You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@flex.apache.org by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com> on 2013/06/08 01:06:44 UTC
Adobe bug / jira offline?
Is adobe bugs/jira [1] offline?
[1] http://bugs.adobe.com
-Mark
RE: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Kessler CTR Mark J <ma...@usmc.mil>.
Well what I have been doing so far is . Extracting the code needing to test, verify/fix the issue. Ehen when I mark the issue resolved, I add a comment that has the test code used to produce/test the issue. So I haven't been bringing over the adobe JIRA attachments during those anyways.
But again I realize these will be a low priority. I'll just fiddle with new features a bit until we sort out the bodies.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 12:21 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
It's still work to add test code in comments. Many test cases are FXP
files and some contain binaries like images or screenshots.
The 6GB zip is already up on dropbox if anybody wants to hack at it.
On 6/10/13 9:14 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <ma...@usmc.mil> wrote:
>Well the bright side is that we can delete the attachments from the
>completed issues if we add the test code in comments to our Flex JIRA
>issues. If they are stored by the issue number that would be fine.
>
>
>-Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:18 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
>
>
>
>On 6/10/13 3:01 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <ma...@usmc.mil>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> No I'm not down playing the work of the JIRA migration, I believe
>>that's pretty good. I was speaking from a view of resolving each issue.
>>
>> So if I were to work on a ticket and it says "in the attached
>>example". Then my only solution is to attempt to guess how to recreate a
>>test that causes the problem, if I don't have the attachment.
>Well for now, you can ask me, and I can try to dig up the attachments.
>
>>We don't really need to find a way to force the attachments into our
>>current system. We could just host them somewhere with folders in either
>>the Adobe issue number or the flex issue number.
>That's a possibility. It is 6GB compressed. I supposed I could try to
>expand them in my dropbox folder. Maybe I can see if INFRA can offer a
>site. It still requires "code" to be written as the attachment file names
>are just 0001 and 0002 and don't have their original names. They are
>stored in files by the issue number, but the original filename is kept in
>the central DB.
>
>>
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
It's still work to add test code in comments. Many test cases are FXP
files and some contain binaries like images or screenshots.
The 6GB zip is already up on dropbox if anybody wants to hack at it.
On 6/10/13 9:14 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <ma...@usmc.mil> wrote:
>Well the bright side is that we can delete the attachments from the
>completed issues if we add the test code in comments to our Flex JIRA
>issues. If they are stored by the issue number that would be fine.
>
>
>-Mark
>
>-----Original Message-----
>From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
>Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:18 AM
>To: dev@flex.apache.org
>Subject: Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
>
>
>
>On 6/10/13 3:01 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <ma...@usmc.mil>
>wrote:
>
>>
>> No I'm not down playing the work of the JIRA migration, I believe
>>that's pretty good. I was speaking from a view of resolving each issue.
>>
>> So if I were to work on a ticket and it says "in the attached
>>example". Then my only solution is to attempt to guess how to recreate a
>>test that causes the problem, if I don't have the attachment.
>Well for now, you can ask me, and I can try to dig up the attachments.
>
>>We don't really need to find a way to force the attachments into our
>>current system. We could just host them somewhere with folders in either
>>the Adobe issue number or the flex issue number.
>That's a possibility. It is 6GB compressed. I supposed I could try to
>expand them in my dropbox folder. Maybe I can see if INFRA can offer a
>site. It still requires "code" to be written as the attachment file names
>are just 0001 and 0002 and don't have their original names. They are
>stored in files by the issue number, but the original filename is kept in
>the central DB.
>
>>
>
RE: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Kessler CTR Mark J <ma...@usmc.mil>.
Well the bright side is that we can delete the attachments from the completed issues if we add the test code in comments to our Flex JIRA issues. If they are stored by the issue number that would be fine.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Sent: Monday, June 10, 2013 11:18 AM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
On 6/10/13 3:01 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <ma...@usmc.mil> wrote:
>
> No I'm not down playing the work of the JIRA migration, I believe
>that's pretty good. I was speaking from a view of resolving each issue.
>
> So if I were to work on a ticket and it says "in the attached
>example". Then my only solution is to attempt to guess how to recreate a
>test that causes the problem, if I don't have the attachment.
Well for now, you can ask me, and I can try to dig up the attachments.
