You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@sqoop.apache.org by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com> on 2014/02/04 21:54:08 UTC
Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
release an update.
One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
Oraoop.
Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
Thanks
Venkat
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
BTW, I had a brief chatwith Jarcec about 1.4.5 release earlier before
sending out the email and waiting for Oraoop was his thought! So, we have
near unanimous consent for this.
Thanks
Venkat
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks all for your replies. It would be great to get Oraoop into the
> next release. Hopefully it gets through the donation process without any
> issues.
>
> We can wait and revisit this question if there are any new developments on
> the Oraoop front.
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 on waiting for the OraOop donation before cutting the next release
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Same. +1 on both.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
>> >> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +1 on new release.
>> >>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Hari
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Venkat,
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us
>> to ship
>> >>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
>> >>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Arvind Prabhakar
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for
>> 1.4.5 and
>> >>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
>> >>> release an update.
>> >>>
>> >>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the
>> donation of
>> >>> Oraoop.
>> >>>
>> >>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or
>> wait
>> >>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base
>> is not
>> >>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> Venkat
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>> entity to
>> >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> confidential,
>> >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>> reader
>> >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that
>> >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
BTW, I had a brief chatwith Jarcec about 1.4.5 release earlier before
sending out the email and waiting for Oraoop was his thought! So, we have
near unanimous consent for this.
Thanks
Venkat
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 6:10 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> Thanks all for your replies. It would be great to get Oraoop into the
> next release. Hopefully it gets through the donation process without any
> issues.
>
> We can wait and revisit this question if there are any new developments on
> the Oraoop front.
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> +1 on waiting for the OraOop donation before cutting the next release
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> >
>> > +1
>> >
>> >
>> >
>> >> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Same. +1 on both.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
>> >> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>> >>
>> >>> +1 on new release.
>> >>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks,
>> >>> Hari
>> >>>
>> >>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> Hi Venkat,
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us
>> to ship
>> >>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
>> >>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>> >>>
>> >>> Regards,
>> >>> Arvind Prabhakar
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>> >>>
>> >>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for
>> 1.4.5 and
>> >>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
>> >>> release an update.
>> >>>
>> >>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the
>> donation of
>> >>> Oraoop.
>> >>>
>> >>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or
>> wait
>> >>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base
>> is not
>> >>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>> >>>
>> >>> Thanks
>> >>>
>> >>> Venkat
>> >>>
>> >>> --
>> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
>> entity to
>> >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is
>> confidential,
>> >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
>> reader
>> >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby
>> notified that
>> >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
>> immediately
>> >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>> >>>
>> >>>
>> >>>
>>
>
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks all for your replies. It would be great to get Oraoop into the
next release. Hopefully it gets through the donation process without any
issues.
We can wait and revisit this question if there are any new developments on
the Oraoop front.
Thanks
Venkat
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 on waiting for the OraOop donation before cutting the next release
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Same. +1 on both.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> >> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 on new release.
> >>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hari
> >>>
> >>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Venkat,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to
> ship
> >>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
> >>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Arvind Prabhakar
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for
> 1.4.5 and
> >>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> >>> release an update.
> >>>
> >>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation
> of
> >>> Oraoop.
> >>>
> >>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or
> wait
> >>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is
> not
> >>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Venkat
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to
> >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Venkat Ranganathan <vr...@hortonworks.com>.
Thanks all for your replies. It would be great to get Oraoop into the
next release. Hopefully it gets through the donation process without any
issues.
We can wait and revisit this question if there are any new developments on
the Oraoop front.
Thanks
Venkat
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 5:58 PM, Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1 on waiting for the OraOop donation before cutting the next release
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > +1
> >
> >
> >
> >> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
> >>
> >> Same. +1 on both.
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> >> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> >>
> >>> +1 on new release.
> >>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Hari
> >>>
> >>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> >>>
> >>> Hi Venkat,
> >>>
> >>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to
> ship
> >>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
> >>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
> >>>
> >>> Regards,
> >>> Arvind Prabhakar
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> >>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for
> 1.4.5 and
> >>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> >>> release an update.
> >>>
> >>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation
> of
> >>> Oraoop.
> >>>
> >>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or
> wait
> >>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is
> not
> >>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
> >>>
> >>> Thanks
> >>>
> >>> Venkat
> >>>
> >>> --
> >>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> >>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or
> entity to
> >>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> >>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the
> reader
> >>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified
> that
> >>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> >>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> >>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender
> immediately
> >>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>>
>
--
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
and delete it from your system. Thank You.
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org>.
+1 on waiting for the OraOop donation before cutting the next release
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
>> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Same. +1 on both.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on new release.
>>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Venkat,
>>>
>>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
>>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
>>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Arvind Prabhakar
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
>>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
>>> release an update.
