You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@couchdb.apache.org by Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> on 2010/07/09 18:55:31 UTC
[VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Hello,
I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
Changes in this round:
* Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
We are voting on the following release artifacts:
http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
Happy voting,
N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Benoit Chesneau <bc...@gmail.com>.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 6:55 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
+ 1
js tests pass
make check pass
tested with some applications
tested on OpenBSD 4.7-current (erlang R13B04), OSX 10.6.4 (erlang R14a)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Sebastian Cohnen <se...@googlemail.com>.
Yes I ran the test in safe mode.
But today it looks better. I redownloaded the archive, did ./configure && make check, and ran the test suite once more. Success on the first run and _much_ faster than yesterday. Looks okay now for me and I'll check 0.11.1 again. Maybe just a system hiccup :)
change my vote to +1 and sorry for the noise
Sebastian
On 09.07.2010, at 23:12, Damien Katz wrote:
> Sebastian, is Firebug is completely disabled? Firebug tends to cause some odd behaviors. It sounds like you already have disabled it (via safe mode?), but I want to be sure.
>
> -Damien
>
>
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>
>> On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>>
>>>
>>> On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>>>
>>>> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
>>>>
>>>
>>> Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache?
>>
>> I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration test suite more and more).
>>
>>> Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the source directory:
>>>
>>> test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes passes)
>>
>> "ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test and tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not ok 16 cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication ReferenceError: $ is not defined").
>>
>>
>> Sebastian
>>
>>> Chris
>>>
>>>> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute).
>>>>
>>>> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong)
>>
>> *snip*
>>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Damien Katz <da...@apache.org>.
Sebastian, is Firebug is completely disabled? Firebug tends to cause some odd behaviors. It sounds like you already have disabled it (via safe mode?), but I want to be sure.
-Damien
On Jul 9, 2010, at 4:09 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
> On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>>
>>> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
>>>
>>
>> Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache?
>
> I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration test suite more and more).
>
>> Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the source directory:
>>
>> test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes passes)
>
> "ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test and tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not ok 16 cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication ReferenceError: $ is not defined").
>
>
> Sebastian
>
>> Chris
>>
>>> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute).
>>>
>>> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong)
>
> *snip*
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Sebastian Cohnen <se...@googlemail.com>.
On 09.07.2010, at 21:55, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
>
>> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
>>
>
> Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache?
I run Firefox in safemode, when running the test suite. but running it in normal mode (with firebug & co) I always clear the cache. so yes, I ensured that the cache was empty. (I begin to dislike a browser-based integration test suite more and more).
> Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the source directory:
>
> test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes passes)
"ok 11 changes" looks okay. but after some tests (e.g. "ok 26 http") it simply freezes. I've waited a few minutes, killed both couch and the test and tried again. after the 10th run, the test suite runs through (with "not ok 16 cookie_auth TypeError: ddoc is null" and "not ok 43 replication ReferenceError: $ is not defined").
Sebastian
> Chris
>
>> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute).
>>
>> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong)
*snip*
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@gmail.com>.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:44 PM, Sebastian Cohnen wrote:
> OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
>
Have you ensured that you've cleared the browser cache?
Also, with Couch running on 5984, what do you get if you run this from the source directory:
test/javascript/run (I get some failures like this, no biggie, but changes passes)
Chris
> signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute).
>
> -1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong)
>
> On 09.07.2010, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>>
>> Changes in this round:
>>
>> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>>
>> Happy voting,
>>
>> N
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Sebastian Cohnen <se...@googlemail.com>.
OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.2.6) Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
signature, make check, all okay. test suite: all okay, but the changes test however always fails (Exception raised: "timeout: bar-only") when I run all test, I've tried about 10 times now. when I run this test in isolation it is successful most of the time, but not always 3 fails out of 10. I have not yet pinpoint the responsible part of the test, that causes the failure, but I notice, that for long periods of time the test simply does nothing (I see "[info] [<0.8991.0>] 127.0.0.1 - - 'GET' /test_suite_db/_changes?feed=continuous&timeout=500 200" and then nothing for about a minute).
-1 (unless someone can tell me, what I could have done wrong)
On 09.07.2010, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Juhani Ränkimies <ju...@juranki.com>.
WinXP SP3, icu 4.2.1, js1.8.0-rc1, curl 7.19.7
Erlang R14A (erts-5.8) [source] [rq:1] [async-threads:0]
Futon tests pass!
Should `make check` work on windows? It doesn't for me.
Here is the result of manually running prove on etap tests.
