You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to user@mahout.apache.org by zhao zhendong <zh...@gmail.com> on 2010/02/12 11:51:23 UTC
Re: Twitter Classification
Currently, the Pegasos Classifier supports multiple categories.
On Fri, Jan 22, 2010 at 6:55 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
> > The SGD and Pegasos classifiers would be ideal for this.
>
> For multiple categories? From a user perspective, classifying
> into multiple categories would be real sweet because it'd save
> time and be better than how CL behaves today (eg, uni-category).
> Also Solr/Lucene easily supports searching on items that are in
> multiple categories.
>
> On the geo front, it'd be handy to have a mobile app that
> attaches GPS coordinates to Tweets posted from one's PC. Seems
> like a useful app for Tweetdeck? It'd be brutally easy, there'd
> be a background app posting coordinates to a DB, that the
> Tweetdeck app gets one's latest coordinates from. This would
> help make the whole posting Tweets with locations a lot easier
> (eg, it'd happen automatically, instead of manually).
>
> On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 12:08 PM, Ted Dunning <te...@gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > The SGD and Pegasos classifiers would be ideal for this.
> >
> > The features should include the poster as well as the content. Geo and
> date
> > might be useful.
> >
> > On Thu, Jan 21, 2010 at 11:42 AM, Jason Rutherglen <
> > jason.rutherglen@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> Not sure if a Tweet could fall under multiple categories. We'd
> >> want to allow multiple classification systems, I'm thinking here
> >> of the Stanford log-linear classifier, among others. If this
> >> worked I'd personally want to start using it to because CL is
> >> too painful.
> >>
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ted Dunning, CTO
> > DeepDyve
> >
>
--
-------------------------------------------------------------
Zhen-Dong Zhao (Maxim)
<><<><><><><><><><>><><><><><>>>>>>
Department of Computer Science
School of Computing
National University of Singapore
>>>>>>><><><><><><><><<><>><><<<<<<
Re: Twitter Classification
Posted by Raviv Pavel <ra...@gigya-inc.com>.
Where are you taking the list of topics from ?
*
*
*--*Raviv
On Tue, Jan 17, 2012 at 12:05 AM, tdguest <ab...@querydynamics.com>wrote:
>
> Very Interesting discussion! Are there are any tweet classification
> systems existing right now? Would love to check them out!
>
> I have a site called http://www.tweetdynamics.com that categorizes
> tweets
> from users all over the world into topics. The classification is based on a
> semi-supervised classification method. Will be great if you can check this
> site out and send me feedback at - abhilasha@querydynamics.com
>
> Regards,
> Abhilasha
>
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Twitter-Classification-tp641884p3664574.html
> Sent from the Mahout User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
Re: Twitter Classification
Posted by tdguest <ab...@querydynamics.com>.
Very Interesting discussion! Are there are any tweet classification
systems existing right now? Would love to check them out!
I have a site called http://www.tweetdynamics.com that categorizes tweets
from users all over the world into topics. The classification is based on a
semi-supervised classification method. Will be great if you can check this
site out and send me feedback at - abhilasha@querydynamics.com
Regards,
Abhilasha
--
View this message in context: http://lucene.472066.n3.nabble.com/Twitter-Classification-tp641884p3664574.html
Sent from the Mahout User List mailing list archive at Nabble.com.