You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to p-dev@xerces.apache.org by John Utz <ut...@singingfish.com> on 2002/02/08 01:05:49 UTC
builds on redhat 7 Re: Experimental 1.6.0 release
hotay, so far so good. it built. no warnings
what's a good trivial test of the XMLSchema features? or would that be
something that i should contribute? :-)
oh, and what about IDOM vs DOM? i've followed that thread. should i just
use IDOM and forget about DOM?
On Thu, 7 Feb 2002, John Utz wrote:
> note that the README still indicates the need to have 1.5.2
>
> and, btw. thankyou very much for finding the time to put this out. i'll
> test it very aggressively because i am hoping to use it in my current
> project.
>
> On 7 Feb 2002, (Jason E. Stewart) wrote:
>
> > Hey All,
> >
> > I've made a beta release of XML-Xerces-1.6.0_0. It can be located at:
> >
> > http://xml.apache.org/dist/xerces-p/experimental/
> >
> > The only new features added are support for Xerces-C-1.6.0. Please let
> > me know how well this works, and I'll release a full version ASAP.
> >
> > Cheers,
> > jas.
> >
> > ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> > For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
> >
> >
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: More Experimental 1.6 Release questions
Posted by John Utz <ut...@singingfish.com>.
Wow, this has been some great info!
On Fri, 8 Feb 2002, David Starks-Browning wrote:
> On 8 Feb 02, Jason E. Stewart writes:
> > "John Utz" <ut...@singingfish.com> writes:
> >
> > > 1. Any reason why this shouldnt build/run on a win2kbox with cygwin and
> > > the latest activestate perl ( i am pretty sure that's 5.6.1 or so )?
> > > given a choice, i tend to prefer unix. but since the expensive part
> > > of this project is a windows app, and it's all supposed to be on one
> > > box, i am sorta stuck.
> >
> > I am led to believe that it is now possible to compile Xerces-C on
> > cygwin. Once upon a time it was not.
> >
> > However, if you compile Xerces under cygwin wit g++, you'll have to
> > compile perl with g++ as well - there's no standard ABI for C++, so
> > all your code has to be compiled using the same compiler. ActiveState
> > uses VC++.
blargh. that's a pretty vital fact i suspect. :-(. The app that i am
working with (Virage Video Application Server) actually makes heavy use of
perl but i dont know if they are linking in native bits somewhere. i'll
have to do some spelunking. if they dont have some special virage native
interface pm's then i am probably ok.
> Cygwin Setup now (optionally) includes perl. Presumably you'd have
> better chance of success with that. I haven't tried it myself. Our
> four unix platforms is challenging enough for me at the moment...
oh duh. that's right. i installed that! and now i've installed
activestate as well. great! :-(. i wish i had thought of that when i was
installing the virage stuff.
> Cheers,
> David
> (Cygwin FAQ maintainer)
>
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
> David Starks-Browning | starksb@ebi.ac.uk
> EMBL Outstation -- |
> The European Bioinformatics Institute |
> Wellcome Trust Genome Campus | tel: +44 (1223) 494 616
> Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK | fax: +44 (1223) 494 468
> -------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: More Experimental 1.6 Release questions
Posted by David Starks-Browning <st...@ebi.ac.uk>.
On 8 Feb 02, Jason E. Stewart writes:
> "John Utz" <ut...@singingfish.com> writes:
>
> > 1. Any reason why this shouldnt build/run on a win2kbox with cygwin and
> > the latest activestate perl ( i am pretty sure that's 5.6.1 or so )?
> > given a choice, i tend to prefer unix. but since the expensive part
> > of this project is a windows app, and it's all supposed to be on one
> > box, i am sorta stuck.
>
> I am led to believe that it is now possible to compile Xerces-C on
> cygwin. Once upon a time it was not.
>
> However, if you compile Xerces under cygwin wit g++, you'll have to
> compile perl with g++ as well - there's no standard ABI for C++, so
> all your code has to be compiled using the same compiler. ActiveState
> uses VC++.
Cygwin Setup now (optionally) includes perl. Presumably you'd have
better chance of success with that. I haven't tried it myself. Our
four unix platforms is challenging enough for me at the moment...
