You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@mina.apache.org by 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <t...@gmail.com> on 2008/04/03 15:48:47 UTC
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way to
merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
Rick McGuire wrote:
> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to have
> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to the Mina
> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate place to
> put this client?
>
> Rick
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <t...@gmail.com>.
That's great. Thanks a lot!
Sangjin Lee wrote:
> Just fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out.
>
> Regards,
> Sangjin
>
> On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:21 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <trustin@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
>
> One tiny issue: 1.0-SNAPSHOT should be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT according to our
> version numbering scheme:
>
> http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html#Downloads-VersionNumberingScheme
>
> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > The move is done...
> > Thanks,
> > Sangjin
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <sjlee0@gmail.com
> <ma...@gmail.com>> wrote:
> >
> >> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to
> happen
> >> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently
> the branches directory is empty).
> >> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the
> package will be
> >> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
> >> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
> >> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
> >> - artifactId: asyncweb-client
> >> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> - name: AsyncHttpClient
> >>
> >> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sangjin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> <trustin@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please go ahead and move it here. :)
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Sangjin
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
> <list@toolazydogs.com <ma...@toolazydogs.com>>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no
> >>> 1.0
> >>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate
> artifactId.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be
> great and
> >>> is the
> >>>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice
> >>> home
> >>>>> here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Alan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> <trustin@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same
> artifactId
> >>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth
> transition
> >>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you
> think
> >>> about
> >>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox?
> I'm fine
> >>> with
> >>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb
> suite
> >>> (i.e.
> >>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new
> home.
> >>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff
> that's
> >>>>>>> built
> >>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different
> version?
> >>> Or
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
> <ma...@toolazydogs.com>>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yep, that's it.
> >>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release
> it under
> >>>>>>>>> 1.0 of
> >>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the
> artifactId
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> the new
> >>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
> >>>>>>>>> written
> >>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it's this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the
> thread... We
> >>>>>>>>>> discussed
> >>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Sangjin
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> >>>>>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com <ma...@toolazydogs.com>>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
> >>>>>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
> >>>>>>>>>>> re-read the
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> related thread?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
> >>>>>>>>>>>> be our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> still
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <trustin@gmail.com <ma...@gmail.com>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> best way
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>> --
> >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>> --
> >>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>
>
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>.
Just fixed it. Thanks for pointing that out.
Regards,
Sangjin
On Wed, Apr 9, 2008 at 1:21 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> One tiny issue: 1.0-SNAPSHOT should be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT according to our
> version numbering scheme:
>
> http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html#Downloads-VersionNumberingScheme
>
> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > The move is done...
> > Thanks,
> > Sangjin
> >
> >
> > On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen
> >> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is
> >>
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currentlythe branches directory is empty).
> >> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will
> be
> >> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
> >> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
> >> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
> >> - artifactId: asyncweb-client
> >> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> >> - name: AsyncHttpClient
> >>
> >> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Sangjin
> >>
> >>
> >> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>
> >>> Please go ahead and move it here. :)
> >>>
> >>> Cheers,
> >>>
> >>> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>> +1
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Sangjin
> >>>>
> >>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
> >
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no
> >>> 1.0
> >>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and
> >>> is the
> >>>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice
> >>> home
> >>>>> here.
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Regards,
> >>>>> Alan
> >>>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> >>> wrote:
> >>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same
> artifactId
> >>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth
> transition
> >>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think
> >>> about
> >>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine
> >>> with
> >>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite
> >>> (i.e.
> >>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
> >>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when
> >>> the
> >>>>>>> new
> >>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
> >>>>>>> built
> >>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
> >>> Or
> >>>>>>>> you
> >>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Alex
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Yep, that's it.
> >>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it
> under
> >>>>>>>>> 1.0 of
> >>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the
> artifactId
> >>>>>>>>> of
> >>>>>>>>> the new
> >>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
> >>>>>>>>> written
> >>>>>>>>> from
> >>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> I think it's this:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>
> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
> >>>>>>>>>> discussed
> >>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>> Sangjin
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> >>>>>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
> >>>>>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
> >>>>>>>>>>> re-read the
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> related thread?
