You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@bval.apache.org by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> on 2011/02/04 05:02:38 UTC
[VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
the following artifacts up for a vote:
SVN source tag (r1067061):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
Maven staging repo:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
Source release:
https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
Javadoc staging site:
http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
Vote will be open for 72 hours.
[ ] +1 approve
[ ] +0 no opinion
[ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
Thanks,
Donald
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Here's my +1
Signature/checksum of source release are good. Source looks fine. Generated jars look good. One minor issue:
The year in the base NOTICE file -- https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/NOTICE -- is 2010. Notice files in generated jars all contain 2011. This isn't a big issue, but should be updated in the future. Not enough for a respin, IMO.
--kevan
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>.
actually the changelog [1] doesn't show that many other new/fixed parts.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/14 Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>
> I think we should continue the vote.
> We can still discuss how to treat logging in the future for the next
> release.
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Mon, 2/14/11, Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> > From: Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>
> > Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> > To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> > Date: Monday, February 14, 2011, 8:15 PM
> > hi kevan,
> >
> > see the objections mentioned by mark.
> >
> > regards,
> > gerhard
> >
> > http://www.irian.at
> >
> > Your JSF powerhouse -
> > JSF Consulting, Development and
> > Courses in English and German
> >
> > Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
> >
> >
> >
> > 2011/2/14 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> >
> > >
> > > On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > >
> > > > There have been objections. Mainly that a small
> > lib like bval shouldnt
> > > bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is
> > not as good as other
> > > logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into
> > just another logging
> > > framework deathmatch...
> > > >
> > > > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to
> > year, there is hardly a
> > > technical argument why one should not use it today.
> > >
> > > I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I
> > would call "objections".
> > > Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are
> > objections, let's get
> > > them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the
> > vote along.
> > >
> > > --kevan
> >
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
I think we should continue the vote.
We can still discuss how to treat logging in the future for the next release.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Mon, 2/14/11, Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Monday, February 14, 2011, 8:15 PM
> hi kevan,
>
> see the objections mentioned by mark.
>
> regards,
> gerhard
>
> http://www.irian.at
>
> Your JSF powerhouse -
> JSF Consulting, Development and
> Courses in English and German
>
> Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
>
>
>
> 2011/2/14 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> >
> > On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> >
> > > There have been objections. Mainly that a small
> lib like bval shouldnt
> > bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is
> not as good as other
> > logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into
> just another logging
> > framework deathmatch...
> > >
> > > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to
> year, there is hardly a
> > technical argument why one should not use it today.
> >
> > I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I
> would call "objections".
> > Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are
> objections, let's get
> > them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the
> vote along.
> >
> > --kevan
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Gerhard <ge...@gmail.com>.
hi kevan,
see the objections mentioned by mark.
regards,
gerhard
http://www.irian.at
Your JSF powerhouse -
JSF Consulting, Development and
Courses in English and German
Professional Support for Apache MyFaces
2011/2/14 Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
>
> On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
>
> > There have been objections. Mainly that a small lib like bval shouldnt
> bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is not as good as other
> logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into just another logging
> framework deathmatch...
> >
> > And as tooling for jul gets better from year to year, there is hardly a
> technical argument why one should not use it today.
>
> I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I would call "objections".
> Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are objections, let's get
> them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the vote along.
>
> --kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 9, 2011, at 2:15 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> There have been objections. Mainly that a small lib like bval shouldnt bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is not as good as other logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into just another logging framework deathmatch...
>
> And as tooling for jul gets better from year to year, there is hardly a technical argument why one should not use it today.
I scanned the list. Can't say that I found what I would call "objections". Seemed more like ambivalence. Anyway, if there are objections, let's get them resolved. If there aren't, then let's move the vote along.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
There have been objections. Mainly that a small lib like bval shouldnt bring its own log layer along. java.util.logging is not as good as other logging frameworks, but it doesn't force the user into just another logging framework deathmatch...
And as tooling for jul gets better from year to year, there is hardly a technical argument why one should not use it today.
LieGrue
strub
--- On Wed, 2/9/11, Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Wednesday, February 9, 2011, 2:33 AM
>
> On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
>
> > -0
> > reason: the discussion about using slf4j just stopped
> and we didn't decide
> > it unanimously (and there was also no official
> majority vote).
