You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@poi.apache.org by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> on 2018/11/19 23:47:10 UTC
[VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Hi,
I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.1 (RC1).
The most notable changes in this release are:
- dependency updates to XMLBeans 3.0.2 / Bouncycastle 1.60
- XSSF: import chart on drawing
- XDDF: Define XDDF user model for text body, its paragraphs and text runs
- OPC: fixes on the newly introduced commons compress usage
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/4.0.1-RC1/
All tests pass. ASC files verify and SHA* are correct.
There's no clutter in the src/bin packages.
There's a new OOXMLLite mechanism, please also check poi-ooxml-schemas.
Please vote to release the artifacts.
The vote keeps open until we have have feedback from TIKA and a consent on the govdocs results.
Planned release announcement date is 2018-11-26.
Here is my +1
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by "pj.fanning" <fa...@yahoo.com>.
I'm +1 -- the fix can wait till 4.0.2 and there is the workaround to use full
schema jar.
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by "pj.fanning" <fa...@yahoo.com>.
Tim - would you be able to provide some sample files and we can add some
regression tests?
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by "pj.fanning" <fa...@yahoo.com>.
The real fix is https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62692 -
XMLBeans-519 fixes a similar issue in XMLBeans (the SAXHelper code in
XMLBeans is basically a copy/paste of POI equivalent).
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by "pj.fanning" <fa...@yahoo.com>.
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62943 fix was to bring back a
try catch block around the code that had been removed in 4.0.0.
The 4.0.0 issue seems to affect users that have very old parsers - typically
part of Application Servers that have their own non-standard parsers.
I'm happy to have someone review the change but I think it is fixed.
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
If possible we should also review
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=62943 and ensure 4.0.1 does
it correctly as it sounds as if we may have broken compatibility with JDK 8
somehow.
Dominik.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 2:34 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> Sorry, now that I've figured out what the problem was, I'm -1. Y,
> let's respin.
> On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 4:34 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> > Hi Tim,
> >
> > On 21.11.18 19:26, Tim Allison wrote:
> > > This looks like a regression.
> >
> >
> > Please make your mind up, if this is a "-1".
> >
> > Creating a new RC is not a big deal, I only think about the hours of
> computing power needed to process the common crawl.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Sorry, now that I've figured out what the problem was, I'm -1. Y,
let's respin.
On Thu, Nov 22, 2018 at 4:34 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> On 21.11.18 19:26, Tim Allison wrote:
> > This looks like a regression.
>
>
> Please make your mind up, if this is a "-1".
>
> Creating a new RC is not a big deal, I only think about the hours of computing power needed to process the common crawl.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi Tim,
On 21.11.18 19:26, Tim Allison wrote:
> This looks like a regression.
Please make your mind up, if this is a "-1".
Creating a new RC is not a big deal, I only think about the hours of computing power needed to process the common crawl.
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
In the debugger:
XWPFHeaderFooterPolicy hfPolicy = document.getHeaderFooterPolicy();
the hfPolicy in 4.0.1 has nothing in it; whereas in 4.0.0, there's a
firstPageHeader (header3.xml), an evenPageHeader (header1.xml), a
defaultHeader (header2.xml) and a defaultFooter(footer1).
This looks like a regression.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:56 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> >These were in the header...I have to step away from the keyboard for
> now...any ideas?
>
> I confirmed this by flipping btwn 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 in our dependencies
> and using our Tika's SNAPSHOT for both. This is not caused by a
> different version of Tika.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
>These were in the header...I have to step away from the keyboard for
now...any ideas?
I confirmed this by flipping btwn 4.0.0 and 4.0.1 in our dependencies
and using our Tika's SNAPSHOT for both. This is not caused by a
different version of Tika.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:53 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Y, my suspicion holds up. If you look at TOP_10_UNIQUE_TOKEN_DIFFS_A
> in content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx, there aren't any unique words
> we were extracting with 4.0.0 that we're not extracting with 4.0.1 in
> the vast majority of ppt files. Note, too, that while the number of
> tokens differs, the number of unique tokens does not...for the
> majority of ppt.