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
> >>>>>>>>>>>> be our
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> still
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> best way
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>> --
> >>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>> --
> >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>> --
> >>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <t...@gmail.com>.
One tiny issue: 1.0-SNAPSHOT should be 1.0.0-SNAPSHOT according to our
version numbering scheme:
http://mina.apache.org/downloads.html#Downloads-VersionNumberingScheme
Sangjin Lee wrote:
> The move is done...
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
>
> On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen
>> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently the branches directory is empty).
>> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be
>> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
>> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
>> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
>> - artifactId: asyncweb-client
>> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
>> - name: AsyncHttpClient
>>
>> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Sangjin
>>
>>
>> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please go ahead and move it here. :)
>>>
>>> Cheers,
>>>
>>> Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>>> +1
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Sangjin
>>>>
>>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no
>>> 1.0
>>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
>>>>>
>>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and
>>> is the
>>>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice
>>> home
>>>>> here.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
>>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
>>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think
>>> about
>>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine
>>> with
>>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite
>>> (i.e.
>>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
>>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when
>>> the
>>>>>>> new
>>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
>>>>>>> built
>>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
>>> Or
>>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Yep, that's it.
>>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
>>>>>>>>> 1.0 of
>>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
>>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>>> the new
>>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
>>>>>>>>> written
>>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> I think it's this:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
>>>>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>> Sangjin
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
>>>>>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
>>>>>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
>>>>>>>>>>> re-read the
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> related thread?
>>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
>>>>>>>>>>>> be our
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0
>>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
>>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>>>>>>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
>>>>>>>>>>>>> best way
>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>> --
>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>> --
>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>
>>>
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>.
The move is done...
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Mon, Apr 7, 2008 at 6:18 PM, Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen
> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently the branches directory is empty).
> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be
> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
> - artifactId: asyncweb-client
> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> - name: AsyncHttpClient
>
> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
>
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
> > Please go ahead and move it here. :)
> >
> > Cheers,
> >
> > Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > > +1
> > > Regards,
> > > Sangjin
> > >
> > > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > >> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no
> > 1.0
> > >> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
> > >>
> > >> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and
> > is the
> > >> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice
> > home
> > >> here.
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Regards,
> > >> Alan
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
> > >>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
> > >>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think
> > about
> > >>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine
> > with
> > >>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite
> > (i.e.
> > >>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> > >>>
> > >>>
> > >>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > >>>
> > >>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
> > >>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when
> > the
> > >>>> new
> > >>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
> > >>>> built
> > >>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Regards,
> > >>>> Alan
> > >>>>
> > >>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > >>>>
> > >>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
> > Or
> > >>>>> you
> > >>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Alex
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
> > >>>>>
> > >>>>> Yep, that's it.
> > >>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
> > >>>>>> 1.0 of
> > >>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
> > >>>>>> of
> > >>>>>> the new
> > >>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
> > >>>>>> written
> > >>>>>> from
> > >>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>> Alan
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>> I think it's this:
> > >>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
> > >>>>>>> discussed
> > >>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>> Sangjin
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> > >>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
> > >>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
> > >>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>> Alan
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
> > >>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
> > >>>>>>>> re-read the
> > >>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>> related thread?
> > >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
> > >>>>>>>>> be our
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> v1.0
> > >>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
> > >>>>>>>>>> think it
> > >>>>>>>>>> still
> > >>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> > >>>>>>>>>> Alan
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> > >>>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
> > >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
> > >>>>>>>>>> best way
> > >>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
> > >>>>>>>>>>> appear
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> have
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> move it
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> place
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
> > >>>>>>>>>>> Hat
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > >>>>>>>>> --
> > >>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>>>>>>>>
> > >>> --
> > >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > >>> --
> > >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > >>> --
> > >>> http://gleamynode.net/
> > >>>
> > >>>
> >
> > --
> > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> >
> >
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Jeff Genender <jg...@apache.org>.
