You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@tajo.apache.org by "Hyunsik Choi (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2014/10/05 04:14:33 UTC

[jira] [Updated] (TAJO-1093) DateTimeFormat.to_char() is slower than SimpleDateFormat.format()

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1093?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Hyunsik Choi updated TAJO-1093:
-------------------------------
    Component/s: data type

> DateTimeFormat.to_char() is slower than SimpleDateFormat.format()
> -----------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: TAJO-1093
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TAJO-1093
>             Project: Tajo
>          Issue Type: Improvement
>          Components: data type
>            Reporter: Hyoungjun Kim
>            Assignee: Jihun Kang
>            Priority: Minor
>              Labels: datetime
>             Fix For: 0.9.0
>
>
> I tested DateTimeFormat class with the below code.
> {code}
> TimeMeta tm = new TimeMeta();
> DateTimeUtil.toJulianTimeMeta(DateTimeUtil.javaTimeToJulianTime(System.currentTimeMillis()), tm);
> int iteration = 1000000;
> long startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> for (int i = 0; i < iteration; i++) {
>   DateTimeFormat.to_char(tm, "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS");
> }
> long endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> System.out.println("DateTimeFormat.to_char: " + (endTime - startTime) + " ms");
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> SimpleDateFormat df = new SimpleDateFormat("yyyy-MM-dd HH:mm:ss");
> Date date = new Date();
> startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> for (int i = 0; i < iteration; i++) {
>   df.format(date);
> }
> endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> System.out.println("SimpleDateFormat.format: " + (endTime - startTime) + " ms");
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> for (int i = 0; i < iteration; i++) {
>   DateTimeFormat.parseDateTime("2014-01-01 12:11:11", "YYYY-MM-DD HH24:MI:SS");
> }
> endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> System.out.println("DateTimeFormat.parseDateTime: " + (endTime - startTime) + " ms");
> ///////////////////////////////////////////////////////////
> startTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> for (int i = 0; i < iteration; i++) {
>   df.parse("2014-01-01 12:11:11");
> }
> endTime = System.currentTimeMillis();
> System.out.println("SimpleDateFormat.parse: " + (endTime - startTime) + " ms");
> {code}
> The following is the test result. DateTimeFormat.to_char is 20 times slower than SimpleDateFormat.format.
> {noformat}
> DateTimeFormat.to_char: 6993 ms
> SimpleDateFormat.format: 373 ms
> DateTimeFormat.parseDateTime: 798 ms
> SimpleDateFormat.parse: 1400 ms
> {noformat}



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.4#6332)