You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@uima.apache.org by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> on 2008/06/10 01:12:52 UTC
UIMA-AS - should Derby be included?
The current build includes Derby in
...apache-uima-as\apache-activemq-4.1.1\lib\optional. Is this correct?
I thought it wasn't needed in the way UIMA-AS uses ActiveMQ.
-Marshall
Re: UIMA-AS - should Derby be included?
Posted by Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com>.
Eddie Epstein wrote:
> Derby is not needed when using the AMQ configuration file distributed with
> UIMA AS.
>
> If the AMQ configuration is changed to use journaling, Derby is required,
> but as of now there is no advantage that I know of for enabling journaling
> with UIMA AS. This is because UIMA AS supports timeout and retry for remote
> calls.
>
> What changes if Derby is left out?
>
Well, maybe something breaks (a risk). The binary build is smaller (2
MB Jar). Derby is already under Apache 2.0 license, so our license file
doesn't change, I think.
-Marshall
> Eddie
>
> On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
>
>
>> The current build includes Derby in
>> ...apache-uima-as\apache-activemq-4.1.1\lib\optional. Is this correct? I
>> thought it wasn't needed in the way UIMA-AS uses ActiveMQ.
>>
>> -Marshall
>>
>>
>
>
Re: UIMA-AS - should Derby be included?
Posted by Eddie Epstein <ea...@gmail.com>.
Derby is not needed when using the AMQ configuration file distributed with
UIMA AS.
If the AMQ configuration is changed to use journaling, Derby is required,
but as of now there is no advantage that I know of for enabling journaling
with UIMA AS. This is because UIMA AS supports timeout and retry for remote
calls.
What changes if Derby is left out?
Eddie
On Mon, Jun 9, 2008 at 7:12 PM, Marshall Schor <ms...@schor.com> wrote:
> The current build includes Derby in
> ...apache-uima-as\apache-activemq-4.1.1\lib\optional. Is this correct? I
> thought it wasn't needed in the way UIMA-AS uses ActiveMQ.
>
> -Marshall
>