You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to solr-user@lucene.apache.org by Ramo Karahasan <ra...@googlemail.com> on 2012/03/12 09:12:49 UTC
Performance (responsetime) on request
Hi,
i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same
hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the second
a solr instance. In solr I use the following
<fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField">
<analyzer type="index">
<!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>-->
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2" maxGramSize="25"
/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
<!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
maxGramSize="25" />-->
</analyzer>
<analyzer type="query">
<!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />-->
<tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2" maxGramSize="25"
/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
<fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
<analyzer>
<tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
<filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1"
generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1"
catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
<filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
</analyzer>
</fieldType>
If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get response
times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr, so that I get
faster results?
I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to configure
here.
Thanks,
Ramo
Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
Posted by Dmitry Kan <dm...@gmail.com>.
This page should help you:
http://wiki.apache.org/solr/SolrCaching
-- Dmitry
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:37 PM, Ramo Karahasan <
ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> thanks for you advice. Do you have any documentation on that? I'm not
> sure, how and where to configure this stuff and what impact it has.
>
> Thans,
> Ramo
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry.kan@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 16:21
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
>
> you can optimize the documentCache by setting maxSize to some decent
> value, like 2000. Also configure some meaningful warming queries in the
> solrconfig.
> When increasing the cache size, monitor the RAM usage, as that can
> starting increasing as well.
> Do you / would you need to use filter queries? Those can speed up search
> as well through the usage of filterCache.
>
> Dmitry
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Ramo Karahasan <
> ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> > this are the results form the solr admin page for cache:
> >
> >
> > name: queryResultCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
> > version: 1.0
> > description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
> > stats: lookups : 376
> > hits : 246
> > hitratio : 0.65
> > inserts : 130
> > evictions : 0
> > size : 130
> > warmupTime : 0
> > cumulative_lookups : 2994
> > cumulative_hits : 1934
> > cumulative_hitratio : 0.64
> > cumulative_inserts : 1060
> > cumulative_evictions : 409
> >
> > name: fieldCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrFieldCacheMBean
> > version: 1.0
> > description: Provides introspection of the Lucene FieldCache, this is
> > **NOT** a cache that is managed by Solr.
> > stats: entries_count : 0
> > insanity_count : 0
> >
> > name: documentCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
> > version: 1.0
> > description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
> > stats: lookups : 13416
> > hits : 11787
> > hitratio : 0.87
> > inserts : 1629
> > evictions : 1089
> > size : 512
> > warmupTime : 0
> > cumulative_lookups : 100012
> > cumulative_hits : 86959
> > cumulative_hitratio : 0.86
> > cumulative_inserts : 13053
> > cumulative_evictions : 11914
> >
> > name: fieldValueCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> > version: 1.0
> > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10,
> > minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false)
> > stats: lookups : 0
> > hits : 0
> > hitratio : 0.00
> > inserts : 0
> > evictions : 0
> > size : 0
> > warmupTime : 0
> > cumulative_lookups : 0
> > cumulative_hits : 0
> > cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
> > cumulative_inserts : 0
> > cumulative_evictions : 0
> >
> > name: filterCache
> > class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> > version: 1.0
> > description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512,
> > minSize=460, acceptableSize=486, cleanupThread=false)
> > stats: lookups : 0
> > hits : 0
> > hitratio : 0.00
> > inserts : 0
> > evictions : 0
> > size : 0
> > warmupTime : 0
> > cumulative_lookups : 0
> > cumulative_hits : 0
> > cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
> > cumulative_inserts : 0
> > cumulative_evictions : 0
> >
> >
> > Is there something tob e optimized?
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Ramo
> >
> > -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> > Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry.kan@gmail.com]
> > Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 15:06
> > An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> > Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
> >
> > If you look at solr admin page / statistics of cache, you could check
> > the evictions of different types of cache. If some of them are larger
> > than zero, try minimizing them by increasing the corresponding cache
> > params in the solrconfig.xml.
