You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> on 2015/04/08 00:24:00 UTC
[VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
The artifacts can be downloaded from:
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
LUCENE-6403
https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
should one be needed.
Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
Best regards,
Tim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Steve Rowe <sa...@gmail.com>.
+1
SUCCESS! [1:35:41.271816]
Steve
> On Apr 7, 2015, at 6:27 PM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I forgot to paste in my smoke tester command ;-)
>
> python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632/
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>> LUCENE-6403
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>
>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>> should one be needed.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>
>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tim
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.
I forgot to paste in my smoke tester command ;-)
python3 -u dev-tools/scripts/smokeTestRelease.py
https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632/
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 4:24 PM, Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
> LUCENE-6403
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>
> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
> should one be needed.
>
> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>
> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>
> Best regards,
> Tim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Alan Woodward <al...@flax.co.uk>.
I'd like to get a change to SOLR-1387 in (just making a possibly-underperformant helper method private, something that Mike flagged). Sorry for not getting this in before the RC was cut, have been away from a computer for a couple of weeks.
Alan Woodward
www.flax.co.uk
On 7 Apr 2015, at 23:24, Timothy Potter wrote:
> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
> LUCENE-6403
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>
> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
> should one be needed.
>
> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>
> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>
> Best regards,
> Tim
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.
Hmmm ... 5.x nightly failed again ... this time it was
DistributedMLTComponentTest ... this test doesn't have anything to do
with the SocketProxy and partitions of the usual suspects ... passes
locally so the failure seems transient?
ant test -Dtestcase=DistributedMLTComponentTest -Dtests.method=test
-Dtests.seed=18D4ED128EC399FC -Dtests.multiplier=2
-Dtests.nightly=true -Dtests.slow=true
-Dtests.linedocsfile=/home/jenkins/lucene-data/enwiki.random.lines.txt
-Dtests.locale=uk_UA -Dtests.timezone=Etc/GMT-2 -Dtests.asserts=true
-Dtests.file.encoding=US-ASCII
So do I do another RC or should we wait until we have a passing build
for 5.1 on Jenkins?
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:00 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> To clarify, two JIRA issues, but one commit. As to why the bug became
> consistent on 5x, it seems other changes that were backported made this
> issue much more prominent. Normally, you might say, well a bug fix didn't
> make the release, it has not come back from 6x to 5x yet, but in this case,
> other changes exasperated that bug and these nightly fails were not picked
> up on (probably because there are so many non nightly fails consistently -
> another problem altogether).
>
> - Mark
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Those JIRA issues were still open - sometimes you put them in trunk for a
>> while and if all goes well you back port them a while later. I just have
>> been busy and lost track of them from last month to now.
>>
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM Michael McCandless
>> <lu...@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>> > I've resolved the hdfs failures on 5.1. There were two bug JIRA's that
>>> > were
>>> > in 6x but not yet 5x or 5.1.
>>>
>>> Hmm how/why did this happen? When we fix bugs on trunk we should
>>> always backport to 5.x, in general? Is there something we can learn
>>> here...?
>>>
>>> Mike McCandless
>>>
>>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
To clarify, two JIRA issues, but one commit. As to why the bug became
consistent on 5x, it seems other changes that were backported made this
issue much more prominent. Normally, you might say, well a bug fix didn't
make the release, it has not come back from 6x to 5x yet, but in this case,
other changes exasperated that bug and these nightly fails were not picked
up on (probably because there are so many non nightly fails consistently -
another problem altogether).
- Mark
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:45 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Those JIRA issues were still open - sometimes you put them in trunk for a
> while and if all goes well you back port them a while later. I just have
> been busy and lost track of them from last month to now.
>
>
> - Mark
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM Michael McCandless <
> lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > I've resolved the hdfs failures on 5.1. There were two bug JIRA's that
>> were
>> > in 6x but not yet 5x or 5.1.
>>
>> Hmm how/why did this happen? When we fix bugs on trunk we should
>> always backport to 5.x, in general? Is there something we can learn
>> here...?
>>
>> Mike McCandless
>>
>> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
Those JIRA issues were still open - sometimes you put them in trunk for a
while and if all goes well you back port them a while later. I just have
been busy and lost track of them from last month to now.
- Mark
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 12:03 PM Michael McCandless <
lucene@mikemccandless.com> wrote:
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > I've resolved the hdfs failures on 5.1. There were two bug JIRA's that
> were
> > in 6x but not yet 5x or 5.1.
>
> Hmm how/why did this happen? When we fix bugs on trunk we should
> always backport to 5.x, in general? Is there something we can learn
> here...?