$ (cd test/etap/ && prove *.t)
001-load.t ......................... ok
002-icu-driver.t ................... Dubious, test returned 127 (wstat
32512, 0x7f00)
Failed 3/3 subtests
010-file-basics.t .................. ok
011-file-headers.t ................. Conflicting -start_erl and -boot options
011-file-headers.t ................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
020-btree-basics.t ................. Conflicting -start_erl and -boot options
020-btree-basics.t ................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
021-btree-reductions.t ............. Conflicting -start_erl and -boot options
021-btree-reductions.t ............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
030-doc-from-json.t ................
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
030-doc-from-json.t ................ Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
031-doc-to-json.t ..................
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
031-doc-to-json.t .................. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
040-util.t ......................... Failed 1/14 subtests
041-uuid-gen.t .....................
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
041-uuid-gen.t ..................... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 6/6 subtests
050-stream.t ....................... ok
060-kt-merging.t ................... ok
061-kt-missing-leaves.t ............ ok
062-kt-remove-leaves.t ............. ok
063-kt-get-leaves.t ................ ok
064-kt-counting.t .................. ok
065-kt-stemming.t .................. ok
070-couch-db.t .....................
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
070-couch-db.t ..................... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 4/4 subtests
080-config-get-set.t ...............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
080-config-get-set.t ............... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
081-config-override.t ..............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
081-config-override.t .............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
082-config-register.t ..............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
082-config-register.t .............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
083-config-no-files.t .............. ok
090-task-status.t .................. ok
100-ref-counter.t .................. ok
110-replication-httpc.t ............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
110-replication-httpc.t ............ Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 6/6 subtests
111-replication-changes-feed.t .....
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
111-replication-changes-feed.t ..... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 13/13 subtests
112-replication-missing-revs.t .....
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
112-replication-missing-revs.t ..... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 12/12 subtests
113-replication-attachment-comp.t ..
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
113-replication-attachment-comp.t .. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 30/30 subtests
120-stats-collect.t ................ ok
121-stats-aggregates.t .............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
121-stats-aggregates.t ............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
No subtests run
130-attachments-md5.t ..............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
130-attachments-md5.t .............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 16/16 subtests
140-attachment-comp.t ..............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
140-attachment-comp.t .............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 78/78 subtests
150-invalid-view-seq.t .............
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
150-invalid-view-seq.t ............. Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 10/10 subtests
160-vhosts.t .......................
Crash dump was written to: erl_crash.dump
init terminating in do_boot ()
160-vhosts.t ....................... Dubious, test returned 1 (wstat 256, 0x100)
Failed 4/4 subtests
Test Summary Report
-------------------
002-icu-driver.t (Wstat: 32512 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 127
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 3 tests but ran 0.
011-file-headers.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
020-btree-basics.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
021-btree-reductions.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
030-doc-from-json.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
031-doc-to-json.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
040-util.t (Wstat: 0 Tests: 14 Failed: 1)
Failed test: 6
041-uuid-gen.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 6 tests but ran 0.
070-couch-db.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
080-config-get-set.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
081-config-override.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
082-config-register.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
110-replication-httpc.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 6 tests but ran 0.
111-replication-changes-feed.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 13 tests but ran 0.
112-replication-missing-revs.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 12 tests but ran 0.
113-replication-attachment-comp.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 30 tests but ran 0.
121-stats-aggregates.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: No plan found in TAP output
130-attachments-md5.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 16 tests but ran 0.
140-attachment-comp.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 78 tests but ran 0.
150-invalid-view-seq.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 10 tests but ran 0.
160-vhosts.t (Wstat: 256 Tests: 0 Failed: 0)
Non-zero exit status: 1
Parse errors: Bad plan. You planned 4 tests but ran 0.
Files=34, Tests=165, 38 wallclock secs ( 0.20 usr 0.17 sys + 3.75
cusr 1.40 csys = 5.52 CPU)
Result: FAIL
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 7:55 PM, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
[VOTE RESULTS] (was Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round)
Posted by Noah Slater <ns...@apache.org>.
Hello,
The final tally of the vote is:
15 +1 votes
This exceeds the required minimum three +1 votes and the proposal passes.
I shall prepare the release as soon as possible.
