You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to mod_python-dev@quetz.apache.org by Jim Gallacher <ji...@jgassociates.ca> on 2006/06/29 13:29:39 UTC

mod_python 3.2.9-rc3 test results

Here are the test results for 3.2.9 release candidate 3.

+1 FreeBSD 6.1 / Apache 2.2 / Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.0.55, python 2.3.5
Linux (Fedora Core 4) on Intel x86, Apache 2.0.58, Python 2.4.3
+1 Linux Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55, Python 2.4.1
+1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.0, Python 2.4.1
+1 Linux Zenwalk 2.6, Apache 2.2.2, Python 2.4.3
+1 Mac OS X (PPC/10.4.6), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
standard version)
+1 Mac OS X (PPC/10.4.6), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
standard version)
+1 MacOSX 10.4.6 Intel, Apache-2.0.55, apache-2.0.55
+1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58, ActivePython 2.4.3

Unless there are any objections I'll tag and roll the 3.2.9 tarball
today for a final round of testing. The final tarball will be identical
to 3.2.9-rc3, but with the version strings bumped to 3.2.9.

We should be able to make a public release by the middle of next week.

Jim

Re: mod_python 3.2.9-rc3 test results

Posted by Jorey Bump <li...@joreybump.com>.
Jim Gallacher wrote:
> Graham Dumpleton wrote:
>> On 29/06/2006, at 9:29 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
>>

>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55, Python 2.4.1
>>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.0, Python 2.4.1
>>> +1 Linux Zenwalk 2.6, Apache 2.2.2, Python 2.4.3

These 3 were all prefork.

>> In respect of testing in the future, can everyone make a note though which
>> MPM, ie., worker or prefork , they are using when testing on UNIX like
>> system. I would feel much more comfortable if I know there is a mix of
>> prefork and worker across the range of UNIX like systems.
> 
> Good point. In the future when I send an email to the list requesting a
> round of testing I'll include a reminder.
> 
> Jim

Re: mod_python 3.2.9-rc3 test results

Posted by Jim Gallacher <jp...@jgassociates.ca>.
Graham Dumpleton wrote:
> 
> On 29/06/2006, at 9:29 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:
> 
>> Here are the test results for 3.2.9 release candidate 3.
>>
>> +1 FreeBSD 6.1 / Apache 2.2 / Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.0.55, python 2.3.5
>> Linux (Fedora Core 4) on Intel x86, Apache 2.0.58, Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55, Python 2.4.1
>> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.0, Python 2.4.1
>> +1 Linux Zenwalk 2.6, Apache 2.2.2, Python 2.4.3
>> +1 Mac OS X (PPC/10.4.6), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>> standard version)
>> +1 Mac OS X (PPC/10.4.6), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
>> standard version)
>> +1 MacOSX 10.4.6 Intel, Apache-2.0.55, apache-2.0.55
>> +1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58, ActivePython 2.4.3
>>
>> Unless there are any objections I'll tag and roll the 3.2.9 tarball
>> today for a final round of testing. The final tarball will be identical
>> to 3.2.9-rc3, but with the version strings bumped to 3.2.9.
>>
>> We should be able to make a public release by the middle of next week.
> 
> Thanks for pushing this through Jim.
> 
> In respect of testing in the future, can everyone make a note though which
> MPM, ie., worker or prefork , they are using when testing on UNIX like
> system. I would feel much more comfortable if I know there is a mix of
> prefork and worker across the range of UNIX like systems.

Good point. In the future when I send an email to the list requesting a
round of testing I'll include a reminder.

Jim

Re: mod_python 3.2.9-rc3 test results

Posted by Graham Dumpleton <gr...@dscpl.com.au>.
On 29/06/2006, at 9:29 PM, Jim Gallacher wrote:

> Here are the test results for 3.2.9 release candidate 3.
>
> +1 FreeBSD 6.1 / Apache 2.2 / Python 2.4.3
> +1 Linux Debian Sid, apache 2.0.55, python 2.3.5
> Linux (Fedora Core 4) on Intel x86, Apache 2.0.58, Python 2.4.3
> +1 Linux Slackware 10.1, Apache 2.0.55, Python 2.4.1
> +1 Linux Slackware 10.2, Apache 2.2.0, Python 2.4.1
> +1 Linux Zenwalk 2.6, Apache 2.2.2, Python 2.4.3
> +1 Mac OS X (PPC/10.4.6), Apache 2.0.55 (mpm/worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
> standard version)
> +1 Mac OS X (PPC/10.4.6), Apache 2.2.1 (mpm/worker), Python 2.3.5 (OS
> standard version)
> +1 MacOSX 10.4.6 Intel, Apache-2.0.55, apache-2.0.55
> +1 Windows XP SP2, Apache 2.0.58, ActivePython 2.4.3
>
> Unless there are any objections I'll tag and roll the 3.2.9 tarball
> today for a final round of testing. The final tarball will be  
> identical
> to 3.2.9-rc3, but with the version strings bumped to 3.2.9.
>
> We should be able to make a public release by the middle of next week.

Thanks for pushing this through Jim.

In respect of testing in the future, can everyone make a note though  
which
MPM, ie., worker or prefork , they are using when testing on UNIX like
system. I would feel much more comfortable if I know there is a mix of
prefork and worker across the range of UNIX like systems.

Thanks.

Graham