+1! ;-)
Sangjin Lee wrote:
> I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen
> - The svn path under which the code will be moved is
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently
> the branches directory is empty).
> - The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be
> renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
> org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
> - groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
> - artifactId: asyncweb-client
> - version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
> - name: AsyncHttpClient
>
> Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
>
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
>
> On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Please go ahead and move it here. :)
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>> +1
>>> Regards,
>>> Sangjin
>>>
>>> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0
>>>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
>>>>
>>>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is
>> the
>>>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home
>>>> here.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
>>>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
>>>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think
>> about
>>>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine
>> with
>>>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite
>> (i.e.
>>>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
>>>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the
>>>>>> new
>>>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
>>>>>> built
>>>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
>> Or
>>>>>>> you
>>>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alex
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Yep, that's it.
>>>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
>>>>>>>> 1.0 of
>>>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
>>>>>>>> of
>>>>>>>> the new
>>>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
>>>>>>>> written
>>>>>>>> from
>>>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> I think it's this:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
>>>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>> Sangjin
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
>>>>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
>>>>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
>>>>>>>>>> re-read the
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> related thread?
>>>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
>>>>>>>>>>> be our
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> v1.0
>>>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
>>>>>>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>>>>>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
>>>>>>>>>>>> best way
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
>>>>>>>>>>>>> appear
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> move it
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
>>>>>>>>>>>>> Hat
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>> --
>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>> --
>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>> --
>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>> --
>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>
>>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>.
I began looking into this... Just to summarize what's going to happen
- The svn path under which the code will be moved is
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/mina/asyncweb/branches/1.0/client(currently
the branches directory is empty).
- The code will be moved as is from the G sandbox, but the package will be
renamed and refactored from org.apache.ahc.* to
org.apache.asyncweb.client.*.
- groupId: org.apache.asyncweb
- artifactId: asyncweb-client
- version: 1.0-SNAPSHOT
- name: AsyncHttpClient
Please let me know if this is different than what you guys think...
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Sat, Apr 5, 2008 at 1:34 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> Please go ahead and move it here. :)
>
> Cheers,
>
> Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > +1
> > Regards,
> > Sangjin
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0
> >> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
> >>
> >> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is
> the
> >> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home
> >> here.
> >>
> >>
> >> Regards,
> >> Alan
> >>
> >>
> >> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
> >>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
> >>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think
> about
> >>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine
> with
> >>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite
> (i.e.
> >>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>
> >>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
> >>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the
> >>>> new
> >>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
> >>>> built
> >>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> >>>>
> >>>> Regards,
> >>>> Alan
> >>>>
> >>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
> Or
> >>>>> you
> >>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Alex
> >>>>>
> >>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Yep, that's it.
> >>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
> >>>>>> 1.0 of
> >>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
> >>>>>> of
> >>>>>> the new
> >>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
> >>>>>> written
> >>>>>> from
> >>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> I think it's this:
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
> >>>>>>> discussed
> >>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>> Sangjin
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> >>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
> >>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
> >>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
> >>>>>>>> re-read the
> >>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>> related thread?
> >>>>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
> >>>>>>>>> be our
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> v1.0
> >>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
> >>>>>>>>>> think it
> >>>>>>>>>> still
> >>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Regards,
> >>>>>>>>>> Alan
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> >>>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
> >>>>>>>>>> wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
> >>>>>>>>>> best way
> >>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> >>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
> >>>>>>>>>>> appear
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> have
> >>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> move it
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
> >>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
> >>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
> >>>>>>>>>>>> place
> >>>>>>>>>>>> to
> >>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
> >>>>>>>>>>> Hat
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>>>>>>>> --
> >>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>>>>>>>>
> >>> --
> >>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> >>> --
> >>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> >>> --
> >>> http://gleamynode.net/
> >>>
> >>>
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <t...@gmail.com>.
Please go ahead and move it here. :)
Cheers,
Sangjin Lee wrote:
> +1
> Regards,
> Sangjin
>
> On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0
>> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
>>
>> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is the
>> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home
>> here.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
>>> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
>>> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think about
>>> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine with
>>> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite (i.e.
