You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@harmony.apache.org by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com> on 2010/03/09 16:08:37 UTC

Distributing milestones (was: Re: [result] [vote] Declare r917296 as 6.0 Milestone 1)

On 09/Mar/2010 14:53, Mark Hindess wrote:
> It feels like we have some consensus.  So, please can people sanity
> check the binary artifacts in:
> 
>   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/

Will do.

> I'll aim to move them to the /dist/ tree tomorrow or earlier if I get
> confirmation that they've been checked.

What's the plan for restructuring the dist directory to accommodate the
6.0 milestones?

/dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M13
/dist/harmony/milestones/6.0/M1

and leave the existing archive directories

/dist/harmony/milestones/M1
...

or maybe

/dist/harmony/milestones/M13
/dist/harmony/milestones/6.0M1

or ??

> Thanks for helping move this forward.

I'll help to update the download page if that helps.

Regards,
Tim

Re: Distributing milestones

Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4B...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> On 09/Mar/2010 15:57, Mark Hindess wrote:
> > In message <4B...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
> >> On 09/Mar/2010 14:53, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >>> It feels like we have some consensus.  So, please can people sanity
> >>> check the binary artifacts in:
> >>>
> >>>   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/
> >> Will do.
> > 
> > Thanks.
> 
> The binaries look sane to me.  Basic sniff testing works fine.

Okay.  I populated the /dist/ tree at 17:20 UTC.

> (It would be advisable to upgrade your signing key to 4096bit at some
> point.)

Yes.  That's on my todo list.

Thanks,
-Mark.

Re: Distributing milestones

Posted by Tim Ellison <t....@gmail.com>.
On 09/Mar/2010 15:57, Mark Hindess wrote:
> In message <4B...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>> On 09/Mar/2010 14:53, Mark Hindess wrote:
>>> It feels like we have some consensus.  So, please can people sanity
>>> check the binary artifacts in:
>>>
>>>   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/
>> Will do.
> 
> Thanks.

The binaries look sane to me.  Basic sniff testing works fine.

(It would be advisable to upgrade your signing key to 4096bit at some
point.)

Regards,
Tim

>>> I'll aim to move them to the /dist/ tree tomorrow or earlier if I
>>> get confirmation that they've been checked.
>> What's the plan for restructuring the dist directory to accommodate
>> the 6.0 milestones?
>>
>> /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M13
>> /dist/harmony/milestones/6.0/M1
>>
>> and leave the existing archive directories
>>
>> /dist/harmony/milestones/M1
>> ...
> 
> This was the option that I had in mind.
> 
> Additionally, I was thinking that I'd probably create symlinks for:
> 
>   /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M1 => ../M1
>   /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M2 => ../M2
> 
> and remove them once they'd made it to the archive.  This would mean
> there'd be a single archive URL to reference all the 5.0 milestone
> releases.
> 
>> or maybe
>>
>> /dist/harmony/milestones/M13
>> /dist/harmony/milestones/6.0M1
> 
> Ick!
> 
>> or ??
>>
>>> Thanks for helping move this forward.
>> I'll help to update the download page if that helps.
> 
> Excellent.  Thanks.
> 
> Regards,
>  Mark.
> 
> 
>

Re: Distributing milestones (was: Re: [result] [vote] Declare r917296 as 6.0 Milestone 1)

Posted by Mark Hindess <ma...@googlemail.com>.
In message <4B...@gmail.com>, Tim Ellison writes:
>
> On 09/Mar/2010 14:53, Mark Hindess wrote:
> >
> > It feels like we have some consensus.  So, please can people sanity
> > check the binary artifacts in:
> > 
> >   http://people.apache.org/~hindessm/milestones/
> 
> Will do.

Thanks.

> > I'll aim to move them to the /dist/ tree tomorrow or earlier if I
> > get confirmation that they've been checked.
>
> What's the plan for restructuring the dist directory to accommodate
> the 6.0 milestones?
> 
> /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M13
> /dist/harmony/milestones/6.0/M1
> 
> and leave the existing archive directories
> 
> /dist/harmony/milestones/M1
> ...

This was the option that I had in mind.

Additionally, I was thinking that I'd probably create symlinks for:

  /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M1 => ../M1
  /dist/harmony/milestones/5.0/M2 => ../M2

and remove them once they'd made it to the archive.  This would mean
there'd be a single archive URL to reference all the 5.0 milestone
releases.

> or maybe
> 
> /dist/harmony/milestones/M13
> /dist/harmony/milestones/6.0M1

Ick!

> or ??
> 
> > Thanks for helping move this forward.
> 
> I'll help to update the download page if that helps.

Excellent.  Thanks.

Regards,
 Mark.