You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to issues@activemq.apache.org by "ASF GitHub Bot (Jira)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2022/09/21 11:49:00 UTC

[jira] [Work logged] (ARTEMIS-4007) properties config - complete feedback loop with server status attribute

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4007?focusedWorklogId=810696&page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:worklog-tabpanel#worklog-810696 ]

ASF GitHub Bot logged work on ARTEMIS-4007:
-------------------------------------------

                Author: ASF GitHub Bot
            Created on: 21/Sep/22 11:48
            Start Date: 21/Sep/22 11:48
    Worklog Time Spent: 10m 
      Work Description: gtully opened a new pull request, #4228:
URL: https://github.com/apache/activemq-artemis/pull/4228

   … version or error state and reflect modifications via refresh




Issue Time Tracking
-------------------

            Worklog Id:     (was: 810696)
    Remaining Estimate: 0h
            Time Spent: 10m

> properties config - complete feedback loop with server status attribute
> -----------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: ARTEMIS-4007
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/ARTEMIS-4007
>             Project: ActiveMQ Artemis
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Configuration
>    Affects Versions: 2.25.0
>            Reporter: Gary Tully
>            Assignee: Gary Tully
>            Priority: Major
>          Time Spent: 10m
>  Remaining Estimate: 0h
>
> Following on from ARTEMIS-4001 - in kubernetties - where properties can be mounted as  projections of config maps, there can be a large delay between update and the refresh being visible to the broker.
> Adding a status attribute to the server control that is driven by configuration, will allow properties files to embed version or status information and see those reflected via admin or jolokia queries.
> This then provides a nice feedback loop. I am calling it status like MetaData status, but also leaving it free form such that any sensible json can be embedded once there is coordination.
> Initially the value will just be set like any property.
> Eventually it could provide an entry point for the parser to inform of property key=value mismatch or errors on update in some "error" section. 



--
This message was sent by Atlassian Jira
(v8.20.10#820010)