You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@tomee.apache.org by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> on 2020/06/15 23:34:46 UTC
Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Got some information from Ed Bratt over Jakarta EE slack.
I've not dug into any of this, but wanted to pass it along immediately as the situation is fluid.
Nightly builds of the Jakarta EE 9 TCK are here:
- http://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/master/nightly/jakartaeetck-9.0.0.zip
- https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/master/nightly/jakartaeetckinfo.txt
Here's the current plan for releasing a Jakarta EE 9.0.0-M1 TCK this week:
- https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/328
Here's the status of GlassFish against the standalone TCKs (not the one above):
- https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/standalonetck-nightly-build-run-master/59/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
Here's the status of GlassFish with the overall Jakarta EE 9 TCK (the one above):
- https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaeetck-nightly-run-master/43/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
I'm going to try to see if I can get anything running on TomEE with the bytecode-modified dist.
I'm super rusty in this department, so I suspect it will be painful :) Wish me luck. :)
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Jun 15, 2020, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Got some information from Ed Bratt over Jakarta EE slack.
>
> I've not dug into any of this, but wanted to pass it along immediately as the situation is fluid.
>
> Nightly builds of the Jakarta EE 9 TCK are here:
>
> - http://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/master/nightly/jakartaeetck-9.0.0.zip
> - https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/master/nightly/jakartaeetckinfo.txt
Important link (thanks again Ed), here are the nightly GlassFish builds that go with that TCK:
- https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/build-glassfish/lastSuccessfulBuild/artifact/appserver/distributions/glassfish/target/glassfish.zip
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de.INVALID>.
cool, thanks. Much easier as having to build the TCK suit oneself ;)
LieGrue,
strub
> Am 16.06.2020 um 01:34 schrieb David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>:
>
> Got some information from Ed Bratt over Jakarta EE slack.
>
> I've not dug into any of this, but wanted to pass it along immediately as the situation is fluid.
>
> Nightly builds of the Jakarta EE 9 TCK are here:
>
> - http://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/master/nightly/jakartaeetck-9.0.0.zip
> - https://download.eclipse.org/ee4j/jakartaee-tck/master/nightly/jakartaeetckinfo.txt
>
> Here's the current plan for releasing a Jakarta EE 9.0.0-M1 TCK this week:
>
> - https://github.com/eclipse-ee4j/jakartaee-tck/issues/328
>
> Here's the status of GlassFish against the standalone TCKs (not the one above):
>
> - https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/standalonetck-nightly-build-run-master/59/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
>
> Here's the status of GlassFish with the overall Jakarta EE 9 TCK (the one above):
>
> - https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaeetck-nightly-run-master/43/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
>
> I'm going to try to see if I can get anything running on TomEE with the bytecode-modified dist.
>
> I'm super rusty in this department, so I suspect it will be painful :) Wish me luck. :)
>
>
> -David
>
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
I clicked on that link slightly worried that it was possibly me who
committed the change, and then can't remember it. :-).
> "connector, jaxrs and jaxws stuff ported blindly from the geronimo setup
no idea if it works"
To be fair, I think it worked :-)
Jon
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 4:02 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Jun 18, 2020, at 7:44 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > No idea. Those wars are quick to build and deploy, so I don't think its a
> > performance thing.
> >
> > Maybe when we first did this jax-rs wasn't part of webprofile (and hence
> we
> > had a jaxrs flavor of TomEE in addition to webprofile) - potentially
> those
> > wars would have failed to deploy on the webprofile version of TomEE. This
> > is all a guess, but might be feasible.
>
> <announcer-voice>
> And now we get to play the game "How Good Was The Commit Message!" The
> game everyone loves to play with themselves 10 years later. Did you
> document it well-enough to remember or were you lame?
>
> Here it is, the moment of truth. Roll out the commit message:
>
> -
> https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/commit/dd8266012c9cf1d19807ca511309e9fc19ab2efd
>
> "connector, jaxrs and jaxws stuff ported blindly from the geronimo
> setup no idea if it works"
>
> Oh, I'm sorry. You lose. Looks like past David was lame. Looks like you
> do win our Cargo Cult Programming consolation prize. A prize you might
> enjoy, but won't know why.
>
> Better luck next time in "How Good Was The Commit Message!"
>
> *audience applause*
> </announcer-voice>
>
> Seriously though, I've filed a ticket so we remember to remove it at some
> point :)
>
> - https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2850
>
>
> -David
>
>
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 7:44 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> No idea. Those wars are quick to build and deploy, so I don't think its a
> performance thing.
