You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@gossip.apache.org by "Rishabh Patel (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2016/10/17 19:58:58 UTC
[jira] [Created] (GOSSIP-30) Use getDeadMembers instead of
getDeadList
Rishabh Patel created GOSSIP-30:
-----------------------------------
Summary: Use getDeadMembers instead of getDeadList
Key: GOSSIP-30
URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/GOSSIP-30
Project: Gossip
Issue Type: Improvement
Reporter: Rishabh Patel
Assignee: Rishabh Patel
The getDeadList method is a duplicate of getDeadMembers
{code:title=GossipManager.java}
public List<LocalGossipMember> getDeadMembers() {
List<LocalGossipMember> down = new ArrayList<>();
for (Entry<LocalGossipMember, GossipState> entry : members.entrySet()) {
if (GossipState.DOWN.equals(entry.getValue())) {
down.add(entry.getKey());
}
}
return Collections.unmodifiableList(down);
}
public List<LocalGossipMember> getDeadList() {
List<LocalGossipMember> up = new ArrayList<>();
for (Entry<LocalGossipMember, GossipState> entry : members.entrySet()) {
if (GossipState.DOWN.equals(entry.getValue())) {
up.add(entry.getKey());
}
}
return Collections.unmodifiableList(up);
}
{code}
I recommend removing getDeadList, as now we can use the pair of similarly named methods getLiveMembers and getDeadMembers
--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)