The individual votes are as follows:
+1 J Chris Anderson
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c8DE5F136-2379-40F6-B6BE-9159C860FB9B@apache.org%3e
+1 Damien Katz
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c6F13E193-2B81-45FE-90F3-8DFBB66D76D8@apache.org%3e
+1 Robert Newson
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cAANLkTinXh7rWkgXWETHUgGocU8GDSdvJaXiM-k1ovJit@mail.gmail.com%3e
+1 Randall Leeds
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cAANLkTimHZK-hZjenwMpXBfgLcb8A8GVdSapjLJIlzPEu@mail.gmail.com%3e
+1 Sebastian Cohnen
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c7CAC4BCD-22EA-4672-9DB6-E04C2491E032@googlemail.com%3e
+1 Robert Dionne
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cC906E73E-4EC5-402D-AC72-C060529DB6B9@dionne-associates.com%3e
+1 Jan Lehnardt
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c0C5A5990-89C8-4047-A31E-3F9E774CC69D@apache.org%3e
+1 Klaus Trainer
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c1278757228.19515.99.camel@devil%3e
+1 Volker Mische
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c4C38540A.40601@gmail.com%3e
+1 Dave Cottlehuber
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cAANLkTikTJT2QvVjuptsf1f7FxH26AXazNkcAaPcPi84Q@mail.gmail.com%3e
+1 Eric Carlson
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3c4C389A9C.8040604@ericcarlson.co.uk%3e
+1 Russell Branca
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cAANLkTim1Pe85cslZ2XIyCQF13C5sPqJFtkEWsiZmLgDh@mail.gmail.com%3e
+1 Zachary Zolton
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cAANLkTilGAsLbRoTOH-wzD0lFeC0aNKmxB17lrFU1s78L@mail.gmail.com%3e
+1 Benoit Chesneau
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cAANLkTin-1P4ll44_ln1HTRKixKPGyjeAgJZCtYy0rzgR@mail.gmail.com%3e
+1 Adam Kocoloski
http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/couchdb-dev/201007.mbox/%3cBC0C39D9-A155-4583-B3AB-221DF99419AD@apache.org%3e
Thanks to everyone who voted.
Best,
N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Randall Leeds <ra...@gmail.com>.
+1
make check passes
futon tests pass
Ubuntu 10.04 x86_64
Firefox 3.6.6 (xulrunner 1.9.2.6)
Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2]
[async-threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 09:55, Noah Slater <ns...@tumbolia.org> wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Klaus Trainer <kl...@web.de>.
+1
All tests (Futon, make check) pass successfully.
Ubuntu 10.04 amd64, Erlang R13B03, Spidermonkey 1.8.1.16
- Klaus
On Fri, 2010-07-09 at 17:55 +0100, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Jan Lehnardt <ja...@apache.org>.
On 9 Jul 2010, at 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> […]
>
> Happy voting,
+1 (still very happy)
Signature and hashes match.
`make check` passes, browser tests all pass on:
Mac OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04, Spidermonkey 1.8, Firefox 3.6.6
OpenSolaris 11 / SunOS 5.11, Erlang R14A, Spidermonkey 1.7, Firefox 3.1b3
Ubuntu Lucid (Upgraded from Karmic), Erlang R13B03, Spidermonkey 1.7, Firefox 3.6.6
Cheers
Jan
--
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Mark Hammond <sk...@gmail.com>.
On 11/07/2010 2:06 AM, Eric Carlson wrote:
> Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on
> Windows. Has anyone else?
I successfully built R14A and the couch trunk a week or so ago and
reported the results here (which I believe were subsequently addressed).
Unfortunately I'm probably not going to get a chance to try again
until I return from my current trip - about a week away...
Mark
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Zachary Zolton <za...@gmail.com>.
+1
Mac OS X 10.6.4, Erlang R13B04.
Make check and Futon test all passed.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 5:09 PM, Russell Branca <ch...@gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Eric Carlson <er...@ericcarlson.co.uk> wrote:
>> +1
>>
>> make check & futon tests all pass sucessfully
>>
>> Ubuntu Lucid, Erlang R13B03, xulrunner-1.9.2.6, Firefox 3.6.6
>>
>> Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on
>> Windows. Has anyone else? Given that something like 90% of the computers
>> out there are running Windows, it might be good to know if it works
>> before releasing 1.0.
>>
>> Eric
>>
>>
>
> +1
>
> All futon and make check tests pass on Ubuntu 10.04 64bit with Erlang R13B03.
>
>
> -Russell
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Russell Branca <ch...@gmail.com>.
On Sat, Jul 10, 2010 at 9:06 AM, Eric Carlson <er...@ericcarlson.co.uk> wrote:
> +1
>
> make check & futon tests all pass sucessfully
>
> Ubuntu Lucid, Erlang R13B03, xulrunner-1.9.2.6, Firefox 3.6.6
>
> Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on
> Windows. Has anyone else? Given that something like 90% of the computers
> out there are running Windows, it might be good to know if it works
> before releasing 1.0.