>
> Mike McCandless
>
> http://blog.mikemccandless.com
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Michael McCandless <lu...@mikemccandless.com>.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:50 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've resolved the hdfs failures on 5.1. There were two bug JIRA's that were
> in 6x but not yet 5x or 5.1.
Hmm how/why did this happen? When we fix bugs on trunk we should
always backport to 5.x, in general? Is there something we can learn
here...?
Mike McCandless
http://blog.mikemccandless.com
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
I've resolved the hdfs failures on 5.1. There were two bug JIRA's that were
in 6x but not yet 5x or 5.1.
- Mark
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 11:37 AM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think I have the 3 usual suspects Robert mentioned addressed for
> now. ReplicationFactorTest continues to be a problem and is thus
> annotated with BadApple. The other two stopped failing when I
> increased the socket timeout setting the SocketProxy from 10 to 100
> seconds.
>
> Tim
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > Sorry - what I meant was, I think that is only in 5.2 and 6x. Indeed,
> > SOLR-7364 is new and not in 5.1.
> >
> > I've moved to testing the 5.1 branch. It has separate fails that I'd been
> > seeing on my local jenkins machine.
> >
> > I've filed SOLR-7365 to address that as a blocker issue.
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> >
> > On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:53 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Hmm...that issue may only be in 6x. I was seeing 5x fails though. I'll
> >> check that next.
> >>
> >> - Mark
> >>
> >>
> >> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> I've filed SOLR-7364.
> >>>
> >>> - Mark
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
> >>>> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
> >>>> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>> - Mark
> >>>>
> >>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
> >>>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
> >>>>>
> >>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
> >>>>>
> >>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
> >>>>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
> >>>>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
> >>>>> LUCENE-6403
> >>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's
> recent
> >>>>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
> >>>>> should one be needed.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Best regards,
> >>>>> Tim
> >>>>>
> >>>>> ------------------------------------------------------------
> ---------
> >>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>>>>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>.
I think I have the 3 usual suspects Robert mentioned addressed for
now. ReplicationFactorTest continues to be a problem and is thus
annotated with BadApple. The other two stopped failing when I
increased the socket timeout setting the SocketProxy from 10 to 100
seconds.
Tim
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 9:17 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Sorry - what I meant was, I think that is only in 5.2 and 6x. Indeed,
> SOLR-7364 is new and not in 5.1.
>
> I've moved to testing the 5.1 branch. It has separate fails that I'd been
> seeing on my local jenkins machine.
>
> I've filed SOLR-7365 to address that as a blocker issue.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:53 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Hmm...that issue may only be in 6x. I was seeing 5x fails though. I'll
>> check that next.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>>
>> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>
>>> I've filed SOLR-7364.
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>>>
>>>> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
>>>> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
>>>> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>>>>
>>>>
>>>> - Mark
>>>>
>>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
>>>> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>>>>
>>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>>>
>>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>>>>
>>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>>
>>>>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>>>>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>>>>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>>>>> LUCENE-6403
>>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>>>>
>>>>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>>>>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>>>>> should one be needed.
>>>>>
>>>>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>>>>
>>>>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>>>>
>>>>> Best regards,
>>>>> Tim
>>>>>
>>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
Sorry - what I meant was, I think that is only in 5.2 and 6x. Indeed,
SOLR-7364 is new and not in 5.1.
I've moved to testing the 5.1 branch. It has separate fails that I'd been
seeing on my local jenkins machine.
I've filed SOLR-7365 to address that as a blocker issue.
- Mark
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:53 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hmm...that issue may only be in 6x. I was seeing 5x fails though. I'll
> check that next.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've filed SOLR-7364.
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>>> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
>>> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
>>> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>>>
>>>
>>> - Mark
>>>
>>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
>>> wrote:
>>>
>>>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>>>
>>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
>>>> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>>>
>>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>>
>>>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>>>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>>>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>>>> LUCENE-6403
>>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>>>
>>>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>>>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>>>> should one be needed.
>>>>
>>>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>>>
>>>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>>>
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Tim
>>>>
>>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>>
>>>>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
Hmm...that issue may only be in 6x. I was seeing 5x fails though. I'll
check that next.
- Mark
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:44 AM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've filed SOLR-7364.
>
> - Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
>> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
>> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>>
>>
>> - Mark
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>
>>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>>
>>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
>>> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>>
>>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>>
>>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>>> LUCENE-6403
>>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>>
>>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>>> should one be needed.