>
> Maybe when we first did this jax-rs wasn't part of webprofile (and hence we
> had a jaxrs flavor of TomEE in addition to webprofile) - potentially those
> wars would have failed to deploy on the webprofile version of TomEE. This
> is all a guess, but might be feasible.
<announcer-voice>
And now we get to play the game "How Good Was The Commit Message!" The game everyone loves to play with themselves 10 years later. Did you document it well-enough to remember or were you lame?
Here it is, the moment of truth. Roll out the commit message:
- https://github.com/apache/tomee-tck/commit/dd8266012c9cf1d19807ca511309e9fc19ab2efd
"connector, jaxrs and jaxws stuff ported blindly from the geronimo setup no idea if it works"
Oh, I'm sorry. You lose. Looks like past David was lame. Looks like you do win our Cargo Cult Programming consolation prize. A prize you might enjoy, but won't know why.
Better luck next time in "How Good Was The Commit Message!"
*audience applause*
</announcer-voice>
Seriously though, I've filed a ticket so we remember to remove it at some point :)
- https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TOMEE-2850
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
No idea. Those wars are quick to build and deploy, so I don't think its a
performance thing.
Maybe when we first did this jax-rs wasn't part of webprofile (and hence we
had a jaxrs flavor of TomEE in addition to webprofile) - potentially those
wars would have failed to deploy on the webprofile version of TomEE. This
is all a guess, but might be feasible.
Jon
On Thu, Jun 18, 2020 at 3:39 PM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
>
> > On Jun 18, 2020, at 4:18 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <
> jonathan.gallimore@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> > Thanks for this David. I managed to get this working on my setup here.
> Are
> > there any patterns you've noticed? I've done a couple of runs, and the
> > embedded cases seem to fail, which I guess I'd expect. Looking for some
> > ways to usefully dig in.
> >
> > I have some JAX-RS tests passing - did you include the '-j' parameter?
> >
> > e.g: ./runtests -w tomee-plume -nc -j com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs
>
> I didn't include the -j parameter. Do you remember why we introduced it?
>
>
> -David
>
> > On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:22 AM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> > wrote:
> >
> >>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> >> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I'm going to try to see if I can get anything running on TomEE with the
> >> bytecode-modified dist.
> >>>
> >>> I'm super rusty in this department, so I suspect it will be painful :)
> >> Wish me luck. :)
> >>
> >> Are you ready to celebrate?
> >>
> >> I present some of our first passes/results with the Jakarta EE 9 TCK!
> >>
> >> These are just small chucks of tests, but it looks not bad:
> >>
> >>
> >> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.lite.basic.stateless
> >>
> >> Passed: 28 Failed: 7 Errors: 0
> >> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/406cb0ab4a73fd18086738ffed1b73ae
> >>
> >>
> >> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.servlet.api
> >>
> >> Passed: 814 Failed: 33 Errors: 0
> >> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/2052efeffaeabcdee8e643b12791cedd
> >>
> >>
> >> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.jpa.core.basic
> >>
> >> Passed: 12 Failed: 0 Errors: 0
> >> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/49e2ccfa4a742d244e817be8ba1f504d
> >>
> >> Again, just a small sampling but they look pretty good.
> >>
> >> JAX-RS doesn't look happy, however, and seems to return all 404s. I'll
> >> check it out tomorrow.
> >>
> >> If we wanted to push out something this week, I think it looks really
> good.
> >>
> >>
> >> -David
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>
>
>
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Jun 18, 2020, at 4:18 AM, Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Thanks for this David. I managed to get this working on my setup here. Are
> there any patterns you've noticed? I've done a couple of runs, and the
> embedded cases seem to fail, which I guess I'd expect. Looking for some
> ways to usefully dig in.
>
> I have some JAX-RS tests passing - did you include the '-j' parameter?
>
> e.g: ./runtests -w tomee-plume -nc -j com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs
I didn't include the -j parameter. Do you remember why we introduced it?
-David
> On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:22 AM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>>> On Jun 15, 2020, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> I'm going to try to see if I can get anything running on TomEE with the
>> bytecode-modified dist.
>>>
>>> I'm super rusty in this department, so I suspect it will be painful :)
>> Wish me luck. :)
>>
>> Are you ready to celebrate?