> >
> > On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ramo Karahasan <
> > ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
> >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same
> > > hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the
> > > second a solr instance. In solr I use the following
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > <fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField">
> > >
> > > <analyzer type="index">
> > >
> > > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>-->
> > >
> > > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >
> > > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> > > maxGramSize="25"
> > > />
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >
> > > <!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> > > maxGramSize="25" />-->
> > >
> > > </analyzer>
> > >
> > > <analyzer type="query">
> > >
> > > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />-->
> > >
> > > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >
> > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >
> > > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> > > maxGramSize="25"
> > > />
> > >
> > > </analyzer>
> > >
> > > </fieldType>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField"
> > > positionIncrementGap="100">
> > >
> > > <analyzer>
> > >
> > > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> > >
> > > <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1"
> > > generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1"
> > > catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
> > >
> > > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> > >
> > > </analyzer>
> > >
> > > </fieldType>
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get
> > > response times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr,
> > > so that I get faster results?
> > >
> > > I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to
> > > configure here.
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > > Thanks,
> > >
> > > Ramo
> > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Regards,
> >
> > Dmitry Kan
> >
> >
>
>
AW: Performance (responsetime) on request
Posted by Ramo Karahasan <ra...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
thanks for you advice. Do you have any documentation on that? I'm not sure, how and where to configure this stuff and what impact it has.
Thans,
Ramo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry.kan@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 16:21
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
you can optimize the documentCache by setting maxSize to some decent value, like 2000. Also configure some meaningful warming queries in the solrconfig.
When increasing the cache size, monitor the RAM usage, as that can starting increasing as well.
Do you / would you need to use filter queries? Those can speed up search as well through the usage of filterCache.
Dmitry
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Ramo Karahasan < ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this are the results form the solr admin page for cache:
>
>
> name: queryResultCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
> stats: lookups : 376
> hits : 246
> hitratio : 0.65
> inserts : 130
> evictions : 0
> size : 130
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 2994
> cumulative_hits : 1934
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.64
> cumulative_inserts : 1060
> cumulative_evictions : 409
>
> name: fieldCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrFieldCacheMBean
> version: 1.0
> description: Provides introspection of the Lucene FieldCache, this is
> **NOT** a cache that is managed by Solr.
> stats: entries_count : 0
> insanity_count : 0
>
> name: documentCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
> stats: lookups : 13416
> hits : 11787
> hitratio : 0.87
> inserts : 1629
> evictions : 1089
> size : 512
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 100012
> cumulative_hits : 86959
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.86
> cumulative_inserts : 13053
> cumulative_evictions : 11914
>
> name: fieldValueCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10,
> minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false)
> stats: lookups : 0
> hits : 0
> hitratio : 0.00
> inserts : 0
> evictions : 0
> size : 0
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 0
> cumulative_hits : 0
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
> cumulative_inserts : 0
> cumulative_evictions : 0
>
> name: filterCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512,
> minSize=460, acceptableSize=486, cleanupThread=false)
> stats: lookups : 0
> hits : 0
> hitratio : 0.00
> inserts : 0
> evictions : 0
> size : 0
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 0
> cumulative_hits : 0
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
> cumulative_inserts : 0
> cumulative_evictions : 0
>
>
> Is there something tob e optimized?
>
> Thanks,
> Ramo
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry.kan@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 15:06
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
>
> If you look at solr admin page / statistics of cache, you could check
> the evictions of different types of cache. If some of them are larger
> than zero, try minimizing them by increasing the corresponding cache
> params in the solrconfig.xml.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ramo Karahasan <
> ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same
> > hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the
> > second a solr instance. In solr I use the following
> >
> >
> >
> > <fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField">
> >
> > <analyzer type="index">
> >
> > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>-->
> >
> > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> > maxGramSize="25"
> > />
> >
> >
> >
> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >
> > <!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> > maxGramSize="25" />-->
> >
> > </analyzer>
> >
> > <analyzer type="query">
> >
> > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />-->
> >
> > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> > maxGramSize="25"
> > />
> >
> > </analyzer>
> >
> > </fieldType>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField"
> > positionIncrementGap="100">
> >
> > <analyzer>
> >
> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1"
> > generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1"
> > catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >
> > </analyzer>
> >
> > </fieldType>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get
> > response times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr,
> > so that I get faster results?
> >
> > I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to
> > configure here.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ramo
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dmitry Kan
>
>
Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
Posted by Dmitry Kan <dm...@gmail.com>.
you can optimize the documentCache by setting maxSize to some decent
value, like 2000. Also configure some meaningful warming queries in the
solrconfig.