>>> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
>>>
>>>
>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
>>>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the
>>>> new
>>>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
>>>> built
>>>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? Or
>>>>> you
>>>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
>>>>>
>>>>> Alex
>>>>>
>>>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>>>>
>>>>> Yep, that's it.
>>>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
>>>>>> 1.0 of
>>>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
>>>>>> of
>>>>>> the new
>>>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
>>>>>> written
>>>>>> from
>>>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I think it's this:
>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
>>>>>>> discussed
>>>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>> Sangjin
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
>>>>>>> list@toolazydogs.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
>>>>>>>> trustin@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
>>>>>>>> re-read the
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> related thread?
>>>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
>>>>>>>>> be our
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> v1.0
>>>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
>>>>>>>>>> think it
>>>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>>>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
>>>>>>>>>> best way
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
>>>>>>>>>>> appear
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
>>>>>>>>>>>> move it
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
>>>>>>>>>>>> appropriate
>>>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
>>>>>>>>>>> Hat
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>> --
>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>> --
>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>> --
>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>
>>>
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>.
+1
Regards,
Sangjin
On Fri, Apr 4, 2008 at 9:45 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
> I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0
> release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
>
> Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is the
> reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice home
> here.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
> > with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
> > (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think about
> > moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine with
> > releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite (i.e.
> > client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
> >
> >
> > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> > > Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
> > > Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the
> > > new
> > > stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
> > > built
> > > on MINA 2.0 goodness.
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> > >
> > > Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? Or
> > > > you
> > > > want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
> > > >
> > > > Alex
> > > >
> > > > 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
> > > >
> > > > Yep, that's it.
> > > > >
> > > > > The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
> > > > > 1.0 of
> > > > > it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
> > > > > of
> > > > > the new
> > > > > client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
> > > > > written
> > > > > from
> > > > > "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Alan
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > I think it's this:
> > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
> > > > > > discussed
> > > > > > making it a branch of asyncweb.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > Sangjin
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <
> > > > > > list@toolazydogs.com>
> > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Where do I look in the headers?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > Alan
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <
> > > > > > > trustin@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can
> > > > > > > re-read the
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > related thread?
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Thanks,
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > The discussion that took place earlier was that this would
> > > > > > > > be our
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > v1.0
> > > > > > > > > release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I
> > > > > > > > > think it
> > > > > > > > > still
> > > > > > > > > needs to be put to a vote.
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Regards,
> > > > > > > > > Alan
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
> > > > > > > > > <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > > > > > > > wrote:
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the
> > > > > > > > > best way
> > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Rick McGuire wrote:
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox
> > > > > > > > > > appear
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > > > > > settled down, so I think now would be a good time to
> > > > > > > > > > > move it
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > the Mina
> > > > > > > > > > > project if everybody agrees. Where would be the
> > > > > > > > > > > appropriate
> > > > > > > > > > > place
> > > > > > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > > > > > put this client?
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > Rick
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red
> > > > > > > > > > Hat
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > > > > > --
> > > > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > >
> > >
> > --
> > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> >
> >
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
I hold no strong opinions about the artifactId. Since there is no 1.0
release then I don't see a real need to have a separate artifactId.
Moving GAHC to a 1.0 branch instead of a sandbox would be great and is
the reason I chimed in. I really want to kill GAHC and give it a nice
home here.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:43 PM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
<tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
> with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
> (and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think
> about
> moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine
> with
> releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite
> (i.e.
> client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
>
>
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
>> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when
>> the new
>> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
>> built
>> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>>
>>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
>>> Or you
>>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
>>>
>>> Alex
>>>
>>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>>
>>>> Yep, that's it.
>>>>
>>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
>>>> 1.0 of
>>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
>>>> of
>>>> the new
>>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
>>>> written
>>>> from
>>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I think it's this:
>>>>>
>>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
>>>>> discussed
>>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>> Sangjin
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
>>>>> >
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read
>>>>>> the
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> related thread?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be
>>>>>>> our
>>>>>>>> v1.0
>>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it
>>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best
>>>>>>>> way
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
>>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>
>>
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <t...@gmail.com>.
