windows
>
>  
>
> On 23 April 2016 at 18:43, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > This just happened when I was running trunk tests in a Windows 10 VM
>
> > (with Windows Defender enabled). I see now that the test is actually
>
> > expected to tickle the interest of antivirus software. :)
>
> I've raised this problem month ago on dev@s.a.o:
>
> http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2016-03/0043.shtml
>
>  
>
>  
>
> -- 
>
> Ivan Zhakov
>
>  
>

RE: Really funny test failure on Windows

Posted by Bert Huijben <be...@qqmail.nl>.
I think changing a single byte in the file should fix this… but in that case we should also remove the ‘eicar’ reference.

I’ve never seen this error being reported via an application though 😊
(I usually disable defender on my workdirs and/or dev VMs unless explicitly testing antivirus related issues)

Bert

Sent from Mail for Windows 10

From: Ivan Zhakov
Sent: zaterdag 23 april 2016 20:08
To: Branko Čibej
Cc: Subversion Development
Subject: Re: Really funny test failure on Windows

On 23 April 2016 at 18:43, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> This just happened when I was running trunk tests in a Windows 10 VM
> (with Windows Defender enabled). I see now that the test is actually
> expected to tickle the interest of antivirus software. :)
I've raised this problem month ago on dev@s.a.o:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2016-03/0043.shtml


-- 
Ivan Zhakov

Re: Really funny test failure on Windows

Posted by Ivan Zhakov <iv...@visualsvn.com>.
On 23 April 2016 at 18:43, Branko Čibej <br...@apache.org> wrote:
> This just happened when I was running trunk tests in a Windows 10 VM
> (with Windows Defender enabled). I see now that the test is actually
> expected to tickle the interest of antivirus software. :)
I've raised this problem month ago on dev@s.a.o:
http://svn.haxx.se/dev/archive-2016-03/0043.shtml


-- 
Ivan Zhakov