>
> It looks like we have lost some content docx template files, e.g.:
> http://162.242.228.174/docs/commoncrawl2/KQ/KQQ5VZ6BBBRCZPY4GDUIEMVPSGABOMM4
>
> We used to get 17 unique words from this, and we now get just
> 1...we've lost: de: 2 | la: 2 | 03: 1 | 06: 1 | 1: 1 | 16: 1 | 2009: 1
> | 3: 1 | conciencia: 1 | despertar: 1
>
> These were in the header...I have to step away from the keyboard for
> now...any ideas?
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:37 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > Reports are available here:
> > http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_4_0_1-rc1.tgz
> >
> > We have a bunch less content in ppt, but I _think_ this is because at
> > the Tika level we used to duplicate notes content, and we've fixed
> > that bug. So, I think this is an improvement, but I need to check.
> > On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:05 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 21.11.18 10:47, pj.fanning wrote:
> > > > I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
> > >
> > > Is this now a "-1", i.e. a must-have otherwise we get a lot of stackoverflow messages complaining about it
> > >
> > > ... or a "0-", i.e. nice-to-have, but until 4.0.2 is out, the users can use the full-schema
> > >
> > >
> > > I'm asking about this, as there were already a few changes to the trunk since I've provided the RC and we might have to do another Tika- / POI- common crawl run again... which I would like to avoid.
> > >
> > > Andi
> > >
> > >
> > > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> > >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Y, my suspicion holds up. If you look at TOP_10_UNIQUE_TOKEN_DIFFS_A
in content_diffs_with_exceptions.xlsx, there aren't any unique words
we were extracting with 4.0.0 that we're not extracting with 4.0.1 in
the vast majority of ppt files. Note, too, that while the number of
tokens differs, the number of unique tokens does not...for the
majority of ppt.
It looks like we have lost some content docx template files, e.g.:
http://162.242.228.174/docs/commoncrawl2/KQ/KQQ5VZ6BBBRCZPY4GDUIEMVPSGABOMM4
We used to get 17 unique words from this, and we now get just
1...we've lost: de: 2 | la: 2 | 03: 1 | 06: 1 | 1: 1 | 16: 1 | 2009: 1
| 3: 1 | conciencia: 1 | despertar: 1
These were in the header...I have to step away from the keyboard for
now...any ideas?
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:37 PM Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Reports are available here:
> http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_4_0_1-rc1.tgz
>
> We have a bunch less content in ppt, but I _think_ this is because at
> the Tika level we used to duplicate notes content, and we've fixed
> that bug. So, I think this is an improvement, but I need to check.
> On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:05 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> >
> > On 21.11.18 10:47, pj.fanning wrote:
> > > I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
> >
> > Is this now a "-1", i.e. a must-have otherwise we get a lot of stackoverflow messages complaining about it
> >
> > ... or a "0-", i.e. nice-to-have, but until 4.0.2 is out, the users can use the full-schema
> >
> >
> > I'm asking about this, as there were already a few changes to the trunk since I've provided the RC and we might have to do another Tika- / POI- common crawl run again... which I would like to avoid.
> >
> > Andi
> >
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
> >
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Reports are available here:
http://162.242.228.174/reports/reports_poi_4_0_1-rc1.tgz
We have a bunch less content in ppt, but I _think_ this is because at
the Tika level we used to duplicate notes content, and we've fixed
that bug. So, I think this is an improvement, but I need to check.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018 at 12:05 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> On 21.11.18 10:47, pj.fanning wrote:
> > I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
>
> Is this now a "-1", i.e. a must-have otherwise we get a lot of stackoverflow messages complaining about it
>
> ... or a "0-", i.e. nice-to-have, but until 4.0.2 is out, the users can use the full-schema
>
>
> I'm asking about this, as there were already a few changes to the trunk since I've provided the RC and we might have to do another Tika- / POI- common crawl run again... which I would like to avoid.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
On 21.11.18 10:47, pj.fanning wrote:
> I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
Is this now a "-1", i.e. a must-have otherwise we get a lot of stackoverflow messages complaining about it
... or a "0-", i.e. nice-to-have, but until 4.0.2 is out, the users can use the full-schema
I'm asking about this, as there were already a few changes to the trunk since I've provided the RC and we might have to do another Tika- / POI- common crawl run again... which I would like to avoid.
