You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@cloudstack.apache.org by Harikrishna Patnala <ha...@citrix.com> on 2014/05/27 13:02:56 UTC
Re: Review Request 21924: [Automation] Disabling the failed test cases in
XenServer and KVM runs
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/
-----------------------------------------------------------
(Updated May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m.)
Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Santhosh Edukulla.
Summary (updated)
-----------------
[Automation] Disabling the failed test cases in XenServer and KVM runs
Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6768, CLOUDSTACK-6769, CLOUDSTACK-6770, CLOUDSTACK-6773, CLOUDSTACK-6774, CLOUDSTACK-6776, and CLOUDSTACK-6777
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6768
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6769
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6770
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6773
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6774
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6776
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6777
Repository: cloudstack-git
Description (updated)
-------
[Automation] Disabling the failed test cases mentioned in the following tickets
[Automation] [Xenserver]
1) integration.smoke.test_scale_vm - CLOUDSTACK-6768
2) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6769
3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
4) integration.smoke.test_secondary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6773
[Automation][KVM]
1) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6774
2) integration.smoke.test_non_contigiousvlan - CLOUDSTACK-6776
3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
4) test_secondary_storage – CLOUDSTACK-6777
Diffs (updated)
-----
test/integration/smoke/test_iso.py 5821ec7
test/integration/smoke/test_non_contigiousvlan.py a84e62f
test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py 3147d86
test/integration/smoke/test_scale_vm.py f0ec534
test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py 90304b3
Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/diff/
Testing
-------
Thanks,
Harikrishna Patnala
Re: Review Request 21924: [Automation] Disabling the failed test cases in
XenServer and KVM runs
Posted by Abhinandan Prateek <ap...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/#review43966
-----------------------------------------------------------
Ship it!
Ship It!
- Abhinandan Prateek
On May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Santhosh Edukulla.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6768, CLOUDSTACK-6769, CLOUDSTACK-6770, CLOUDSTACK-6773, CLOUDSTACK-6774, CLOUDSTACK-6776, and CLOUDSTACK-6777
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6768
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6769
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6770
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6773
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6774
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6776
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6777
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> [Automation] Disabling the failed test cases mentioned in the following tickets
>
> [Automation] [Xenserver]
> 1) integration.smoke.test_scale_vm - CLOUDSTACK-6768
>
> 2) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6769
>
> 3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
>
> 4) integration.smoke.test_secondary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6773
>
> [Automation][KVM]
> 1) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6774
>
> 2) integration.smoke.test_non_contigiousvlan - CLOUDSTACK-6776
>
> 3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
>
> 4) test_secondary_storage – CLOUDSTACK-6777
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> test/integration/smoke/test_iso.py 5821ec7
> test/integration/smoke/test_non_contigiousvlan.py a84e62f
> test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py 3147d86
> test/integration/smoke/test_scale_vm.py f0ec534
> test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py 90304b3
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harikrishna Patnala
>
>
Re: Review Request 21924: [Automation] Disabling the failed test
cases in XenServer and KVM runs
Posted by Rohit Yadav <bh...@apache.org>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/#review64032
-----------------------------------------------------------
Is this already merged or requires additions? Please close if already merged.
- Rohit Yadav
On May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Santhosh Edukulla.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6768, CLOUDSTACK-6769, CLOUDSTACK-6770, CLOUDSTACK-6773, CLOUDSTACK-6774, CLOUDSTACK-6776, and CLOUDSTACK-6777
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6768
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6769
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6770
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6773
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6774
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6776
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6777
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> [Automation] Disabling the failed test cases mentioned in the following tickets
>
> [Automation] [Xenserver]
> 1) integration.smoke.test_scale_vm - CLOUDSTACK-6768
>
> 2) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6769
>
> 3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
>
> 4) integration.smoke.test_secondary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6773
>
> [Automation][KVM]
> 1) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6774
>
> 2) integration.smoke.test_non_contigiousvlan - CLOUDSTACK-6776
>
> 3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
>
> 4) test_secondary_storage – CLOUDSTACK-6777
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> test/integration/smoke/test_iso.py 5821ec7
> test/integration/smoke/test_non_contigiousvlan.py a84e62f
> test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py 3147d86
> test/integration/smoke/test_scale_vm.py f0ec534
> test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py 90304b3
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harikrishna Patnala
>
>
Re: Review Request 21924: [Automation] Disabling the failed test
cases in XenServer and KVM runs
Posted by Sebastien Goasguen <ru...@gmail.com>.
-----------------------------------------------------------
This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/#review78996
-----------------------------------------------------------
Thank you for submitting your CloudStack contribution through review board. After discussion on the dev@cloudstack.apache.org the community decided to close down review board and start accepting contributiong through GitHub pull requests. We have been using GH PR for several months now and the process is better than review board.
We will keep Review Board open for another week to give you time to migrate your patch to a github PR if you wish. After that time, your patch will no longer be viewable (even though it will not be deleted).
Please consider submitting a pull request.
Great instructions are available at:
https://github.com/apache/cloudstack/blob/master/CONTRIBUTING.md
Thank you very much for your time and your contribution to Apache CloudStack, we hope that using this new process will encourage you to do more.
- Sebastien Goasguen
On May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m., Harikrishna Patnala wrote:
>
> -----------------------------------------------------------
> This is an automatically generated e-mail. To reply, visit:
> https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/
> -----------------------------------------------------------
>
> (Updated May 27, 2014, 11:02 a.m.)
>
>
> Review request for cloudstack, Koushik Das and Santhosh Edukulla.
>
>
> Bugs: CLOUDSTACK-6768, CLOUDSTACK-6769, CLOUDSTACK-6770, CLOUDSTACK-6773, CLOUDSTACK-6774, CLOUDSTACK-6776, and CLOUDSTACK-6777
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6768
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6769
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6770
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6773
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6774
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6776
> https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/CLOUDSTACK-6777
>
>
> Repository: cloudstack-git
>
>
> Description
> -------
>
> [Automation] Disabling the failed test cases mentioned in the following tickets
>
> [Automation] [Xenserver]
> 1) integration.smoke.test_scale_vm - CLOUDSTACK-6768
>
> 2) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6769
>
> 3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
>
> 4) integration.smoke.test_secondary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6773
>
> [Automation][KVM]
> 1) integration.smoke.test_iso - CLOUDSTACK-6774
>
> 2) integration.smoke.test_non_contigiousvlan - CLOUDSTACK-6776
>
> 3) integration.smoke.test_primary_storage - CLOUDSTACK-6770
>
> 4) test_secondary_storage – CLOUDSTACK-6777
>
>
> Diffs
> -----
>
> test/integration/smoke/test_iso.py 5821ec7
> test/integration/smoke/test_non_contigiousvlan.py a84e62f
> test/integration/smoke/test_primary_storage.py 3147d86
> test/integration/smoke/test_scale_vm.py f0ec534
> test/integration/smoke/test_secondary_storage.py 90304b3
>
> Diff: https://reviews.apache.org/r/21924/diff/
>
>
> Testing
> -------
>
>
> Thanks,
>
> Harikrishna Patnala
>
>