[POLL] Buildr 1.3.3 release

[Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com>]

We went on code freeze six days ago, few minor issues discovered and fixed,
tests all green now. I think that by tomorrow, we can declare trunk stable
enough and start a formal vote on the release.  It's going to take a couple
of hours to stage the packagers, prepare a vote email etc, so I'd like to
know if it's worth pursuing first.
Assaf

Re: [POLL] Buildr 1.3.3 release

[lacton <la...@users.sourceforge.net>]

+1

On Tue, Oct 7, 2008 at 10:28 PM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote:
> We went on code freeze six days ago, few minor issues discovered and fixed,
> tests all green now. I think that by tomorrow, we can declare trunk stable
> enough and start a formal vote on the release.  It's going to take a couple
> of hours to stage the packagers, prepare a vote email etc, so I'd like to
> know if it's worth pursuing first.
> Assaf

Re: [POLL] Buildr 1.3.3 release

[Tal Rotbart <re...@gmail.com>]

+1

On Wed, Oct 8, 2008 at 7:28 AM, Assaf Arkin <ar...@intalio.com> wrote:
> We went on code freeze six days ago, few minor issues discovered and fixed,
> tests all green now. I think that by tomorrow, we can declare trunk stable
> enough and start a formal vote on the release.  It's going to take a couple
> of hours to stage the packagers, prepare a vote email etc, so I'd like to
> know if it's worth pursuing first.
> Assaf
>

Re: [POLL] Buildr 1.3.3 release

[Jim Jagielski <ji...@jaguNET.com>]

+1

On Oct 7, 2008, at 4:28 PM, Assaf Arkin wrote:

> We went on code freeze six days ago, few minor issues discovered and  
> fixed,
> tests all green now. I think that by tomorrow, we can declare trunk  
> stable
> enough and start a formal vote on the release.  It's going to take a  
> couple
> of hours to stage the packagers, prepare a vote email etc, so I'd  
> like to
> know if it's worth pursuing first.
> Assaf