Cheers,
David
(Cygwin FAQ maintainer)
-------------------------------------------------------------------
David Starks-Browning | starksb@ebi.ac.uk
EMBL Outstation -- |
The European Bioinformatics Institute |
Wellcome Trust Genome Campus | tel: +44 (1223) 494 616
Hinxton, Cambridge, CB10 1SD, UK | fax: +44 (1223) 494 468
-------------------------------------------------------------------
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: More Experimental 1.6 Release questions
Posted by "Jason E. Stewart" <ja...@openinformatics.com>.
"John Utz" <ut...@singingfish.com> writes:
> 1. Any reason why this shouldnt build/run on a win2kbox with cygwin and
> the latest activestate perl ( i am pretty sure that's 5.6.1 or so )?
> given a choice, i tend to prefer unix. but since the expensive part
> of this project is a windows app, and it's all supposed to be on one
> box, i am sorta stuck.
I am led to believe that it is now possible to compile Xerces-C on
cygwin. Once upon a time it was not.
However, if you compile Xerces under cygwin wit g++, you'll have to
compile perl with g++ as well - there's no standard ABI for C++, so
all your code has to be compiled using the same compiler. ActiveState
uses VC++.
> 2. i am trying to make the schema for my application be the normative
> reference for both the data input *and* for the UI.
>
> so, if i have 3 elements in my schema named foo, bar and baz, i want to
> have a ui that references/incorporates foo, bar and baz. and when we
> change the name of baz to snert, i dont want to have to recode the ui.
>
> so, in xerces-j i could pick the thing apart using
> org.apache.xerces.dom3.as.
>
> but DOM3 isnt implemented in xerces-c/p yet. correct?
Correct.
> so, what's the old fashioned DOM2 way to pick apart the schema? I note
> that XMLValidator has a getGrammar that returns a Grammar object, but i
> dont see the definition of a Grammar in the class docs. is a Grammar a DOM
> of the schema? if i am barking up the wrong tree with Grammar (oh, bad,
> inadvertent, geek pun....), what data structure should i be looking at to
> snag the element descriptions out of?
With DTD's it was very hard to get at this information. Every answer I
ever got was: wait for DOM3 support. It might be easier now with
schemas, but I wouldn't hold my breath. However, this question is best
asked on the xerces-c-dev list, since I really don't know the answer.
jas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
More Experimental 1.6 Release questions
Posted by John Utz <ut...@singingfish.com>.
1. Any reason why this shouldnt build/run on a win2kbox with cygwin and
the latest activestate perl ( i am pretty sure that's 5.6.1 or so )?
given a choice, i tend to prefer unix. but since the expensive part of
this project is a windows app, and it's all supposed to be on one box, i
am sorta stuck.
if the answer is i dunno, that's fine. i'll try it and report back. if the
answer is that it cant work for some reason, then that's good to know,
cause then i gotta come up with a new plan. :-)
2. i am trying to make the schema for my application be the normative
reference for both the data input *and* for the UI.
so, if i have 3 elements in my schema named foo, bar and baz, i want to
have a ui that references/incorporates foo, bar and baz. and when we
change the name of baz to snert, i dont want to have to recode the ui.
so, in xerces-j i could pick the thing apart using
org.apache.xerces.dom3.as.
but DOM3 isnt implemented in xerces-c/p yet. correct?
so, what's the old fashioned DOM2 way to pick apart the schema? I note
that XMLValidator has a getGrammar that returns a Grammar object, but i
dont see the definition of a Grammar in the class docs. is a Grammar a DOM
of the schema? if i am barking up the wrong tree with Grammar (oh, bad,
inadvertent, geek pun....), what data structure should i be looking at to
snag the element descriptions out of?
tnx!
johnu
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org
Re: builds on redhat 7 Re: Experimental 1.6.0 release
Posted by "Jason E. Stewart" <ja...@openinformatics.com>.
"John Utz" <ut...@singingfish.com> writes:
> hotay, so far so good. it built. no warnings
Glad to hear it.
> what's a good trivial test of the XMLSchema features? or would that be
> something that i should contribute? :-)
I would be grateful to have more than the pathetic test that I wrote.
> oh, and what about IDOM vs DOM? i've followed that thread. should i just
> use IDOM and forget about DOM?
Actually, I will be completely replacing DOM with IDOM. For now, use
IDOM, and then for the next release you can just: 's/IDOM/DOM/g'
There are unsolvable memory problems with the current DOM that are
solved under IDOM.
jas.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: xerces-p-dev-help@xml.apache.org