>
> Hi Gerhard,
> Were there objections raised regarding slf4j? I recall some
> discussions, but don't recall any major objections. If there
> weren't objections raised, then why would there be reason
> for a vote?
>
> > in case of an >explicit< discussion about such a
> basic topic (which results
> > in a new dependency) it feels wrong to me to just
> committing it (including
> > some comments in the jira issue).
>
> I'm not sure I understand you correctly. If you are saying
> that Jira is not the appropriate location for community
> "discussions", then I would agree with you. It's not
> uncommon, however, especially in new communities. Certainly
> a good reminder -- don't treat Jira as a discussion forum.
>
> --kevan
____________________________________________________________________________________
Expecting? Get great news right away with email Auto-Check.
Try the Yahoo! Mail Beta.
http://advision.webevents.yahoo.com/mailbeta/newmail_tools.html
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
On Feb 8, 2011, at 11:54 AM, Gerhard Petracek wrote:
> -0
> reason: the discussion about using slf4j just stopped and we didn't decide
> it unanimously (and there was also no official majority vote).
Hi Gerhard,
Were there objections raised regarding slf4j? I recall some discussions, but don't recall any major objections. If there weren't objections raised, then why would there be reason for a vote?
> in case of an >explicit< discussion about such a basic topic (which results
> in a new dependency) it feels wrong to me to just committing it (including
> some comments in the jira issue).
I'm not sure I understand you correctly. If you are saying that Jira is not the appropriate location for community "discussions", then I would agree with you. It's not uncommon, however, especially in new communities. Certainly a good reminder -- don't treat Jira as a discussion forum.
--kevan
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Gerhard Petracek <gp...@apache.org>.
-0
reason: the discussion about using slf4j just stopped and we didn't decide
it unanimously (and there was also no official majority vote).
in case of an >explicit< discussion about such a basic topic (which results
in a new dependency) it feels wrong to me to just committing it (including
some comments in the jira issue).
regards,
gerhard
2011/2/8 Jeremy Bauer <te...@gmail.com>
> +1
>
> Thanks, Donald!
>
> -Jeremy
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
> > A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> > the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > SVN source tag (r1067061):
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
> >
> > Source release:
> >
> >
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
> >
> > Javadoc staging site:
> >
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
> >
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Donald
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Jeremy Bauer <te...@gmail.com>.
+1
Thanks, Donald!
-Jeremy
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
usually incubation projects don't do maintenance branches.
We should rather try to graduate before that.
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Tue, 2/8/11, Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com> wrote:
> From: Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Tuesday, February 8, 2011, 3:56 PM
> +1
>
> Will we create a branch for he 0.3-incubating for future
> maintenance, assume
> there is a need for it?
>
> On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> wrote:
>
> > A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has
> been created with
> > the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >
> > SVN source tag (r1067061):
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
> >
> > Maven staging repo:
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
> >
> > Source release:
> >
> > https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
> >
> > Javadoc staging site:
> > http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
> >
> > PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
> >
> >
> > Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >
> > [ ] +1 approve
> > [ ] +0 no opinion
> > [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > Donald
> >
>
>
>
> --
> Albert Lee.
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Albert Lee <al...@gmail.com>.
+1
Will we create a branch for he 0.3-incubating for future maintenance, assume
there is a need for it?
On Thu, Feb 3, 2011 at 10:02 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
>
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
--
Albert Lee.
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Donald,
Can you either cancel or call this vote?
--kevan
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
Re: [RESULT] [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
On Sun, Apr 3, 2011 at 12:35 PM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Vote passed with the following:
> +1 Donald Woods, Mark Struberg, Kevan Miller, Niall Pemberton,
> Albert Lee, Jeremy Bauer,
> 0 Gerhard Petracek
> There were no -1 votes.
>
> Following +1 votes were from IPMC members:
> Donald Woods, Mark Struberg, Kevan Miller, Niall Pemberton
>
>
> For the IPMC, please review and I'll conclude the vote after the 72 hour
> review period.
