You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Don O'Neil <li...@lizardhill.com> on 2007/03/08 01:47:26 UTC
Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering performance
would go down? A lot more spam seems to be getting through since I updated
yesterday. Maybe it's just a lucky coincedence... But I'm wondering if there
is some configration tweak I did before that got overwritten...
Any ideas?
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Maciej Friedel <bi...@wwv.pl>.
On 03/07/07 Don wrote:
> No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
> I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
> error: gpg required but not found!
try this
sa-update -D --nogpg
--
|_|0|_| Maciej Friedel <bi...@wwv.pl>
|_|_|0| http://wwv.pl - usługi hostingowe
|0|0|0| http://eprogram.pl - projektowanie stron www
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Jim Knuth <jk...@jkart.de>.
Heute (08.03.2007/02:34 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
> What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on
> the spamassassin.org page.
Please don`t top post.
Which OS you are using? On Debian:
apt-cache search gpg
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
jk@jkart.de
ICQ #277289867
----------
Zufalls-Zitat
----------
Was du bist hängt von drei Faktoren ab: Was du geerbt hast,
was deine Umgebung aus dir machte und was du in freier
Wahlaus dener Umgebung und deinem Erbe gemacht hast.
(Aldous Huxley)
----------
Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
----------
Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Jim Knuth <jk...@jkart.de>.
Heute (08.03.2007/03:10 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
> Thanks that did it... :-) sa-update works great now.
> How often are rulesets updated? Should I set sa-update to run on cron daily?
This is indefinite. And no, not needed. Spare your ressources an
make it manually. ;)
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
jk@jkart.de
ICQ #277289867
----------
Zufalls-Zitat
----------
Der Zweck heiligt die Mittel. Dies muß sich der liebe Gott
gedacht haben, als er das Weib erschuf. (Thomas
Niederreuther)
----------
Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
----------
Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
RE: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Don O'Neil <li...@lizardhill.com>.
Thanks that did it... :-) sa-update works great now.
How often are rulesets updated? Should I set sa-update to run on cron daily?
-----Original Message-----
From: David Goldsmith [mailto:dgoldsmith@sans.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:49 PM
To: spam mailling list
Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ok, as soon as I hit Send, I realized this is only half the answer.
The second half is: GnuPG - http://www.gnupg.org/
David Goldsmith
David Goldsmith wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
>
> David Goldsmith
>
> Don O'Neil wrote:
>> What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to
>> it on the spamassassin.org page.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:jk@jkart.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:25 PM
>> To: Don O'Neil
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
>
>> Heute (08.03.2007/02:02 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
>
>>> No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
>>> I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
>>> error: gpg required but not found!
>>> I have no idea what this means.
>> you have no gpg installed ;)
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM
>>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
>>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
>>>> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering
>>>> performance would go down?
>>> If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
>>> --
>>> Randomly Selected Tagline:
>>> "From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
>>> I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski
>> --
>> Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
>> Jim Knuth
>> jk@jkart.de
>> ICQ #277289867
>> ----------
>> Zufalls-Zitat
>> ----------
>> Wer seine Träume verwiklichen will, muss wach sein.
>> ----------
>> Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
>> ----------
>> Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
>
>
>
>
- --
"My company will receive a ten fold return from the investment in SANS
Security training."
Cary Polk, Humanna Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF72t2417vU8/9QfkRAozxAKCjs3gWEOZxmK8QfkFrFaupjPaMHwCeLcdG
FEJWjHKn+3wjyYcUZNjJHfQ=
=DPyH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by David Goldsmith <dg...@sans.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Ok, as soon as I hit Send, I realized this is only half the answer.
The second half is: GnuPG - http://www.gnupg.org/
David Goldsmith
David Goldsmith wrote:
> http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
>
> David Goldsmith
>
> Don O'Neil wrote:
>> What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on
>> the spamassassin.org page.
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:jk@jkart.de]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:25 PM
>> To: Don O'Neil
>> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
>
>> Heute (08.03.2007/02:02 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
>
>>> No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
>>> I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
>>> error: gpg required but not found!
>>> I have no idea what this means.
>> you have no gpg installed ;)
>
>>> -----Original Message-----
>>> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@apache.org]
>>> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM
>>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>>> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
>>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
>>>> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering
>>>> performance would go down?
