You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.

Posted to dev@wicket.apache.org by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> on 2007/03/09 21:15:07 UTC

browser window detection with SLCSS

Unless clients track window specific state and use our browser window
detection thing for that, I think we can let the
SecondLevelCacheSessionStore implementation turn off this detection by
default, agreed?

Eelco

Re: browser window detection with SLCSS

Posted by Matej Knopp <ma...@knopp.sk>.

+1(00000000000000)

-Matej

Eelco Hillenius wrote:
> Unless clients track window specific state and use our browser window
> detection thing for that, I think we can let the
> SecondLevelCacheSessionStore implementation turn off this detection by
> default, agreed?
> 
> Eelco
>

Re: browser window detection with SLCSS

Posted by Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com>.

All that I remember is that some people wanted to remove the whole
detection altogether rather than just turning it off by default. It
may all have been mis-communication though. Anyway, everyone is happy
now! :)

Eelco

On 3/9/07, Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> as far as i can remember...
> i had that in place.. some particular person, which name i will not mention,
> removed that ;)
>
> johan
>
>
> On 3/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Unless clients track window specific state and use our browser window
> > detection thing for that, I think we can let the
> > SecondLevelCacheSessionStore implementation turn off this detection by
> > default, agreed?
> >
> > Eelco
> >
>

Re: browser window detection with SLCSS

Posted by Johan Compagner <jc...@gmail.com>.

as far as i can remember...
i had that in place.. some particular person, which name i will not mention,
removed that ;)

johan


On 3/9/07, Eelco Hillenius <ee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Unless clients track window specific state and use our browser window
> detection thing for that, I think we can let the
> SecondLevelCacheSessionStore implementation turn off this detection by
> default, agreed?
>
> Eelco
>