You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Daan Hoogland <DH...@schubergphilis.com> on 2013/08/07 12:24:02 UTC
[Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev
the three from week 30 where still open. I asked for clarification on some of them.
one is from Ian who has been present enough on this list to take care of himself.
This week there is only one (disgarding Mins direct addressing of John :)
I am not bothering you with this one as I responded with a witty question a minute ago.
net result: no mails from week 31 where without response,
Daan Hoogland
Re: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev
Posted by Daan Hoogland <da...@gmail.com>.
less and less a problem :P
On Wed, Aug 7, 2013 at 4:34 PM, Musayev, Ilya <im...@webmd.net> wrote:
> Daan, thanks a million for doing this!
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]
>> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM
>> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
>> Subject: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev
>>
>> the three from week 30 where still open. I asked for clarification on some of
>> them.
>>
>> one is from Ian who has been present enough on this list to take care of
>> himself.
>> This week there is only one (disgarding Mins direct addressing of John :)
>>
>> I am not bothering you with this one as I responded with a witty question a
>> minute ago.
>>
>> net result: no mails from week 31 where without response, Daan Hoogland
>
>
RE: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev
Posted by "Musayev, Ilya" <im...@webmd.net>.
Daan, thanks a million for doing this!
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Daan Hoogland [mailto:DHoogland@schubergphilis.com]
> Sent: Wednesday, August 07, 2013 6:24 AM
> To: dev@cloudstack.apache.org
> Subject: [Responsiveness report] 2013w31 dev
>
> the three from week 30 where still open. I asked for clarification on some of
> them.
>
> one is from Ian who has been present enough on this list to take care of
> himself.
> This week there is only one (disgarding Mins direct addressing of John :)
>
> I am not bothering you with this one as I responded with a witty question a
> minute ago.
>
> net result: no mails from week 31 where without response, Daan Hoogland