When increasing the cache size, monitor the RAM usage, as that can starting
increasing as well.
Do you / would you need to use filter queries? Those can speed up search as
well through the usage of filterCache.
Dmitry
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 5:12 PM, Ramo Karahasan <
ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
> this are the results form the solr admin page for cache:
>
>
> name: queryResultCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
> stats: lookups : 376
> hits : 246
> hitratio : 0.65
> inserts : 130
> evictions : 0
> size : 130
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 2994
> cumulative_hits : 1934
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.64
> cumulative_inserts : 1060
> cumulative_evictions : 409
>
> name: fieldCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrFieldCacheMBean
> version: 1.0
> description: Provides introspection of the Lucene FieldCache, this is
> **NOT** a cache that is managed by Solr.
> stats: entries_count : 0
> insanity_count : 0
>
> name: documentCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
> stats: lookups : 13416
> hits : 11787
> hitratio : 0.87
> inserts : 1629
> evictions : 1089
> size : 512
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 100012
> cumulative_hits : 86959
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.86
> cumulative_inserts : 13053
> cumulative_evictions : 11914
>
> name: fieldValueCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10,
> minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false)
> stats: lookups : 0
> hits : 0
> hitratio : 0.00
> inserts : 0
> evictions : 0
> size : 0
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 0
> cumulative_hits : 0
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
> cumulative_inserts : 0
> cumulative_evictions : 0
>
> name: filterCache
> class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
> version: 1.0
> description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512,
> minSize=460, acceptableSize=486, cleanupThread=false)
> stats: lookups : 0
> hits : 0
> hitratio : 0.00
> inserts : 0
> evictions : 0
> size : 0
> warmupTime : 0
> cumulative_lookups : 0
> cumulative_hits : 0
> cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
> cumulative_inserts : 0
> cumulative_evictions : 0
>
>
> Is there something tob e optimized?
>
> Thanks,
> Ramo
>
> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry.kan@gmail.com]
> Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 15:06
> An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
> Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
>
> If you look at solr admin page / statistics of cache, you could check the
> evictions of different types of cache. If some of them are larger than
> zero, try minimizing them by increasing the corresponding cache params in
> the solrconfig.xml.
>
> On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ramo Karahasan <
> ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi,
> >
> >
> >
> > i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same
> > hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the
> > second a solr instance. In solr I use the following
> >
> >
> >
> > <fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField">
> >
> > <analyzer type="index">
> >
> > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>-->
> >
> > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> > maxGramSize="25"
> > />
> >
> >
> >
> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >
> > <!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> > maxGramSize="25" />-->
> >
> > </analyzer>
> >
> > <analyzer type="query">
> >
> > <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />-->
> >
> > <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> > maxGramSize="25"
> > />
> >
> > </analyzer>
> >
> > </fieldType>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField"
> > positionIncrementGap="100">
> >
> > <analyzer>
> >
> > <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1"
> > generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1"
> > catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
> >
> > <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
> >
> > </analyzer>
> >
> > </fieldType>
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get
> > response times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr,
> > so that I get faster results?
> >
> > I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to
> > configure here.
> >
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Ramo
> >
> >
>
>
> --
> Regards,
>
> Dmitry Kan
>
>
AW: Performance (responsetime) on request
Posted by Ramo Karahasan <ra...@googlemail.com>.
Hi,
this are the results form the solr admin page for cache:
name: queryResultCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
version: 1.0
description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
stats: lookups : 376
hits : 246
hitratio : 0.65
inserts : 130
evictions : 0
size : 130
warmupTime : 0
cumulative_lookups : 2994
cumulative_hits : 1934
cumulative_hitratio : 0.64
cumulative_inserts : 1060
cumulative_evictions : 409
name: fieldCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.SolrFieldCacheMBean
version: 1.0
description: Provides introspection of the Lucene FieldCache, this is **NOT** a cache that is managed by Solr.