Sounds like a good idea. I'd prefer GAHC to use the same artifactId
with our current trunk stuff as Alex suggested for smooth transition
(and less pollution in our Maven repository :). What do you think about
moving GAHC to /asyncweb/branches/1.0 instead of sandbox? I'm fine with
releasing GAHC with AsyncWeb Client 1.0 and release AsyncWeb suite (i.e.
client + server) with the version number 2 after then.
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
> Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the new
> stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's built
> on MINA 2.0 goodness.
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
>
>> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? Or you
>> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
>>
>> Alex
>>
>> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>>
>>> Yep, that's it.
>>>
>>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under 1.0 of
>>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId of
>>> the new
>>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and written
>>> from
>>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>>>
>>>
>>> Regards,
>>> Alan
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>>
>>> I think it's this:
>>>>
>>>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
>>>> discussed
>>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks,
>>>> Sangjin
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> Regards,
>>>>> Alan
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
>>>>>
>>>>>> related thread?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our
>>>>>>> v1.0
>>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it
>>>>>>> still
>>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>>>>>>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way
>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
>>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>> --
>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>
>
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Exactly, a clear demarcation. It's really G AHC in it's new home.
Also, we're committed that it's a deprecated line and that, when the
new stuff is ready, everyone should be using the new 2.0 stuff that's
built on MINA 2.0 goodness.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 12:53 PM, Alex Karasulu wrote:
> Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version?
> Or you
> want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
>
> Alex
>
> 2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
>
>> Yep, that's it.
>>
>> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under
>> 1.0 of
>> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
>> of the new
>> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and
>> written from
>> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>>
>> I think it's this:
>>>
>>> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>>>
>>> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
>>> discussed
>>> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>> Sangjin
>>>
>>>
>>> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <list@toolazydogs.com
>>> >
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희
>>>> 승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
>>>>
>>>>> related thread?
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks,
>>>>>
>>>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our
>>>>>> v1.0
>>>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it
>>>>>> still
>>>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>>>
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Regards,
>>>>>> Alan
>>>>>>
>>>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희
>>>>>> 승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>>>> wrote:
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way
>>>>>> to
>>>>>>
>>>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> have
>>>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
>>>>>>>> place
>>>>>>>> to
>>>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>>>> --
>>>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>
>>>>>> --
>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>> --
>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Alex Karasulu <ak...@apache.org>.
Why not have the same artifactId and just have different version? Or you
want a clear demarcation so there can be no confusion?
Alex
2008/4/3 Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>:
> Yep, that's it.
>
> The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under 1.0 of
> it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId of the new
> client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0 and written from
> "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
>
> I think it's this:
> >
> > http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
> >
> > Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We discussed
> > making it a branch of asyncweb.
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Sangjin
> >
> >
> > On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> > Where do I look in the headers?
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
> > >
> > > > related thread?
> > > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > >
> > > > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> > > >
> > > > The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our
> > > > > v1.0
> > > > > release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it
> > > > > still
> > > > > needs to be put to a vote.
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > Regards,
> > > > > Alan
> > > > >
> > > > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > > > wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way
> > > > > to
> > > > >
> > > > > > merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Rick McGuire wrote:
> > > > > >
> > > > > > Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > have
> > > > > > > settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > the Mina
> > > > > > > project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
> > > > > > > place
> > > > > > > to
> > > > > > > put this client?
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > > Rick
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > >
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > > > --
> > > > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > > --
> > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > > > --
> > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > --
> > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Yep, that's it.
The idea was for it to get its own branch and we release it under 1.0
of it's own artifactId, which would be different than the artifactId
of the new client that Mike et al are working on. This would be 2.0
and written from "scratch" off of MINA 2.0.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 11:45 AM, Sangjin Lee wrote:
> I think it's this:
> http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
>
> Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We
> discussed
> making it a branch of asyncweb.
>
> Thanks,
> Sangjin
>
>
> On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera
> <li...@toolazydogs.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Where do I look in the headers?