Donald,
You need to post the vote on general@incubator
Niall
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
>
> On 2/3/11 11:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
>> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
>> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> SVN source tag (r1067061):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>>
>> Source release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>>
>> Javadoc staging site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>>
>
[RESULT] [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Vote passed with the following:
+1 Donald Woods, Mark Struberg, Kevan Miller, Niall Pemberton,
Albert Lee, Jeremy Bauer,
0 Gerhard Petracek
There were no -1 votes.
Following +1 votes were from IPMC members:
Donald Woods, Mark Struberg, Kevan Miller, Niall Pemberton
For the IPMC, please review and I'll conclude the vote after the 72 hour
review period.
Thanks,
Donald
On 2/3/11 11:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Niall Pemberton <ni...@gmail.com>.
+1
Niall
On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 4:02 AM, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Kevan Miller <ke...@gmail.com>.
Ping?
--kevan
On Feb 3, 2011, at 11:02 PM, Donald Woods wrote:
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
+1
gpg ok, rat ok, source release.zip ok, builds fine.
LieGrue,
strub
PS: I'd wished a bit more public discussion about introducing slf4j, but might have been my fault to not seeing it in jira...
--- On Fri, 2/4/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 4, 2011, 4:02 AM
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
ah kk, then I'll verify the build tonight - txs!
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 2/4/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> Subject: Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 4, 2011, 7:13 PM
> Those fail intermittently.
> Haven't had a chance to look since trunk is
> now 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT.
>
> -Donald
>
>
> On 2/4/11 6:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> > hmm, should it concern me that the tck hudson job
> fails? ;)
> >
> > LieGrue,
> > strub
> >
> > --- On Fri, 2/4/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> wrote:
> >
> >> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> >> Subject: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation
> 0.3-incubating
> >> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> >> Date: Friday, February 4, 2011, 4:02 AM
> >> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> >> release candidate has been created with
> >> the following artifacts up for a vote:
> >>
> >> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
> >>
> >> Maven staging repo:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
> >>
> >> Source release:
> >> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
> >>
> >> Javadoc staging site:
> >> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
> >>
> >> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> >> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
> >>
> >>
> >> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
> >>
> >> [ ] +1 approve
> >> [ ] +0 no opinion
> >> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
> >>
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Donald
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> >
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>.
Those fail intermittently. Haven't had a chance to look since trunk is
now 0.4-incubating-SNAPSHOT.
-Donald
On 2/4/11 6:08 AM, Mark Struberg wrote:
> hmm, should it concern me that the tck hudson job fails? ;)
>
> LieGrue,
> strub
>
> --- On Fri, 2/4/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
>
>> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
>> Subject: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
>> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
>> Date: Friday, February 4, 2011, 4:02 AM
>> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
>> release candidate has been created with
>> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>>
>> SVN source tag (r1067061):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>>
>> Maven staging repo:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>>
>> Source release:
>> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>>
>> Javadoc staging site:
>> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>>
>> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
>> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>>
>>
>> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>>
>> [ ] +1 approve
>> [ ] +0 no opinion
>> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>>
>>
>> Thanks,
>> Donald
>>
>
>
>
>
Re: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
Posted by Mark Struberg <st...@yahoo.de>.
hmm, should it concern me that the tck hudson job fails? ;)
LieGrue,
strub
--- On Fri, 2/4/11, Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org> wrote:
> From: Donald Woods <dw...@apache.org>
> Subject: [VOTE] Release Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> To: bval-dev@incubator.apache.org
> Date: Friday, February 4, 2011, 4:02 AM
> A Bean Validation 0.3-incubating
> release candidate has been created with
> the following artifacts up for a vote:
>
> SVN source tag (r1067061):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/tags/0.3-incubating/
>
> Maven staging repo:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/
>
> Source release:
> https://repository.apache.org/content/repositories/orgapachebval-033/org/apache/bval/bval-parent/0.3-incubating/bval-parent-0.3-incubating-source-release.zip
>
> Javadoc staging site:
> http://people.apache.org/~dwoods/bval/0.3-incubating/staging-site/apidocs/
>
> PGP release keys (signed using D018E6B1):
> https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/bval/KEYS
>
>
> Vote will be open for 72 hours.
>
> [ ] +1 approve
> [ ] +0 no opinion
> [ ] -1 disapprove (and reason why)
>
>
> Thanks,
> Donald
>