>>>
>>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
>>> Oraoop.
>>>
>>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
>>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
>>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Venkat
>>>
>>> --
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Kathleen Ting <ka...@apache.org>.
+1 on waiting for the OraOop donation before cutting the next release
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 3:18 PM, Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> +1
>
>
>
>> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>>
>> Same. +1 on both.
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
>> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>>
>>> +1 on new release.
>>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>>>
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Hari
>>>
>>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>>
>>> Hi Venkat,
>>>
>>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
>>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
>>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Arvind Prabhakar
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
>>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
>>> release an update.
>>>
>>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
>>> Oraoop.
>>>
>>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
>>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
>>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>>>
>>> Thanks
>>>
>>> Venkat
>>>
>>> --
>>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>>
>>>
>>>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> Same. +1 on both.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 on new release.
>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Venkat,
>>
>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arvind Prabhakar
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
>> release an update.
>>
>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
>> Oraoop.
>>
>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Venkat
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>>
>>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Ramkumar G <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
> On 6 Feb 2014, at 9:37 am, Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com> wrote:
>
> Same. +1 on both.
>
>
> On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
> <hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
>
>> +1 on new release.
>> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Hari
>>
>> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>>
>> Hi Venkat,
>>
>> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
>> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
>> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Arvind Prabhakar
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
>> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>>
>> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
>> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
>> release an update.
>>
>> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
>> Oraoop.
>>
>> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
>> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
>> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>>
>> Thanks
>>
>> Venkat
>>
>> --
>> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
>> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
>> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
>> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
>> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
>> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
>> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
>> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
>> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>>
>>
>>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Same. +1 on both.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
<hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> +1 on new release.
> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> release an update.
>
> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
> Oraoop.
>
> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
>
>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Abraham Elmahrek <ab...@cloudera.com>.
Same. +1 on both.
On Wed, Feb 5, 2014 at 1:51 PM, Hari Shreedharan
<hs...@cloudera.com>wrote:
> +1 on new release.
> +1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
>
>
> Thanks,
> Hari
>
> On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
>
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
>
> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> release an update.
>
> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
> Oraoop.
>
> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
>
>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
+1 on new release.
+1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
Thanks,
Hari
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com (mailto:vranganathan@hortonworks.com)> wrote:
>
> > We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
> > we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> > release an update.
> >
> > One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
> > Oraoop.
> >
> > Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
> > for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
> > known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Venkat
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
>
>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Hari Shreedharan <hs...@cloudera.com>.
+1 on new release.
+1 on waiting for OraOop to be committed.
Thanks,
Hari
On Wednesday, February 5, 2014 at 1:04 PM, Arvind Prabhakar wrote:
> Hi Venkat,
>
> Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
> the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
> connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
>
> Regards,
> Arvind Prabhakar
>
>
> On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
> vranganathan@hortonworks.com (mailto:vranganathan@hortonworks.com)> wrote:
>
> > We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
> > we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> > release an update.
> >
> > One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
> > Oraoop.
> >
> > Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
> > for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
> > known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Venkat
> >
> > --
> > CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> > NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> > which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> > privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> > of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> > any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> > forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> > received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> > and delete it from your system. Thank You.
> >
>
>
>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Venkat,
Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> release an update.
>
> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
> Oraoop.
>
> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>
Re: Time for Sqoop 1.4.5?
Posted by Arvind Prabhakar <ar...@apache.org>.
Hi Venkat,
Thanks for starting this discussion. I agree that it is time for us to ship
the next maintenance release of Sqoop 1, and if we can include the new
connector in it, that will add significant value for our users.
Regards,
Arvind Prabhakar
On Tue, Feb 4, 2014 at 12:54 PM, Venkat Ranganathan <
vranganathan@hortonworks.com> wrote:
> We have roughly 45 fixes/improvements/feature to Sqoop target for 1.4.5 and
> we may be getting a few more fixes. I think it might be a good time to
> release an update.
>
> One major feature that can potentially come into 1.4.5 is the donation of
> Oraoop.
>
> Just wondering if there is any thought on doing the 1.4.5 release or wait
> for Oraoop donation (timeline for this to come into sqoop code base is not
> known - but there was a vote to accept the donation)
>
> Thanks
>
> Venkat
>
> --
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE
> NOTICE: This message is intended for the use of the individual or entity to
> which it is addressed and may contain information that is confidential,
> privileged and exempt from disclosure under applicable law. If the reader
> of this message is not the intended recipient, you are hereby notified that
> any printing, copying, dissemination, distribution, disclosure or
> forwarding of this communication is strictly prohibited. If you have
> received this communication in error, please contact the sender immediately
> and delete it from your system. Thank You.
>