You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@geronimo.apache.org by Russell Collins <Ru...@mclaneat.com> on 2010/01/09 02:46:23 UTC
Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Please bear with me as this may be long. I am trying to be as thorough as possible. I have upgraded my development environment and projects to use Geronimo 2.2. I was able to successfully replace the 2.1 server with the 2.2 server in my development environment. Everything compiled and went smooth from that standpoint (Good job guys). When trying to run unit tests from an outside client, errors started to appear. This was to be expected because I was still using the openejb-client-3.0.1 assembly. When I updated the assembly to openejb-client-3.1.2, everything worked as expected (once again, great job). By updating this, I was certain that the Geronimo 2.2 tool was using the EJB 3.1 specification.
I then proceeded to try to use some of the new EJB 3.1 features. More specifically, the Singleton. I changed one of the annotations for my EJBs to Singleton and immediately got an error. I then checked the classpath to make sure I was pointing to the correct Geronimo installation. I was. In viewing the library assemblies in my project, I did not see anything that looked like a EJB 3.1 assembly underneath the Apache Geronimo 2.2 library. The only assembly that I found is titled: geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1.jar. I went to that assembly and opened up the jar file. I did see implementation classes for Stateful and Stateless but I did not see one for Singleton as I had expected. I do not know if this is a GEP issue or a Geronimo Server issue. In summary, it appears that the running server is using EJB 3.1 but when referencing the library during development time, it is only using the 3.0 specification. Can someone help me out with this?
Russell Collins
Sr. Software Engineer
McLane Advanced Technology
254.771.6419
"Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.
RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Posted by Russell Collins <Ru...@mclaneat.com>.
I stand corrected. There is an assembly that ships with Geronimo 2.2 that contains the various 3.1 classes including the Singleton. It is the ejb31-api-experimental-3.1.2.jar. The assembly works when I explicitly add a reference to it in my project. It does not work if I only have a reference to the server libraries. I do not know if that is intentional or not. The EAR file that I created does work when deployed to the server.
-----Original Message-----
From: Russell Collins [mailto:Russell.Collins@mclaneat.com]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 10:47 AM
To: 'user@geronimo.apache.org'
Subject: RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
My initial thought was that Geronimo 2.2 would be using OpenEJB 3.1.2. The server does contain 3.1.2 assemblies and my client assembly had to be upgraded to work with the new server. However, the EJB implementation assembly in Geronimo 2.2 does not have an implementation of the Singleton annotation. Someone please correct me but the EJB implementation in the Geronimo 2.2 server is called geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1.jar and does contain the classes for the Singleton. Interestingly enough, this is the same assembly in version 2.1.4 of Geronimo as well. Also note that I am successfully referencing the Geronimo server from within my application and build process. Referencing Geronimo 2.2 and all of the assemblies within the server will result in errors if I am trying to use the Singleton class.
-----Original Message-----
From: frapien [mailto:frank.pientka@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 1:35 AM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Geronimo 2.2 is using [GERONIMO-4693] OpenEJB 3.1.2, so
[GERONIMO-4918] - EJB 3.1 Singleton Support is in it.
please see http://openejb.apache.org/openejb-312.html
and try the OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin Alpha Release 1.0.0.alpha
http://blogs.apache.org/openejb/
which supports EJB 3.1 annotation
Regards
Frank
Russell Collins wrote:
>
> Thank you David. I was not aware that there would not be full ejb 3.1
> support with this release. Is there a list of ejb 3.1 features that are
> implemented? I do not believe singletons is one of them.
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Geronimo---EJB3.1---Eclipse-tp27084875s134p27106727.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.
RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Posted by Russell Collins <Ru...@mclaneat.com>.
My initial thought was that Geronimo 2.2 would be using OpenEJB 3.1.2. The server does contain 3.1.2 assemblies and my client assembly had to be upgraded to work with the new server. However, the EJB implementation assembly in Geronimo 2.2 does not have an implementation of the Singleton annotation. Someone please correct me but the EJB implementation in the Geronimo 2.2 server is called geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1.jar and does contain the classes for the Singleton. Interestingly enough, this is the same assembly in version 2.1.4 of Geronimo as well. Also note that I am successfully referencing the Geronimo server from within my application and build process. Referencing Geronimo 2.2 and all of the assemblies within the server will result in errors if I am trying to use the Singleton class.
-----Original Message-----
From: frapien [mailto:frank.pientka@gmx.de]
Sent: Monday, January 11, 2010 1:35 AM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Geronimo 2.2 is using [GERONIMO-4693] OpenEJB 3.1.2, so
[GERONIMO-4918] - EJB 3.1 Singleton Support is in it.
please see http://openejb.apache.org/openejb-312.html
and try the OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin Alpha Release 1.0.0.alpha
http://blogs.apache.org/openejb/
which supports EJB 3.1 annotation
Regards
Frank
Russell Collins wrote:
>
> Thank you David. I was not aware that there would not be full ejb 3.1
> support with this release. Is there a list of ejb 3.1 features that are
> implemented? I do not believe singletons is one of them.
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Geronimo---EJB3.1---Eclipse-tp27084875s134p27106727.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.
RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Posted by frapien <fr...@gmx.de>.
