You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to server-dev@james.apache.org by Norman Maurer <nm...@byteaction.de> on 2006/10/19 09:28:03 UTC
[VOTE] JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)
Hi all,
i think we are now ready to VOTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
build,sign and upload the release.. You can grab it from:
http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/
Plz review
The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
release ? Or should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
See JAMES-662.
In the build its not fixed and included..
bye
Norman
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)
Posted by Stefano Bagnara <ap...@bago.org>.
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i think we are now ready to VOTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
> build,sign and upload the release.. You can grab it from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/
>
> Plz review
+1 to release 2.3.0RC5 as final.
Stefano Bagnara
The only difference between RC5 and the prepared artifact is the version
number.
> The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
> release ? Or should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
> See JAMES-662.
> In the build its not fixed and included..
Imho we should release 2.3.0 as is. This "minor" fix and maybe more
belongs to 2.3.1 or to 2.4.0 (and I guess this decision belongs to some
day in november).
Stefano
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)
Posted by Danny Angus <da...@gmail.com>.
> > i think we are now ready to VOTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
> > build,sign and upload the release.. You can grab it from:
+1
> > The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
> > release ? Or should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
> > See JAMES-662.
> > In the build its not fixed and included..
> >
> Let's leave it out for a future release.
+1
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] JAMES 2.3.0 final :-)
Posted by Vincenzo Gianferrari Pini <vi...@praxis.it>.
+1 for releasing 2.3.0rc5 as 2.3.0 final.
Vincenzo
Norman Maurer wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> i think we are now ready to VOTE for the 2.3.0 final release of james. I
> build,sign and upload the release.. You can grab it from:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~norman/james/downloads/
>
> Plz review
>
> The other question is should we fix the sendmail wrapper in the 2.3.0
> release ? Or should we remove the wrapper and only keep it in trunk ?
> See JAMES-662.
> In the build its not fixed and included..
>
Let's leave it out for a future release.
Vincenzo
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: server-dev-unsubscribe@james.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: server-dev-help@james.apache.org