You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to notifications@ant.apache.org by "Maarten Coene (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2010/06/15 00:30:13 UTC

[jira] Updated: (IVY-736) makepom ignores artifact type in ivy.xml and hardcodes 'jar' in the output pom

     [ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-736?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]

Maarten Coene updated IVY-736:
------------------------------

    Component/s: Maven Compatibility

> makepom ignores artifact type in ivy.xml and hardcodes 'jar' in the output pom
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
>
>                 Key: IVY-736
>                 URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/IVY-736
>             Project: Ivy
>          Issue Type: Bug
>          Components: Ant, Maven Compatibility
>    Affects Versions: 2.0.0-beta-1
>         Environment: Windows XP, Java 5
>            Reporter: Carlton Brown
>            Assignee: Maarten Coene
>            Priority: Minor
>             Fix For: 2.2.0-RC1
>
>         Attachments: apache-ivy-2.1.0.src.java.org.apache.ivy.plugins.parser.m2.PomModuleDescriptorWriter.java.patch
>
>
> I'm using <ivy:makepom> to generate pom files for a tarfile.  Even though ivy.xml declares the package type as 'tar', the makepom task sets the packaging type to 'jar':
> Input ivy.xml file fragment:
>     <info organisation="myorg" module="hello-package" revision="1.0"/>
>     <publications>
>       <artifact name="hello-package" type="tar" ext="tar"/>
>       <artifact name="hello-package" type="pom" ext="pom"/>
>     </publications>
>  Output pom file fragment:
>   <groupId>myorg</groupId>
>   <artifactId>hello-package</artifactId>
>   <packaging>jar</packaging>
>   <version>1.0</version>
> Upon looking in the Ivy source, I found that the value is hardcoded in the method printModuleId in org.apache.ivy.plugins.parser.m2.PomModuleDescriptorWriter class:
> out.println("  <packaging>jar</packaging>"); 
> I did not see any easy way to fix this because it does not look like the type attribute is part of the module framework.

-- 
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.