You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@oozie.apache.org by "Robert Kanter (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/09/13 20:45:21 UTC
[jira] [Commented] (OOZIE-2584) Eliminate Thread.sleep() calls in
TestMemoryLocks
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2584?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15488367#comment-15488367 ]
Robert Kanter commented on OOZIE-2584:
--------------------------------------
+1
> Eliminate Thread.sleep() calls in TestMemoryLocks
> -------------------------------------------------
>
> Key: OOZIE-2584
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OOZIE-2584
> Project: Oozie
> Issue Type: Bug
> Reporter: Peter Bacsko
> Assignee: Peter Bacsko
> Priority: Minor
> Attachments: OOZIE-2584-001.patch, OOZIE-2584-002.patch
>
>
> There are a lot of Thread.sleep() calls in TestMemoryLocks.
> For example:
> {code}
> new Thread(l1).start();
> Thread.sleep(500);
> new Thread(l2).start();
> Thread.sleep(500);
> {code}
> This solution is very fragile. On a slower build machine, Thread2 might actually start earlier than Thread1, causing test failure.
> Eliminate sleeps and use a more stable approach for start/stop coordination (possibly CountDownLatches).
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)