[jira] [Commented] (UIMA-5362) Ruta: accumulative ticket for fixing flaws listed in 2.6.0 rc1 review

["Peter Klügl (JIRA)" <de...@uima.apache.org>]

    [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5362?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel&focusedCommentId=15974212#comment-15974212 ] 

Peter Klügl commented on UIMA-5362:
-----------------------------------

The name of the update site origins in the subsite, not in the currently build site.

> Ruta: accumulative ticket for fixing flaws listed in 2.6.0 rc1 review
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: UIMA-5362
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/UIMA-5362
>             Project: UIMA
>          Issue Type: Task
>          Components: Ruta
>    Affects Versions: 2.6.0ruta
>            Reporter: Peter Klügl
>            Assignee: Peter Klügl
>             Fix For: 2.6.1ruta
>
>
> Ruta: accumulative ticket for fixing flaws listed in 2.6.0 rc1 review
> Reported by Richard:
> Compared tag with source: OK
> Checking POMs: OK
> - I don't understand why you exclude UIMAJ-Core classes in the "enforce-compatibility" profile of Ruta. Shouldn't semver be removed after switching to japicmp?
> POM check yields no changes in dependencies, skipping re-check of licenses.
> Build on OS X: OK
> Spot check signatures: OK ( and I actually have Peter's key in my keyring  ) 
> Install from Update Site into Eclipse: OK
> - Update site identifies itself as "file:/D:/work/ruta/ruta-eclipse-update-site/target/eclipse-update-site/ruta" - A proper name would be better
> - Before being able to install Ruta, I also need to add the normal UIMA update site. I though that update sites can refer to each other?
> Code breaks out of boxes in PDF documentation on page 26.
> Indentation depth in code examples in the documentation is not always the same.



--
This message was sent by Atlassian JIRA
(v6.3.15#6346)