You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Alexander Kitaev <al...@tmate.org> on 2006/04/04 20:09:01 UTC
Possible bug with remote status when anchor==target.
Hello All,
I noticed that when there is an incoming addition in anchor directory,
anchor is not reported as remotely modified. Is that correct behaviour?
Example ('inner' is incoming addition):
1. anchor == target
C:\test\svn\wc\ignore\dir>svn st -u .
* inner
Status against revision: 3
2. anchor != target
C:\test\svn\wc\ignore>svn st -u dir
* dir\inner
* 2 dir
Status against revision: 3
Should the first command output be:
C:\test\svn\wc\ignore\dir>svn st -u .
* inner
* 2 .
Status against revision: 3
Alexander Kitaev,
TMate Software,
http://tmate.org/
http://jetbrains.com/tmate/
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
RE: Possible bug with remote status when anchor==target.
Posted by Alexander Kitaev <al...@tmate.org>.
Dear All,
I would like to pay your attention to that issue as it looks more serious:
remote prop change is not reported for status anchor directory:
$ svnadmin create ignore
$ svn co file:///home/alex/ignore/ wc
Checked out revision 0.
$ cd wc
$ svn ps name value .
property 'name' set on '.'
$ svn ci -m "prop set"
Sending .
Committed revision 1.
$ svn up -r0
U .
Updated to revision 0.
$ svn st -uv .
0 0 alex .
Incoming prop change is not reported. Also new stat 18 test hides this
problem. Should I submit a bug?
Alexander Kitaev,
TMate Software,
http://tmate.org/
http://jetbrains.com/tmate/
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Alexander Kitaev [mailto:alex@tmate.org]
> Sent: Tuesday, April 04, 2006 22:09
> To: dev@subversion.tigris.org
> Subject: Possible bug with remote status when anchor==target.
>
> Hello All,
>
> I noticed that when there is an incoming addition in anchor
> directory, anchor is not reported as remotely modified. Is
> that correct behaviour?
>
> Example ('inner' is incoming addition):
>
> 1. anchor == target
> C:\test\svn\wc\ignore\dir>svn st -u .
> * inner
> Status against revision: 3
>
> 2. anchor != target
> C:\test\svn\wc\ignore>svn st -u dir
> * dir\inner
> * 2 dir
> Status against revision: 3
>
> Should the first command output be:
>
> C:\test\svn\wc\ignore\dir>svn st -u .
> * inner
> * 2 .
> Status against revision: 3
>
> Alexander Kitaev,
> TMate Software,
> http://tmate.org/
> http://jetbrains.com/tmate/
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org