You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@spamassassin.apache.org by Josef Karliak <ka...@ajetaci.cz> on 2011/04/01 12:48:14 UTC
***SPAM-MEDIUM*** spamassassisn 3.3.x and message size setting lower
hi guys,
is it possible to decrease a message size from 51200 bytes to
100000kB ? In the local.cf file or in the postfix's master.cf ?
Thanks and regards
J.K.
--
Ma domena pouziva zabezpeceni a kontrolu SPF (www.openspf.org) a
DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP) . Pokud mate problemy s dorucenim emailu,
zacnete pouzivat metody overeni puvody emailu zminene vyse. Dekuji.
My domain use SPF (www.openspf.org) and DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP)
policy and check. If you've problem with sending emails to me, start
using email origin methods mentioned above. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
***SPAM-MEDIUM*** Re: ***SPAM-MEDIUM*** spamassassisn 3.3.x and message size setting lower
Posted by Josef Karliak <ka...@ajetaci.cz>.
Huh,
sorry, of course, 100kB :)
I tried that as a argument in the master.cf, but I placed it wrong
-> postfix server misconfiguration. So I wasn't sure and asked here.
Now all's all right. master.cf:
spamassassin unix - n n - - pipe
user=mail argv=/usr/bin/spamc -s 100000 -f -e /usr/sbin/sendmail
-oi -f ${sender} ${recipient}
Thank you for kicking to the right way.
Best regards
J.K.
Cituji RW <rw...@googlemail.com>:
> On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:48:14 +0200
> Josef Karliak <ka...@ajetaci.cz> wrote:
>
>> hi guys,
>> is it possible to decrease a message size from 51200 bytes to
>> 100000kB ? In the local.cf file or in the postfix's master.cf ?
>
> I presume you mean from 512kB to 100kB
>
> If you are using spamd with spamc, the maximumum message size is set
> as either as an argument to spamc or in spamc.conf. Spamc has the
> default of 512k so probably that's where the cutoff is currently
> applied.
>
--
Ma domena pouziva zabezpeceni a kontrolu SPF (www.openspf.org) a
DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP) . Pokud mate problemy s dorucenim emailu,
zacnete pouzivat metody overeni puvody emailu zminene vyse. Dekuji.
My domain use SPF (www.openspf.org) and DomainKeys/DKIM (with ADSP)
policy and check. If you've problem with sending emails to me, start
using email origin methods mentioned above. Thank you.
----------------------------------------------------------------
This message was sent using IMP, the Internet Messaging Program.
Re: ***SPAM-MEDIUM*** spamassassisn 3.3.x and message size setting
lower
Posted by RW <rw...@googlemail.com>.
On Fri, 01 Apr 2011 12:48:14 +0200
Josef Karliak <ka...@ajetaci.cz> wrote:
> hi guys,
> is it possible to decrease a message size from 51200 bytes to
> 100000kB ? In the local.cf file or in the postfix's master.cf ?
I presume you mean from 512kB to 100kB
If you are using spamd with spamc, the maximumum message size is set
as either as an argument to spamc or in spamc.conf. Spamc has the
default of 512k so probably that's where the cutoff is currently
applied.
Re: ***SPAM-MEDIUM*** spamassassisn 3.3.x and message size setting
lower
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
On Fri, 2011-04-01 at 20:46 +0200, Josef Karliak wrote:
> Hi,
> SPAM-MEDIUM is made by "virusbuster fom mail servers", that work in
> a sandwich mode. Postfix gets mail, send it into virusbuster,
> virusbuster scan it for spam and virus, take it back to postfix and
> postfix filter it thru spamassassisn. I'm aware about twice DKIM sign,
> I must look at it and RTFM to the milter's manual :)
Please keep the thread on-list -- I merely Cc'ed you directly against my
habit, just in case you stopped closely following the list, since your
initial question has been answered.
Anyway, quite frankly, I don't care how that Subject rewriting happens.
I merely meant to point out, that it looks rather bad to the recipient.
It sure did to me... ;)
> Cituji Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>:
> > You do realize that you are scanning your outbound mail, and incorrectly
> > brand your ham SPAM-MEDIUM, do you? See the Subject and the headers
> > below.
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}
Re: ***SPAM-MEDIUM*** spamassassisn 3.3.x and message size setting
lower
Posted by Karsten Bräckelmann <gu...@rudersport.de>.
You do realize that you are scanning your outbound mail, and incorrectly
brand your ham SPAM-MEDIUM, do you? See the Subject and the headers
below.
Also, you're DKIM signing twice, but that's nothing sticking out badly
to the recipient, unlike your Subject rewriting.
Received: by celer.ajetaci.cz (Postfix, from userid 8) id DAD78A8719;
Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
X-Spam-Checker-Version: Antispam Ajetaci
X-Spam-Level:
X-Spam-Report: No, score=-57.0 required=8.0 tests=BAYES_00,MG_WHITELIST,
spammedium autolearn=no version=3.2.5
X-Spam-Spam: NO
Received: from celer.ajetaci.cz (localhost [127.0.0.1])
by celer.ajetaci.cz (Postfix) with SMTP id 6D32DA8736
for <us...@spamassassin.apache.org>; Fri, 1 Apr 2011 12:48:15 +0200 (CEST)
--
char *t="\10pse\0r\0dtu\0.@ghno\x4e\xc8\x79\xf4\xab\x51\x8a\x10\xf4\xf4\xc4";
main(){ char h,m=h=*t++,*x=t+2*h,c,i,l=*x,s=0; for (i=0;i<l;i++){ i%8? c<<=1:
(c=*++x); c&128 && (s+=h); if (!(h>>=1)||!t[s+h]){ putchar(t[s]);h=m;s=0; }}}