You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by "William A. Rowe Jr." <wr...@rowe-clan.net> on 2012/01/28 20:16:33 UTC
Re: [Discuss] httpd 2.2.22 release
On 1/28/2012 12:36 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>
> When there's 1.4.2 with rough edges resolved, that's another matter.
Depending on which rough edges, remember that autoconf is
regenerated, ergo the legacy one. Not sure which rough
edges you are most concerned about.
> I need to revisit the theory of 2.2/1.3.12 and 2.4/1.4.1 collision. I
> guess that implies certain non-default layouts?
--with-apr-util=builtin of 1.3 for httpd 2.2 - and yet installing
to the /usr or /usr/local path, overwriting an already-installed 1.4.
Nonstandard; httpd 2.2 and 2.4 in two different trees.
Re: [Discuss] httpd 2.2.22 release
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 2:16 PM, William A. Rowe Jr.
<wr...@rowe-clan.net> wrote:
> On 1/28/2012 12:36 PM, Jeff Trawick wrote:
>>
>> When there's 1.4.2 with rough edges resolved, that's another matter.
>
> Depending on which rough edges, remember that autoconf is
> regenerated, ergo the legacy one. Not sure which rough
> edges you are most concerned about.
That's all I was thinking of. So no concern here. Thanks!
>> I need to revisit the theory of 2.2/1.3.12 and 2.4/1.4.1 collision. I
>> guess that implies certain non-default layouts?
>
> --with-apr-util=builtin of 1.3 for httpd 2.2 - and yet installing
> to the /usr or /usr/local path, overwriting an already-installed 1.4.
>
> Nonstandard; httpd 2.2 and 2.4 in two different trees.
--
Born in Roswell... married an alien...