You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@spamassassin.apache.org by bu...@bugzilla.spamassassin.org on 2011/10/23 00:49:30 UTC
[Bug 6501] RCVD_IN_PBL wrongly catching IP addresses in
X-Originating-IP header
https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/show_bug.cgi?id=6501
Roman <ws...@starkov.name> changed:
What |Removed |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
CC| |ws.apache@starkov.name
--- Comment #9 from Roman <ws...@starkov.name> 2011-10-22 22:49:30 UTC ---
(In reply to comment #8)
> Is there any rule in the email related RFCs that says, that there has to be any
> header information about authentication?
> If yes, please tell me where.
Yes, it's called RFC3848, which I learned about from this post
http://www.gossamer-threads.com/lists/spamassassin/users/162165#162165
I believe the only MTA that doesn't support this RFC and is still in widespread
use is qmail. There is a patch for qmail but you'll have to apply it yourself.
Leaving aside rants at how rubbish this whole thing is, I'd argue that this is
not a bug in SpamAssassin indeed.
P.S. I've been sending such "buggy" email for years and it seems that it never
gets filtered as spam, which suggests that most people don't use rules like
RCVD_IN_PBL when filtering spam. This might be why unpatched qmail remains
usable to this day.
--
Configure bugmail: https://issues.apache.org/SpamAssassin/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are the assignee for the bug.