>We don't really need to find a way to force the attachments into our
>current system. We could just host them somewhere with folders in either
>the Adobe issue number or the flex issue number.
That's a possibility. It is 6GB compressed. I supposed I could try to
expand them in my dropbox folder. Maybe I can see if INFRA can offer a
site. It still requires "code" to be written as the attachment file names
are just 0001 and 0002 and don't have their original names. They are
stored in files by the issue number, but the original filename is kept in
the central DB.
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/10/13 9:46 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> The problem is that in the zip, there are no friendly file names. There
>> are folders with issues as names, but within each folder are files named
>> 00001, 00002, 00003 with no suffix.
>That's a little ugly.
>
>What about all small files as a start?
>find . -size -10k -exec tar -Pvrf code.tar {} +
Maybe, but you'll miss a lot of test cases in FXP files. And then you'll
have folders with unfriendly names and have to guess what it contains.
I'll eventually find time, but IMO, my priorities are:
1) finish up the mustella tester
2) assist in getting 4.10 out
3) FlexJS stuff
4) More Adobe code donations
5) JIRA attachments
I suppose if you and Mark start constantly bugging me for attachments I'll
end up bumping up the priority.
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> The problem is that in the zip, there are no friendly file names. There
> are folders with issues as names, but within each folder are files named
> 00001, 00002, 00003 with no suffix.
That's a little ugly.
What about all small files as a start?
find . -size -10k -exec tar -Pvrf code.tar {} +
Justin
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
The problem is that in the zip, there are no friendly file names. There
are folders with issues as names, but within each folder are files named
00001, 00002, 00003 with no suffix. The main DB xml has to be parsed to
find the friendly names. I think that requires code and not script as the
xml is rather complex, but AIR and AS should be able to handle it.
On 6/10/13 9:34 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> Maybe, but that still required writing a script/code to filter that out
>> which is the main issue for me.
>Something like this?
>find . -name "*.mxml" -exec tar -Pvrf code.tar {} +
>find . -name "*.as" -exec tar -Pvrf code.tar {} +
>
>etc etc
>
>I'm currently traveling so don't have the bandwidth to download a 6Gb
>file.
>
>Thanks,
>Justin
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> Maybe, but that still required writing a script/code to filter that out
> which is the main issue for me.
Something like this?
find . -name "*.mxml" -exec tar -Pvrf code.tar {} +
find . -name "*.as" -exec tar -Pvrf code.tar {} +
etc etc
I'm currently traveling so don't have the bandwidth to download a 6Gb file.
Thanks,
Justin
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/10/13 9:13 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> That's a possibility. It is 6GB compressed.
>What about just the code attachments? ie .mxml, .as files (and perhaps
>small zip files) that could be a more manageable size and it mostly
>what is required.
Maybe, but that still required writing a script/code to filter that out
which is the main issue for me. I'm not inclined to give it much priority.
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> That's a possibility. It is 6GB compressed.
What about just the code attachments? ie .mxml, .as files (and perhaps small zip files) that could be a more manageable size and it mostly what is required.
Justin
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/10/13 3:01 AM, "Kessler CTR Mark J" <ma...@usmc.mil> wrote:
>
> No I'm not down playing the work of the JIRA migration, I believe
>that's pretty good. I was speaking from a view of resolving each issue.
>
> So if I were to work on a ticket and it says "in the attached
>example". Then my only solution is to attempt to guess how to recreate a
>test that causes the problem, if I don't have the attachment.
Well for now, you can ask me, and I can try to dig up the attachments.
>We don't really need to find a way to force the attachments into our
>current system. We could just host them somewhere with folders in either
>the Adobe issue number or the flex issue number.
That's a possibility. It is 6GB compressed. I supposed I could try to
expand them in my dropbox folder. Maybe I can see if INFRA can offer a
site. It still requires "code" to be written as the attachment file names
are just 0001 and 0002 and don't have their original names. They are
stored in files by the issue number, but the original filename is kept in
the central DB.
>
RE: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Kessler CTR Mark J <ma...@usmc.mil>.
No I'm not down playing the work of the JIRA migration, I believe that's pretty good. I was speaking from a view of resolving each issue.
So if I were to work on a ticket and it says "in the attached example". Then my only solution is to attempt to guess how to recreate a test that causes the problem, if I don't have the attachment. We don't really need to find a way to force the attachments into our current system. We could just host them somewhere with folders in either the Adobe issue number or the flex issue number.