>>
>> I present some of our first passes/results with the Jakarta EE 9 TCK!
>>
>> These are just small chucks of tests, but it looks not bad:
>>
>>
>> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.lite.basic.stateless
>>
>> Passed: 28 Failed: 7 Errors: 0
>> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/406cb0ab4a73fd18086738ffed1b73ae
>>
>>
>> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.servlet.api
>>
>> Passed: 814 Failed: 33 Errors: 0
>> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/2052efeffaeabcdee8e643b12791cedd
>>
>>
>> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.jpa.core.basic
>>
>> Passed: 12 Failed: 0 Errors: 0
>> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/49e2ccfa4a742d244e817be8ba1f504d
>>
>> Again, just a small sampling but they look pretty good.
>>
>> JAX-RS doesn't look happy, however, and seems to return all 404s. I'll
>> check it out tomorrow.
>>
>> If we wanted to push out something this week, I think it looks really good.
>>
>>
>> -David
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by Jonathan Gallimore <jo...@gmail.com>.
Thanks for this David. I managed to get this working on my setup here. Are
there any patterns you've noticed? I've done a couple of runs, and the
embedded cases seem to fail, which I guess I'd expect. Looking for some
ways to usefully dig in.
I have some JAX-RS tests passing - did you include the '-j' parameter?
e.g: ./runtests -w tomee-plume -nc -j com.sun.ts.tests.jaxrs
Jon
On Wed, Jun 17, 2020 at 4:22 AM David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
wrote:
> > On Jun 15, 2020, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> > I'm going to try to see if I can get anything running on TomEE with the
> bytecode-modified dist.
> >
> > I'm super rusty in this department, so I suspect it will be painful :)
> Wish me luck. :)
>
> Are you ready to celebrate?
>
> I present some of our first passes/results with the Jakarta EE 9 TCK!
>
> These are just small chucks of tests, but it looks not bad:
>
>
> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.lite.basic.stateless
>
> Passed: 28 Failed: 7 Errors: 0
> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/406cb0ab4a73fd18086738ffed1b73ae
>
>
> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.servlet.api
>
> Passed: 814 Failed: 33 Errors: 0
> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/2052efeffaeabcdee8e643b12791cedd
>
>
> ./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.jpa.core.basic
>
> Passed: 12 Failed: 0 Errors: 0
> https://gist.github.com/dblevins/49e2ccfa4a742d244e817be8ba1f504d
>
> Again, just a small sampling but they look pretty good.
>
> JAX-RS doesn't look happy, however, and seems to return all 404s. I'll
> check it out tomorrow.
>
> If we wanted to push out something this week, I think it looks really good.
>
>
> -David
>
>
>
>
>
>
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Jun 15, 2020, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I'm going to try to see if I can get anything running on TomEE with the bytecode-modified dist.
>
> I'm super rusty in this department, so I suspect it will be painful :) Wish me luck. :)
Are you ready to celebrate?
I present some of our first passes/results with the Jakarta EE 9 TCK!
These are just small chucks of tests, but it looks not bad:
./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.ejb30.lite.basic.stateless
Passed: 28 Failed: 7 Errors: 0
https://gist.github.com/dblevins/406cb0ab4a73fd18086738ffed1b73ae
./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.servlet.api
Passed: 814 Failed: 33 Errors: 0
https://gist.github.com/dblevins/2052efeffaeabcdee8e643b12791cedd
./runtests -w tomee-plume -c com.sun.ts.tests.jpa.core.basic
Passed: 12 Failed: 0 Errors: 0
https://gist.github.com/dblevins/49e2ccfa4a742d244e817be8ba1f504d
Again, just a small sampling but they look pretty good.
JAX-RS doesn't look happy, however, and seems to return all 404s. I'll check it out tomorrow.
If we wanted to push out something this week, I think it looks really good.
-David
Re: Jakarta EE 9 TCK information (in progress)
Posted by David Blevins <da...@gmail.com>.
> On Jun 15, 2020, at 4:34 PM, David Blevins <da...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Here's the status of GlassFish with the overall Jakarta EE 9 TCK (the one above):
>
> - https://ci.eclipse.org/jakartaee-tck/job/jakartaeetck-nightly-run-master/43/junit-reports-with-handlebars/testSuitesOverview.html
I'll add there looks to be plenty of room for us to be competitive on the Jakarta EE 9 Milestone.
It could send a very strong signal if we were able to be there and passing some tests.
-David