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by "pj.fanning" <fa...@yahoo.com>.
I found a few missing classes in poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
We have some gaps in the XDDF testing and this leads to us not adding all
the necessary OOXML classes for XDDF to the poi-ooxml-schemas.jar.
https://github.com/apache/poi/commit/df83dab1a49900d85d9a20c0ee6d5a7a31f0eb9c
--
Sent from: http://apache-poi.1045710.n5.nabble.com/POI-Dev-f2312866.html
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Ok, thanks for the explanation, I am +1 from this point of view then.
Dominik.
On Wed, Nov 21, 2018, 18:00 Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> On 21.11.18 07:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> > However the maven-subdir is missing the directory "ooxml-schemas" now. I
> > think this should still be included, or? In 4.0.0 it contains
> > ooxml-schemas-1.4.jar/ooxml-schemas-1.4-sources.jar and checksums.
>
> I've provided the ooxml-schemas 1.4 as part of the 4.0.0 release, as I had
> change the access to the POIXMLTypeLoader. There hasn't been any change
> regarding the ooxml-schemas AFAIK in 4.0.1, hence I have omit a new version.
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
On 21.11.18 07:09, Dominik Stadler wrote:
> However the maven-subdir is missing the directory "ooxml-schemas" now. I
> think this should still be included, or? In 4.0.0 it contains
> ooxml-schemas-1.4.jar/ooxml-schemas-1.4-sources.jar and checksums.
I've provided the ooxml-schemas 1.4 as part of the 4.0.0 release, as I had change the access to the POIXMLTypeLoader. There hasn't been any change regarding the ooxml-schemas AFAIK in 4.0.1, hence I have omit a new version.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
I started to compare things, -bin-..zip looks good, contents of
poi-ooxml-schemas looks sane.
However the maven-subdir is missing the directory "ooxml-schemas" now. I
think this should still be included, or? In 4.0.0 it contains
ooxml-schemas-1.4.jar/ooxml-schemas-1.4-sources.jar and checksums.
Thanks... Dominik.
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 12:47 AM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.1 (RC1).
>
> The most notable changes in this release are:
>
> - dependency updates to XMLBeans 3.0.2 / Bouncycastle 1.60
> - XSSF: import chart on drawing
> - XDDF: Define XDDF user model for text body, its paragraphs and text runs
> - OPC: fixes on the newly introduced commons compress usage
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/4.0.1-RC1/
>
> All tests pass. ASC files verify and SHA* are correct.
> There's no clutter in the src/bin packages.
>
> There's a new OOXMLLite mechanism, please also check poi-ooxml-schemas.
>
> Please vote to release the artifacts.
> The vote keeps open until we have have feedback from TIKA and a consent on
> the govdocs results.
>
> Planned release announcement date is 2018-11-26.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE][CANCEL] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
thanks for fixing FileMagic, I just noticed the same bug and planned to fix
it as well.
I just committed one small change so we do not include jars from the new
directory ooxml-testlib in the source-distribution similar to all the other
lib-directories.
Dominik.
On Sun, Nov 25, 2018 at 10:04 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
wrote:
> Not sure if this is necessary, but I formally cancel now RC1 and remove
> its sources ... giving way for RC2.
>
> As #60316 is fixed now - I'll check a few of the common crawl results for
> low hanging fruits and fix them.
>
> After that I'll roll a RC2 soon - if you have anything to put into 4.0.1
> please tell me now.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
[VOTE][CANCEL] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Not sure if this is necessary, but I formally cancel now RC1 and remove its sources ... giving way for RC2.
