You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2007/01/16 23:09:27 UTC
[Bug 5296] New: RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5296
Summary: RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
Product: Spamassassin
Version: SVN Trunk (Latest Devel Version)
Platform: Other
OS/Version: other
Status: NEW
Severity: normal
Priority: P5
Component: spamc/spamd
AssignedTo: dev@spamassassin.apache.org
ReportedBy: jm@jmason.org
as part of my EC2 hacking, I've come up with a new spamd protocol verb, HEADERS,
which just returns the headers of the rewritten message instead of the entire
message and body. This allows full "report_safe 0" rewriting to work, while
drastically reducing the bandwidth required between spamd and spamc. I've also
added a -A switch to spamc which uses this.
Since it's a new protocol verb, I've had to bump the spamd protocol version to
1.4; I also fixed up the spamd/PROTOCOL file to include this, along with a bit
of other stuff that had been missed since the last protocol revision (I thought
we were on 1.2; turns out it's been 1.3 since 3.1.0 at least... but we'd
forgotten to update the PROTOCOL file to note this.)
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5296] RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5296
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Status|NEW |RESOLVED
Resolution| |FIXED
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2007-01-17 06:55 -------
ok, applied!
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5296] RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5296
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2007-01-16 14:10 -------
Created an attachment (id=3827)
--> (http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/attachment.cgi?id=3827&action=view)
implementation
Here's the patch. let me know if you have any objections to this going into
3.2.0...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5296] RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5296
------- Additional Comments From parkerm@pobox.com 2007-01-16 14:29 -------
Seems fine to me. I wonder if -A is even needed? Not every command line option
has to have a single letter version.
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5296] RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5296
jm@jmason.org changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
Target Milestone|Undefined |3.2.0
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.
[Bug 5296] RFE: spamc -A/--headers switch
Posted by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org.
http://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=5296
------- Additional Comments From jm@jmason.org 2007-01-16 14:39 -------
yeah, good point -- "-A" doesn't really fit anyway, I don't think I'd miss it.
might as well just use the long form only...
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug, or are watching the assignee.