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승
>> (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
>>> related thread?
>>>
>>> Thanks,
>>>
>>> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>>>
>>>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our
>>>> v1.0
>>>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it
>>>> still
>>>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> Regards,
>>>> Alan
>>>>
>>>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희
>>>> 승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way
>>>> to
>>>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>>>
>>>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to
>>>>>> have
>>>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to
>>>>>> the Mina
>>>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
>>>>>> place
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> put this client?
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Rick
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> --
>>>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>>>> --
>>>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>>>> --
>>>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>
>>> --
>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>> --
>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>> --
>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>
>>>
>>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by Sangjin Lee <sj...@gmail.com>.
I think it's this:
http://www.nabble.com/-AsyncWeb--build-broken-w--last-checkin-td15784297.html
Look towards the bottom (the most recent) of the thread... We discussed
making it a branch of asyncweb.
Thanks,
Sangjin
On Thu, Apr 3, 2008 at 11:21 AM, Alan D. Cabrera <li...@toolazydogs.com>
wrote:
> Where do I look in the headers?
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
> > related thread?
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> > Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> >
> > > The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our v1.0
> > > release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it still
> > > needs to be put to a vote.
> > >
> > >
> > > Regards,
> > > Alan
> > >
> > > On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> > > wrote:
> > >
> > > Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way to
> > > > merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
> > > >
> > > > Rick McGuire wrote:
> > > >
> > > > > Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to
> > > > > have
> > > > > settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to
> > > > > the Mina
> > > > > project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate place
> > > > > to
> > > > > put this client?
> > > > >
> > > > > Rick
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > > --
> > > > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > > > --
> > > > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > > > --
> > > > http://gleamynode.net/
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> > --
> > Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> > --
> > what we call human nature is actually human habit
> > --
> > http://gleamynode.net/
> >
> >
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
Where do I look in the headers?
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 9:51 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
<tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
> related thread?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
>> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our
>> v1.0
>> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it still
>> needs to be put to a vote.
>>
>>
>> Regards,
>> Alan
>>
>> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
>> <tr...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way to
>>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>>
>>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to
>>>> have
>>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to
>>>> the Mina
>>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate
>>>> place to
>>>> put this client?
>>>>
>>>> Rick
>>>
>>> --
>>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>>> --
>>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>>> --
>>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>>
>>
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by 이희승 (Trustin Lee) <t...@gmail.com>.
Uh.. did we? Could you tell me the message ID so I can re-read the
related thread?
Thanks,
Alan D. Cabrera wrote:
> The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our v1.0
> release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it still
> needs to be put to a vote.
>
>
> Regards,
> Alan
>
> On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee) <tr...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way to
>> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>>
>> Rick McGuire wrote:
>>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to have
>>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to the Mina
>>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate place to
>>> put this client?
>>>
>>> Rick
>>
>> --
>> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
>> --
>> what we call human nature is actually human habit
>> --
>> http://gleamynode.net/
>>
>
--
Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
--
what we call human nature is actually human habit
--
http://gleamynode.net/
Re: Moving the AHC 1.1.5 client from the Geronimo sandbox.
Posted by "Alan D. Cabrera" <li...@toolazydogs.com>.
The discussion that took place earlier was that this would be our v1.0
release of Async client in the Mina project, IIRC. I think it still
needs to be put to a vote.
Regards,
Alan
On Apr 3, 2008, at 6:48 AM, "이희승 (Trustin Lee)
<tr...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Let's move it to the sandbox first and then find out the best way to
> merge it to upstream (AsyncWeb). WDYT?
>
> Rick McGuire wrote:
>> Changes to the 1.1.5 AHC client in the Geronimo sandbox appear to
>> have
>> settled down, so I think now would be a good time to move it to the
>> Mina
>> project if everybody agrees. Where would be the appropriate place to
>> put this client?
>>
>> Rick
>
> --
> Trustin Lee - Principal Software Engineer, JBoss, Red Hat
> --
> what we call human nature is actually human habit
> --
> http://gleamynode.net/
>