As #60316 is fixed now - I'll check a few of the common crawl results for low hanging fruits and fix them.
After that I'll roll a RC2 soon - if you have anything to put into 4.0.1 please tell me now.
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
I could speed it up somewhat, results are available, all seems well on this
regression front, see
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reports/index400RC1to401RC1.html
for comparison to 4.0.0 and
http://people.apache.org/~centic/poi_regression/reportsAll/index400RC1to401RC1.html
for all failures.
Only 2 errors are shown compared to 4.0 and both are non-issues as far as I
see, at least I cannot reproduce the problem when running the file manually
so seems to be some issue in the test-driver.
OOMs are likely huge files, also there is a chance of one huge file
affecting other files processed at the same time and the rate is very low
(187 OOM-failures for 1476184 files).
Dominik.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 10:16 PM Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>
wrote:
> Hi,
>
> somehow the run is taking a long time this time around, estimate finish is
> Nov. 26 in the afternoon at the moment.
>
> Until now my runs was quite limited in amount of memory I could use, but I
> can now run it with more memory now as I can run on newer hardware, so
> hopefully the number of OOMs will decrease somewhat and the remaining ones
> are really huge documents which contains excessively large amounts of data.
> We'll see. I can easily adjust the reports and provide a separate set of
> documents which trigger an OOM after the run finishes.
>
> Probably more memory means that some huge documents are now processed
> instead of aborted, so that might even explain the longer runtime that I
> see.
>
> Dominik.
>
> On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:25 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
>> Maybe its obvious, but before I roll another RC I'm waiting for Dominiks
>> common crawl results - as we have the opportunity to add another stability
>> fix.
>>
>> Btw. what makes me "sad", ... is to see those OOMs.
>> Can't we simply exclude them ... in the statistics? ;)
>>
>> But to be serious again - is there a way to identify the source of them
>> in the mass test?
>>
>> My assumptions is, that the OOMs are a result of successive files and not
>> the file failing with the OOM.
>>
>> Andi
>>
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Dominik Stadler <do...@gmx.at>.
Hi,
somehow the run is taking a long time this time around, estimate finish is
Nov. 26 in the afternoon at the moment.
Until now my runs was quite limited in amount of memory I could use, but I
can now run it with more memory now as I can run on newer hardware, so
hopefully the number of OOMs will decrease somewhat and the remaining ones
are really huge documents which contains excessively large amounts of data.
We'll see. I can easily adjust the reports and provide a separate set of
documents which trigger an OOM after the run finishes.
Probably more memory means that some huge documents are now processed
instead of aborted, so that might even explain the longer runtime that I
see.
Dominik.
On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 6:25 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
> Maybe its obvious, but before I roll another RC I'm waiting for Dominiks
> common crawl results - as we have the opportunity to add another stability
> fix.
>
> Btw. what makes me "sad", ... is to see those OOMs.
> Can't we simply exclude them ... in the statistics? ;)
>
> But to be serious again - is there a way to identify the source of them in
> the mass test?
>
> My assumptions is, that the OOMs are a result of successive files and not
> the file failing with the OOM.
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Maybe its obvious, but before I roll another RC I'm waiting for Dominiks common crawl results - as we have the opportunity to add another stability fix.
Btw. what makes me "sad", ... is to see those OOMs.
Can't we simply exclude them ... in the statistics? ;)
But to be serious again - is there a way to identify the source of them in the mass test?
My assumptions is, that the OOMs are a result of successive files and not the file failing with the OOM.
Andi
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Yegor Kozlov <ye...@dinom.ru>.
Bugs
59773,59834,62690,62692,62699,62733,62735,62740,62768,62796,62800,62805,62807
and 62811 were fixed after 4.0 release, but not reflected in the 4.0.1
change log.
See
https://bz.apache.org/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?bug_status=RESOLVED&chfield=resolution&chfieldfrom=2018-09-07&chfieldto=Now&order=bug_id&product=POI&query_format=advanced&resolution=FIXED
With Tim's -1 it makes sense to update the change log before we rebuild the
artifacts.