stats: entries_count : 0
insanity_count : 0
name: documentCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.LRUCache
version: 1.0
description: LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512)
stats: lookups : 13416
hits : 11787
hitratio : 0.87
inserts : 1629
evictions : 1089
size : 512
warmupTime : 0
cumulative_lookups : 100012
cumulative_hits : 86959
cumulative_hitratio : 0.86
cumulative_inserts : 13053
cumulative_evictions : 11914
name: fieldValueCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
version: 1.0
description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=10000, initialSize=10, minSize=9000, acceptableSize=9500, cleanupThread=false)
stats: lookups : 0
hits : 0
hitratio : 0.00
inserts : 0
evictions : 0
size : 0
warmupTime : 0
cumulative_lookups : 0
cumulative_hits : 0
cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
cumulative_inserts : 0
cumulative_evictions : 0
name: filterCache
class: org.apache.solr.search.FastLRUCache
version: 1.0
description: Concurrent LRU Cache(maxSize=512, initialSize=512, minSize=460, acceptableSize=486, cleanupThread=false)
stats: lookups : 0
hits : 0
hitratio : 0.00
inserts : 0
evictions : 0
size : 0
warmupTime : 0
cumulative_lookups : 0
cumulative_hits : 0
cumulative_hitratio : 0.00
cumulative_inserts : 0
cumulative_evictions : 0
Is there something tob e optimized?
Thanks,
Ramo
-----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
Von: Dmitry Kan [mailto:dmitry.kan@gmail.com]
Gesendet: Montag, 12. März 2012 15:06
An: solr-user@lucene.apache.org
Betreff: Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
If you look at solr admin page / statistics of cache, you could check the evictions of different types of cache. If some of them are larger than zero, try minimizing them by increasing the corresponding cache params in the solrconfig.xml.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ramo Karahasan < ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same
> hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the
> second a solr instance. In solr I use the following
>
>
>
> <fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField">
>
> <analyzer type="index">
>
> <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>-->
>
> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> maxGramSize="25"
> />
>
>
>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
> <!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> maxGramSize="25" />-->
>
> </analyzer>
>
> <analyzer type="query">
>
> <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />-->
>
> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> maxGramSize="25"
> />
>
> </analyzer>
>
> </fieldType>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField"
> positionIncrementGap="100">
>
> <analyzer>
>
> <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1"
> generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1"
> catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
> </analyzer>
>
> </fieldType>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get
> response times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr,
> so that I get faster results?
>
> I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to
> configure here.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ramo
>
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan
Re: Performance (responsetime) on request
Posted by Dmitry Kan <dm...@gmail.com>.
If you look at solr admin page / statistics of cache, you could check the
evictions of different types of cache. If some of them are larger than
zero, try minimizing them by increasing the corresponding cache params in
the solrconfig.xml.
On Mon, Mar 12, 2012 at 10:12 AM, Ramo Karahasan <
ramo.karahasan@googlemail.com> wrote:
> Hi,
>
>
>
> i've got two virtual machines in the same subnet at the same
> hostingprovider. On one machine my webapplication is running, on the second
> a solr instance. In solr I use the following
>
>
>
> <fieldType name="text_auto" class="solr.TextField">
>
> <analyzer type="index">
>
> <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory"/>-->
>
> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> maxGramSize="25"
> />
>
>
>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
> <!--<filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="1"
> maxGramSize="25" />-->
>
> </analyzer>
>
> <analyzer type="query">
>
> <!--<tokenizer class="solr.KeywordTokenizerFactory" />-->
>
> <tokenizer class="solr.StandardTokenizerFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.EdgeNGramFilterFactory" minGramSize="2"
> maxGramSize="25"
> />
>
> </analyzer>
>
> </fieldType>
>
>
>
>
>
> <fieldType name="text" class="solr.TextField" positionIncrementGap="100">
>
> <analyzer>
>
> <tokenizer class="solr.WhitespaceTokenizerFactory"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.WordDelimiterFilterFactory" generateWordParts="1"
> generateNumberParts="1" catenateWords="1" catenateNumbers="1"
> catenateAll="0" splitOnCaseChange="1"/>
>
> <filter class="solr.LowerCaseFilterFactory"/>
>
> </analyzer>
>
> </fieldType>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
> If I search from my webapplication in my autosuggest box, I get response
> times of ~500ms per request. Is it possible to "tune" solr, so that I get
> faster results?
>
> I have no special cache configuration, nor I don't know what to configure
> here.
>
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Ramo
>
>
--
Regards,
Dmitry Kan