You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@qpid.apache.org by Pavel Moravec <pm...@redhat.com> on 2014/06/18 14:01:51 UTC
[C++ broker] Worth removing FTD related stats?
Hi all,
getting some queue statistics, I realized there are legacy stats like:
byteFtdDepth
byteFtdDequeues
byteFtdEnqueues
msgFtdDepth
msgFtdDequeues
msgFtdEnqueues
that refer to already removed flow-to-disk queue limit policy. As far as I checked, the code changing the stats is a dead code.
Is it worth removing the stats counters from management schema (together with the dead code), or does it make sense to keep it there due to some backward compatibility reasons?
Kind regards,
Pavel
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [C++ broker] Worth removing FTD related stats?
Posted by Chuck Rolke <cr...@redhat.com>.
An example of a deleted statistic that was restored is in https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/QPID-5355
The accepted restoration described the statistic as Deprecated:
{noformat}
+ <statistic name="framesOutstanding" type="count32" desc="Deprecated"/>
+
{noformat}
-Chuck
----- Original Message -----
> From: "Justin Ross" <jr...@apache.org>
> To: users@qpid.apache.org
> Sent: Wednesday, June 18, 2014 9:10:44 AM
> Subject: Re: [C++ broker] Worth removing FTD related stats?
>
> On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Pavel Moravec <pm...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> > Hi all,
> > getting some queue statistics, I realized there are legacy stats like:
> >
> > byteFtdDepth
> > byteFtdDequeues
> > byteFtdEnqueues
> > msgFtdDepth
> > msgFtdDequeues
> > msgFtdEnqueues
> >
> > that refer to already removed flow-to-disk queue limit policy. As far as I
> > checked, the code changing the stats is a dead code.
> >
> > Is it worth removing the stats counters from management schema (together
> > with the dead code), or does it make sense to keep it there due to some
> > backward compatibility reasons?
> >
>
> We have to keep them, but they can be set to static values.
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: users-unsubscribe@qpid.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: users-help@qpid.apache.org
Re: [C++ broker] Worth removing FTD related stats?
Posted by Justin Ross <jr...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Jun 18, 2014 at 8:01 AM, Pavel Moravec <pm...@redhat.com> wrote:
> Hi all,
> getting some queue statistics, I realized there are legacy stats like:
>
> byteFtdDepth
> byteFtdDequeues
> byteFtdEnqueues
> msgFtdDepth
> msgFtdDequeues
> msgFtdEnqueues
>
> that refer to already removed flow-to-disk queue limit policy. As far as I
> checked, the code changing the stats is a dead code.
>
> Is it worth removing the stats counters from management schema (together
> with the dead code), or does it make sense to keep it there due to some
> backward compatibility reasons?
>
We have to keep them, but they can be set to static values.