Yegor
вт, 20 нояб. 2018 г., 2:47 Andreas Beeker kiwiwings@apache.org:
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.1 (RC1).
>
> The most notable changes in this release are:
>
> - dependency updates to XMLBeans 3.0.2 / Bouncycastle 1.60
> - XSSF: import chart on drawing
> - XDDF: Define XDDF user model for text body, its paragraphs and text runs
> - OPC: fixes on the newly introduced commons compress usage
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/4.0.1-RC1/
>
> All tests pass. ASC files verify and SHA* are correct.
> There's no clutter in the src/bin packages.
>
> There's a new OOXMLLite mechanism, please also check poi-ooxml-schemas.
>
> Please vote to release the artifacts.
> The vote keeps open until we have have feedback from TIKA and a consent on
> the govdocs results.
>
> Planned release announcement date is 2018-11-26.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
>which extra ".jar"???
The first one, clearly. :D Thank you!
On Tue, Nov 20, 2018 at 5:01 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi Tim,
>
> which extra ".jar"??? :)
>
> ... just kidding, I've fixed it and thank you!
>
> I was already wondering, that the release process was too smooth.
> Only my local version of the commons-openpgp needed to be used. [1]
>
> Andi
>
> [1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-508
>
>
> On 20.11.18 22:33, Tim Allison wrote:
> > Andi,
> > Thank you! I've built this locally and integrated it into Tika, and
> > I've kicked off the regression tests. The one small glitch I noticed
> > so far is that poi-ooxml-schemas jar has an extra ".jar" in it:
> > build/dist/maven/poi-ooxml-schemas/poi-ooxml-schemas-4.0.1.jar.jar
> > I'll let you all know when I have results.
> >
> > Best,
> >
> > Tim
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org>.
Hi Tim,
which extra ".jar"??? :)
... just kidding, I've fixed it and thank you!
I was already wondering, that the release process was too smooth.
Only my local version of the commons-openpgp needed to be used. [1]
Andi
[1] https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/SANDBOX-508
On 20.11.18 22:33, Tim Allison wrote:
> Andi,
> Thank you! I've built this locally and integrated it into Tika, and
> I've kicked off the regression tests. The one small glitch I noticed
> so far is that poi-ooxml-schemas jar has an extra ".jar" in it:
> build/dist/maven/poi-ooxml-schemas/poi-ooxml-schemas-4.0.1.jar.jar
> I'll let you all know when I have results.
>
> Best,
>
> Tim
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] Apache POI 4.0.1 release (RC1)
Posted by Tim Allison <ta...@apache.org>.
Andi,
Thank you! I've built this locally and integrated it into Tika, and
I've kicked off the regression tests. The one small glitch I noticed
so far is that poi-ooxml-schemas jar has an extra ".jar" in it:
build/dist/maven/poi-ooxml-schemas/poi-ooxml-schemas-4.0.1.jar.jar
I'll let you all know when I have results.
Best,
Tim
On Mon, Nov 19, 2018 at 6:47 PM Andreas Beeker <ki...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> I've prepared artifacts for the release of Apache POI 4.0.1 (RC1).
>
> The most notable changes in this release are:
>
> - dependency updates to XMLBeans 3.0.2 / Bouncycastle 1.60
> - XSSF: import chart on drawing
> - XDDF: Define XDDF user model for text body, its paragraphs and text runs
> - OPC: fixes on the newly introduced commons compress usage
>
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/poi/4.0.1-RC1/
>
> All tests pass. ASC files verify and SHA* are correct.
> There's no clutter in the src/bin packages.
>
> There's a new OOXMLLite mechanism, please also check poi-ooxml-schemas.
>
> Please vote to release the artifacts.
> The vote keeps open until we have have feedback from TIKA and a consent on the govdocs results.
>
> Planned release announcement date is 2018-11-26.
>
> Here is my +1
>
> Andi
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@poi.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@poi.apache.org