>>>
>>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>>
>>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>>
>>> Best regards,
>>> Tim
>>>
>>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>>
>>>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
I've filed SOLR-7364.
- Mark
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:27 PM Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>
>
> - Mark
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
>
>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
>> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>> LUCENE-6403
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>
>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>> should one be needed.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>
>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Yonik Seeley <ys...@gmail.com>.
On Wed, Apr 8, 2015 at 10:47 AM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I think tests like this should get a JIRA issue and a @BadApple.
And should automatically become release blockers, unless someone
analyzes the failure reasons and explains why it's still OK to
release.
-Yonik
> - Mark
>
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:14 PM Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> I sent a previous message about nightly problems.
>>
>> nightly is running against 5.x (only), but looks like nightly and
>> clover coverage has not passed in a while. We can't even get a code
>> coverage report any time from 2015. The majority of failures seem to
>> be the same 3 tests. Maybe we should disable those 3 and see if we can
>> stabilize the builds?
>>
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/
>> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Lucene-Solr-Clover-5.x/
>>
>> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
>> > currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
>> > release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>> >
>> > - Mark
>> >
>> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
>> > wrote:
>> >>
>> >> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>> >>
>> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>> >>
>> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>> >>
>> >> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>> >> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>> >> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>> >> LUCENE-6403
>> >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>> >>
>> >> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>> >> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>> >> should one be needed.
>> >>
>> >> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>> >>
>> >> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>> >>
>> >> Best regards,
>> >> Tim
>> >>
>> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>> >>
>> >
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
I think tests like this should get a JIRA issue and a @BadApple.
- Mark
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 8:14 PM Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I sent a previous message about nightly problems.
>
> nightly is running against 5.x (only), but looks like nightly and
> clover coverage has not passed in a while. We can't even get a code
> coverage report any time from 2015. The majority of failures seem to
> be the same 3 tests. Maybe we should disable those 3 and see if we can
> stabilize the builds?
>
> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/
> https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Lucene-Solr-Clover-5.x/
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> > I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
> > currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
> > release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
> >
> > - Mark
> >
> > On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >>
> >> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
> >>
> >> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> >>
> >> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
> >>
> >> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
> >>
> >> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
> >> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
> >> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
> >> LUCENE-6403
> >> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
> >>
> >> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
> >> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
> >> should one be needed.
> >>
> >> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
> >>
> >> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
> >>
> >> Best regards,
> >> Tim
> >>
> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> >> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
> >>
> >
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Robert Muir <rc...@gmail.com>.
I sent a previous message about nightly problems.
nightly is running against 5.x (only), but looks like nightly and
clover coverage has not passed in a while. We can't even get a code
coverage report any time from 2015. The majority of failures seem to
be the same 3 tests. Maybe we should disable those 3 and see if we can
stabilize the builds?
https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Lucene-Solr-NightlyTests-5.x/
https://builds.apache.org/view/All/job/Lucene-Solr-Clover-5.x/
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:28 PM, Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
> currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
> release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
>
> - Mark
>
> On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
>>
>> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>>
>> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
>>
>> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>>
>> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>>
>> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
>> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
>> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
>> LUCENE-6403
>> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>>
>> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
>> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
>> should one be needed.
>>
>> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>>
>> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>>
>> Best regards,
>> Tim
>>
>> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
>> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>>
>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
Re: [VOTE] 5.1.0 RC1
Posted by Mark Miller <ma...@gmail.com>.
I've noticed that it looks like a bunch of the HDFS tests are failing
currently (most are set to nightly). I should look at this before we
release. I'll try and get to it shortly.
- Mark
On Tue, Apr 7, 2015 at 6:26 PM Timothy Potter <th...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Please vote for the first release candidate for Lucene/Solr 5.1.0
>
> The artifacts can be downloaded from:
> https://dist.apache.org/repos/dist/dev/lucene/lucene-solr-5.
> 1.0-RC1-rev1671632
>
> You can run the smoke tester directly with this command:
>
> NOTE: You'll need to pull the latest updates Steve Rowe made to the
> smoke tester script to work with the RC staged in subversion instead
> of on people.apache.org. Specifically, you need Steve's fix for:
> LUCENE-6403
> https://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=revision&revision=1671739
>
> Lastly, I built this RC yesterday, so it does not have Adrien's recent
> changes for LUCENE-6406. Those will be included in 5.2 or the next RC
> should one be needed.
>
> Thanks for your patience in waiting for me to get this out.
>
> Here's my +1 SUCCESS! [0:45:16.075315]
>
> Best regards,
> Tim
>
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@lucene.apache.org
>
>