Geronimo 2.2 is using [GERONIMO-4693] OpenEJB 3.1.2, so
[GERONIMO-4918] - EJB 3.1 Singleton Support is in it.
please see http://openejb.apache.org/openejb-312.html
and try the OpenEJB Eclipse Plugin Alpha Release 1.0.0.alpha
http://blogs.apache.org/openejb/
which supports EJB 3.1 annotation
Regards
Frank
Russell Collins wrote:
>
> Thank you David. I was not aware that there would not be full ejb 3.1
> support with this release. Is there a list of ejb 3.1 features that are
> implemented? I do not believe singletons is one of them.
>
>
--
View this message in context: http://old.nabble.com/Geronimo---EJB3.1---Eclipse-tp27084875s134p27106727.html
Sent from the Apache Geronimo - Users mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
RE: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Posted by Russell Collins <Ru...@mclaneat.com>.
Thank you David. I was not aware that there would not be full ejb 3.1 support with this release. Is there a list of ejb 3.1 features that are implemented? I do not believe singletons is one of them.
From: David Jencks [mailto:david_jencks@yahoo.com]
Sent: Saturday, January 09, 2010 1:56 AM
To: user@geronimo.apache.org
Subject: Re: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
AFAIK geronimo 2.2 supports ejb 3.0, ejb 3.1 support is in progress for geronimo 3.0. I know there are some features already implemented, and I thought singletons were among the implemented features. However you shouldn't expect full ejb 3.1 compliance from geronimo 2.2.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 8, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Russell Collins wrote:
Please bear with me as this may be long. I am trying to be as thorough as possible. I have upgraded my development environment and projects to use Geronimo 2.2. I was able to successfully replace the 2.1 server with the 2.2 server in my development environment. Everything compiled and went smooth from that standpoint (Good job guys). When trying to run unit tests from an outside client, errors started to appear. This was to be expected because I was still using the openejb-client-3.0.1 assembly. When I updated the assembly to openejb-client-3.1.2, everything worked as expected (once again, great job). By updating this, I was certain that the Geronimo 2.2 tool was using the EJB 3.1 specification.
I then proceeded to try to use some of the new EJB 3.1 features. More specifically, the Singleton. I changed one of the annotations for my EJBs to Singleton and immediately got an error. I then checked the classpath to make sure I was pointing to the correct Geronimo installation. I was. In viewing the library assemblies in my project, I did not see anything that looked like a EJB 3.1 assembly underneath the Apache Geronimo 2.2 library. The only assembly that I found is titled: geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1.jar. I went to that assembly and opened up the jar file. I did see implementation classes for Stateful and Stateless but I did not see one for Singleton as I had expected. I do not know if this is a GEP issue or a Geronimo Server issue. In summary, it appears that the running server is using EJB 3.1 but when referencing the library during development time, it is only using the 3.0 specification. Can someone help me out with this?
Russell Collins
Sr. Software Engineer
McLane Advanced Technology
254.771.6419
"Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.
________________________________
CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.
Re: Geronimo - EJB3.1 - Eclipse
Posted by David Jencks <da...@yahoo.com>.
AFAIK geronimo 2.2 supports ejb 3.0, ejb 3.1 support is in progress
for geronimo 3.0. I know there are some features already implemented,
and I thought singletons were among the implemented features. However
you shouldn't expect full ejb 3.1 compliance from geronimo 2.2.
thanks
david jencks
On Jan 8, 2010, at 5:46 PM, Russell Collins wrote:
> Please bear with me as this may be long. I am trying to be as
> thorough as possible. I have upgraded my development environment
> and projects to use Geronimo 2.2. I was able to successfully
> replace the 2.1 server with the 2.2 server in my development
> environment. Everything compiled and went smooth from that
> standpoint (Good job guys). When trying to run unit tests from an
> outside client, errors started to appear. This was to be expected
> because I was still using the openejb-client-3.0.1 assembly. When I
> updated the assembly to openejb-client-3.1.2, everything worked as
> expected (once again, great job). By updating this, I was certain
> that the Geronimo 2.2 tool was using the EJB 3.1 specification.
>
> I then proceeded to try to use some of the new EJB 3.1 features.
> More specifically, the Singleton. I changed one of the annotations
> for my EJBs to Singleton and immediately got an error. I then
> checked the classpath to make sure I was pointing to the correct
> Geronimo installation. I was. In viewing the library assemblies in
> my project, I did not see anything that looked like a EJB 3.1
> assembly underneath the Apache Geronimo 2.2 library. The only
> assembly that I found is titled: geronimo-ejb_3.0_spec-1.0.1.jar. I
> went to that assembly and opened up the jar file. I did see
> implementation classes for Stateful and Stateless but I did not see
> one for Singleton as I had expected. I do not know if this is a GEP
> issue or a Geronimo Server issue. In summary, it appears that the
> running server is using EJB 3.1 but when referencing the library
> during development time, it is only using the 3.0 specification.
> Can someone help me out with this?
>
>
>
> Russell Collins
> Sr. Software Engineer
> McLane Advanced Technology
> 254.771.6419
>
>
> "Do or do not, there is no try." - Yoda
>
>
> CONFIDENTIALITY NOTICE: The information contained in this electronic
> mail (email) transmission (including attachments), is intended by
> MCLANE ADVANCED TECHNOLOGIES for the use of the named individual or
> entity to which it is addressed and may contain information that is
> privileged, confidential and/or protected as a trade secret. It is
> not intended for transmission to, or receipt by, any individual or
> entity other than the named addressee(s). If you have received this
> email in error, please delete it (including attachments) and any
> copies thereof without printing, copying or forwarding it, and
> notify the sender of the error by email reply immediately.