-Mark
-----Original Message-----
From: Alex Harui [mailto:aharui@adobe.com]
Sent: Saturday, June 08, 2013 11:57 PM
To: dev@flex.apache.org
Subject: Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Not sure what you mean by "properly". Because of the way JIRA databases
work, it is a ton of work to migrate JIRA systems. You need to have the
same user names in the destination system and/or map to new names which is
impractical especially given that I believe a lot of the Adobe JIRA users
are simply gone from the world of Flex. So, the best I think we can do is
what we've done, except that we didn't get attachments and may have messed
up some of the statuses, duplicated some issues and probably missed a few
as well.
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
Not sure what you mean by "properly". Because of the way JIRA databases
work, it is a ton of work to migrate JIRA systems. You need to have the
same user names in the destination system and/or map to new names which is
impractical especially given that I believe a lot of the Adobe JIRA users
are simply gone from the world of Flex. So, the best I think we can do is
what we've done, except that we didn't get attachments and may have messed
up some of the statuses, duplicated some issues and probably missed a few
as well.
On 6/8/13 7:56 PM, "Mark Kessler" <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>Well not sure what to do with them really. Wouldn't mind just knocking
>some of them out from time to time. But if you can't replicate them
>properly it would be nice at least downgrade them.
>
>-Mark
>
>
>On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>> On 6/8/13 7:07 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>>
>> >Hi,
>> >
>> >> You probably don't have much time to write the tools atm either,
>>you've
>> >> been busy. Should we change the old Adobe imported ones so they
>>don't
>> >>show
>> >> up as major / unassigned issues?
>> >-1 Until we know that they are still not bugs that effects the current
>> >SDK I'd leave them open.
>> If your goal is just to downgrade them from major to minor but leave
>>them
>> open, I guess I'm ok with that, but it would be better if you could
>>check
>> the vote count before you do that. I would argue if they had more than
>> two or more votes they could still be considered "major". The number of
>> votes did not import from Adobe but should be in the comments as a text
>> string.
>>
>>
>> -Alex
>>
>>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
Well not sure what to do with them really. Wouldn't mind just knocking
some of them out from time to time. But if you can't replicate them
properly it would be nice at least downgrade them.
-Mark
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 11:13 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/8/13 7:07 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>
> >Hi,
> >
> >> You probably don't have much time to write the tools atm either, you've
> >> been busy. Should we change the old Adobe imported ones so they don't
> >>show
> >> up as major / unassigned issues?
> >-1 Until we know that they are still not bugs that effects the current
> >SDK I'd leave them open.
> If your goal is just to downgrade them from major to minor but leave them
> open, I guess I'm ok with that, but it would be better if you could check
> the vote count before you do that. I would argue if they had more than
> two or more votes they could still be considered "major". The number of
> votes did not import from Adobe but should be in the comments as a text
> string.
>
>
> -Alex
>
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/8/13 7:07 AM, "Justin Mclean" <ju...@classsoftware.com> wrote:
>Hi,
>
>> You probably don't have much time to write the tools atm either, you've
>> been busy. Should we change the old Adobe imported ones so they don't
>>show
>> up as major / unassigned issues?
>-1 Until we know that they are still not bugs that effects the current
>SDK I'd leave them open.
If your goal is just to downgrade them from major to minor but leave them
open, I guess I'm ok with that, but it would be better if you could check
the vote count before you do that. I would argue if they had more than
two or more votes they could still be considered "major". The number of
votes did not import from Adobe but should be in the comments as a text
string.
-Alex
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Justin Mclean <ju...@classsoftware.com>.
Hi,
> You probably don't have much time to write the tools atm either, you've
> been busy. Should we change the old Adobe imported ones so they don't show
> up as major / unassigned issues?
-1 Until we know that they are still not bugs that effects the current SDK I'd leave them open.
Justin
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
I figured you would have a copy of the attachments so I wasn't worried.
But it does make the old issues hard to take care of... even if they are so
old, they are a low-priority lol.
You probably don't have much time to write the tools atm either, you've
been busy. Should we change the old Adobe imported ones so they don't show
up as major / unassigned issues?