>>> If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
>>> --
>>> Randomly Selected Tagline:
>>> "From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
>>> I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski
>> --
>> Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
>> Jim Knuth
>> jk@jkart.de
>> ICQ #277289867
>> ----------
>> Zufalls-Zitat
>> ----------
>> Wer seine Träume verwiklichen will, muss wach sein.
>> ----------
>> Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
>> ----------
>> Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
>
>
>
>
- --
"My company will receive a ten fold return from the investment in SANS
Security training."
Cary Polk, Humanna Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF72t2417vU8/9QfkRAozxAKCjs3gWEOZxmK8QfkFrFaupjPaMHwCeLcdG
FEJWjHKn+3wjyYcUZNjJHfQ=
=DPyH
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by David Goldsmith <dg...@sans.org>.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
http://wiki.apache.org/spamassassin/RuleUpdates
David Goldsmith
Don O'Neil wrote:
> What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on
> the spamassassin.org page.
>
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Jim Knuth [mailto:jk@jkart.de]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:25 PM
> To: Don O'Neil
> Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
>
> Heute (08.03.2007/02:02 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
>
>> No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
>
>> I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
>
>> error: gpg required but not found!
>
>> I have no idea what this means.
>
> you have no gpg installed ;)
>
>> -----Original Message-----
>> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@apache.org]
>> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM
>> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
>> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
>
>> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
>>> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering
>>> performance would go down?
>
>> If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
>
>> --
>> Randomly Selected Tagline:
>> "From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
>> I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski
>
> --
> Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
> Jim Knuth
> jk@jkart.de
> ICQ #277289867
> ----------
> Zufalls-Zitat
> ----------
> Wer seine Träume verwiklichen will, muss wach sein.
> ----------
> Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
> ----------
> Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
>
>
- --
"My company will receive a ten fold return from the investment in SANS
Security training."
Cary Polk, Humanna Inc.
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.7 (MingW32)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iD8DBQFF72pJ417vU8/9QfkRAkbVAJ0aIaQedFnJKTh9oyA78b6089+XXQCeNneA
7WaKs1n/viOHbPfeL9rJyAc=
=ULWM
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
RE: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Don O'Neil <li...@lizardhill.com>.
What is gpg and where do I get it? I couldn't find any reference to it on
the spamassassin.org page.
-----Original Message-----
From: Jim Knuth [mailto:jk@jkart.de]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 5:25 PM
To: Don O'Neil
Cc: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Heute (08.03.2007/02:02 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
> No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
> I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
> error: gpg required but not found!
> I have no idea what this means.
you have no gpg installed ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
>> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering
>> performance would go down?
> If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
> --
> Randomly Selected Tagline:
> "From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
> I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
jk@jkart.de
ICQ #277289867
----------
Zufalls-Zitat
----------
Wer seine Träume verwiklichen will, muss wach sein.
----------
Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
----------
Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Jim Knuth <jk...@jkart.de>.
Heute (08.03.2007/02:02 Uhr) schrieb Don O'Neil,
> No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
> I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
> error: gpg required but not found!
> I have no idea what this means.
you have no gpg installed ;)
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@apache.org]
> Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM
> To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
> Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
> On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
>> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering
>> performance would go down?
> If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
> --
> Randomly Selected Tagline:
> "From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
> I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski
--
Viele Gruesse, Kind regards,
Jim Knuth
jk@jkart.de
ICQ #277289867
----------
Zufalls-Zitat
----------
Wer seine Träume verwiklichen will, muss wach sein.
----------
Der Text hat nichts mit dem Empfaenger der Mail zu tun
----------
Virus free. Checked by NOD32 Version 2101 Build 9221 07.03.2007
RE: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Don O'Neil <li...@lizardhill.com>.
No, all I did is download the package and build/install it.
I tried running sa-update just now and got this:
error: gpg required but not found!
I have no idea what this means.
-----Original Message-----
From: Theo Van Dinter [mailto:felicity@apache.org]
Sent: Wednesday, March 07, 2007 4:53 PM
To: users@spamassassin.apache.org
Subject: Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering
> performance would go down?
If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski
Re: Upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8... Not as good filtering?
Posted by Theo Van Dinter <fe...@apache.org>.
On Wed, Mar 07, 2007 at 04:47:26PM -0800, Don O'Neil wrote:
> Anyone know why when I upgraded from 3.1.7 to 3.1.8 my filtering performance
> would go down?
If you use sa-update, did you run it after updating?
--
Randomly Selected Tagline:
"From what I'd seen of British TV, some shows use the word bastard like
I use a comma." - J. Michael Straczynski