You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@openjpa.apache.org by "Tim Holloway (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2008/06/12 18:44:45 UTC
[jira] Created: (OPENJPA-636) Clarify impedance mismatch between
in-memory objects and their persistent counterparts
Clarify impedance mismatch between in-memory objects and their persistent counterparts
--------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Key: OPENJPA-636
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/OPENJPA-636
Project: OpenJPA
Issue Type: Improvement
Components: docs
Environment: All
Reporter: Tim Holloway
Priority: Minor
Date objects persisted out and read back may not have exactly identical values due to differences in the implicit precision of Java date object versus the actual database. The results can be quite frustrating to developers who aren't aware of that fact.
A discussion of this problem can be found here:
http://saloon.javaranch.com/cgi-bin/ubb/ultimatebb.cgi?ubb=get_topic&f=78&t=004041&p=1
I think it deserves to be a topic in the user's guide, along with mention of similar imprecise datatypes.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.