>
> Eric
>
>
+1
All futon and make check tests pass on Ubuntu 10.04 64bit with Erlang R13B03.
-Russell
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Eric Carlson <er...@ericcarlson.co.uk>.
+1
make check & futon tests all pass sucessfully
Ubuntu Lucid, Erlang R13B03, xulrunner-1.9.2.6, Firefox 3.6.6
Haven't yet managed to get Erlang R14A/Couch to build successfully on
Windows. Has anyone else? Given that something like 90% of the computers
out there are running Windows, it might be good to know if it works
before releasing 1.0.
Eric
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Dave Cottlehuber <da...@muse.net.nz>.
+1
& I sorted my build process out too thanks jan@
make check + futon tests all OK
Mac OS X 10.6.4
Erlang R13B04 (erts-5.7.5) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2]
[async-threads:0] [hipe] [kernel-poll:false]
icu4c-4.3.1
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-GB; rv:1.9.2.6)
Gecko/20100625 Firefox/3.6.6
A+
Dave
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Volker Mische <vo...@gmail.com>.
+1
All Futon tests and make check passes on:
AMD64, Ubuntu 9.10/10.4 hybrid (64-bit), Erlang R13B01,
xulrunner 1.9.1.9, FF 3.6.3
AMD64, Ubuntu 10.4 (32-bit), Erlang R13B03,
xulrunner 1.9.2.6, FF 3.6.3
AMD64, Debian testing (64-bit), Erlang R13B04,
libmozjs-dev 1.9.1.9, Iceweasel 3.5.9
Cheers,
Volker
On 09.07.2010 18:55, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Adam Kocoloski <ko...@apache.org>.
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
Sneaking my +1 in before the vote is called. :)
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Robert Newson <ro...@gmail.com>.
+1
checksums match
make distcheck and Futon test suite passes.
OS X 10.6.4
Erlang R13B04
view compaction works.
B.
On Fri, Jul 9, 2010 at 5:23 PM, Damien Katz <da...@apache.org> wrote:
> +1, exact same setup.
>
> -Damien
>
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:18 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
>
>> +1
>>
>> all test pass
>> make check passes
>>
>> OSX Snow Leopard
>> Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false]
>>
>> Chris
>>
>> On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>>
>>> Hello,
>>>
>>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>>>
>>> Changes in this round:
>>>
>>> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>>>
>>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
>>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
>>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>>>
>>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>>
>>> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>>>
>>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>>>
>>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>>>
>>> Happy voting,
>>>
>>> N
>>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Damien Katz <da...@apache.org>.
+1, exact same setup.
-Damien
On Jul 9, 2010, at 3:18 PM, J Chris Anderson wrote:
> +1
>
> all test pass
> make check passes
>
> OSX Snow Leopard
> Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false]
>
> Chris
>
> On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>>
>> Changes in this round:
>>
>> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>>
>> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
>> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
>> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>>
>> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>>
>> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>>
>> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>>
>> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>>
>> Happy voting,
>>
>> N
>
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by J Chris Anderson <jc...@apache.org>.
+1
all test pass
make check passes
OSX Snow Leopard
Erlang R13B03 (erts-5.7.4) [source] [64-bit] [smp:2:2] [rq:2] [async-threads:0] [kernel-poll:false]
Chris
On Jul 9, 2010, at 9:55 AM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N
Re: [VOTE] Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round
Posted by Robert Dionne <di...@dionne-associates.com>.
+1
OS X 10.6
Erlang R13B04
Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; U; Intel Mac OS X 10.6; en-US; rv:1.9.1.10) Gecko/20100504 Firefox/3.5.10
make distcheck is ok
all Futon test pass. Note: my Firefox is slightly below Sebastian's
all tests pass in ./test/javascript/run *except*
not ok 25 form_submit false
not ok 43 replication ReferenceError: $ is not defined
On Jul 9, 2010, at 12:55 PM, Noah Slater wrote:
> Hello,
>
> I would like call a vote for the Apache CouchDB 1.0.0 release, second round.
>
> Changes in this round:
>
> * Fixed various leftovers from internal refactoring
>
> We encourage the whole community to download and test these release artifacts so
> that any critical issues can be resolved before the release is made. Everyone is
> free to vote on this release, so get stuck in!
>
> We are voting on the following release artifacts:
>
> http://people.apache.org/~nslater/dist/1.0.0/
>
> These artifacts have been built from the 1.0.0 tag in Subversion:
>
> http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/couchdb/tags/1.0.0/
>
> Happy voting,
>
> N