You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to commits@cassandra.apache.org by "Jonathan Ellis (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2011/01/18 22:37:43 UTC
[jira] Commented: (CASSANDRA-2004) dynamic snitch doesn't collect
local latencies
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2004?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=12983392#action_12983392 ]
Jonathan Ellis commented on CASSANDRA-2004:
-------------------------------------------
going through MS would negatively affect performance, so IMO the "right" solution is to add latency info to the 0.6 code path, then (in another ticket) look at re-optimizing 0.7 the same way. (0.7 lost this during one of the read repair refactors.)
> dynamic snitch doesn't collect local latencies
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: CASSANDRA-2004
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CASSANDRA-2004
> Project: Cassandra
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Affects Versions: 0.6.9
> Reporter: Brandon Williams
> Assignee: Brandon Williams
> Fix For: 0.6.10
>
>
> The dynamic snitch doesn't collect local latencies, which means that if a coordinator has a local replica it will end up preferring whatever the subsnitch returns. In 0.7 we already collect local latencies by going through MessagingService, so we should do the same in 0.6.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.