-Mark
On Sat, Jun 8, 2013 at 2:44 AM, Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com> wrote:
>
>
> On 6/7/13 4:43 PM, "Mark Kessler" <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> >The new bugbase does not have any of the Adobe Flex tickets in it... or
> >list that it was a product.
> >
> >Does this mean we can mark all those issues from 2007/2008 that have
> >inaccessible (well at least right now) attachments from the Adobe bugs...
> >as resolved / incomplete :P
> >
> Yeah, I thought they were going to make a static copies of the bugs. I'll
> have to check into that. I have almost all of the attachments, but there
> is no easy way to re-import them into Apache JIRA. It is on my list to
> write a custom tool to try to create a new import file that retains all of
> the current state of Apache JIRA.
>
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Alex Harui <ah...@adobe.com>.
On 6/7/13 4:43 PM, "Mark Kessler" <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
>The new bugbase does not have any of the Adobe Flex tickets in it... or
>list that it was a product.
>
>Does this mean we can mark all those issues from 2007/2008 that have
>inaccessible (well at least right now) attachments from the Adobe bugs...
>as resolved / incomplete :P
>
Yeah, I thought they were going to make a static copies of the bugs. I'll
have to check into that. I have almost all of the attachments, but there
is no easy way to re-import them into Apache JIRA. It is on my list to
write a custom tool to try to create a new import file that retains all of
the current state of Apache JIRA.
>
>
>-Mark
>
>
>On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Mark Kessler
><ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
>
>> I can't login to that new one using my adobe account. The one that I
>> could log into the old bugs.adobe.com with. It wont let me create a new
>> account with that name, so it must have the ability see it already
>>exists.
>>
>> Going to make the bugs links in our JIRA harder to follow now.
>>
>>
>> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Marcus Fritze <
>> marcus.fritze@googlemail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I think this was the old issue management system. The "new" one is
>>>
>>> https://bugbase.adobe.com
>>>
>>> Marcus
>>>
>>> Am 08.06.2013 um 01:06 schrieb Mark Kessler
>>><kesslerconsulting@gmail.com
>>> >:
>>>
>>> > Is adobe bugs/jira [1] offline?
>>> >
>>> > [1] http://bugs.adobe.com
>>> >
>>> > -Mark
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
The new bugbase does not have any of the Adobe Flex tickets in it... or
list that it was a product.
Does this mean we can mark all those issues from 2007/2008 that have
inaccessible (well at least right now) attachments from the Adobe bugs...
as resolved / incomplete :P
-Mark
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:25 PM, Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>wrote:
> I can't login to that new one using my adobe account. The one that I
> could log into the old bugs.adobe.com with. It wont let me create a new
> account with that name, so it must have the ability see it already exists.
>
> Going to make the bugs links in our JIRA harder to follow now.
>
>
> On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Marcus Fritze <
> marcus.fritze@googlemail.com> wrote:
>
>> I think this was the old issue management system. The "new" one is
>>
>> https://bugbase.adobe.com
>>
>> Marcus
>>
>> Am 08.06.2013 um 01:06 schrieb Mark Kessler <kesslerconsulting@gmail.com
>> >:
>>
>> > Is adobe bugs/jira [1] offline?
>> >
>> > [1] http://bugs.adobe.com
>> >
>> > -Mark
>>
>>
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>.
I can't login to that new one using my adobe account. The one that I could
log into the old bugs.adobe.com with. It wont let me create a new account
with that name, so it must have the ability see it already exists.
Going to make the bugs links in our JIRA harder to follow now.
On Fri, Jun 7, 2013 at 7:13 PM, Marcus Fritze
<ma...@googlemail.com>wrote:
> I think this was the old issue management system. The "new" one is
>
> https://bugbase.adobe.com
>
> Marcus
>
> Am 08.06.2013 um 01:06 schrieb Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>:
>
> > Is adobe bugs/jira [1] offline?
> >
> > [1] http://bugs.adobe.com
> >
> > -Mark
>
>
Re: Adobe bug / jira offline?
Posted by Marcus Fritze <ma...@googlemail.com>.
I think this was the old issue management system. The "new" one is
https://bugbase.adobe.com
Marcus
Am 08.06.2013 um 01:06 schrieb Mark Kessler <ke...@gmail.com>:
> Is adobe bugs/jira [1] offline?
>
> [1] http://bugs.adobe.com
>
> -Mark