You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by kf...@collab.net on 2003/07/17 14:46:25 UTC
Re: Issue 787
"Andrew Premdas" <An...@man.ac.uk> writes:
> As there is a patch for this is their any chance it will be integrated into
> a more recent build than the beta e.g. 0.27
We're still in Alpha; Beta is what we're working toward :-).
Issue 787 is scheduled to be done before we reach Beta, that's why it
has the Beta milestone (it means "This issue must be resolved for the
named milestone to be reached").
> Also why is this issue seen as an enhancement. Surely the command line
> interface not working properly on a whole platform is a defect, and a pretty
> serious one at that.
It's not that serious a bug, because there are easy workarounds. The
difference between defect and enhancement can get kind of fuzzy,
yah...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
RE: Issue 787
Posted by Andrew Premdas <An...@man.ac.uk>.
Thanks for that, if someone does get a build together I'd be more than happy
to try it out on my box, if that will help.
All best
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]On
Behalf Of kfogel@collab.net
Sent: 17 July 2003 18:23
To: Andrew Premdas
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Issue 787
"Andrew Premdas" <An...@man.ac.uk> writes:
> Thanks for info Karl and clarification much appreciated. I do understand
the
> point about the issue being resolved before the beta. What I was wondering
> was since there is a two line patch that addresses this issue couldn't
this
> issue be resolved before 0.27 or 0.28.
The patch may be two lines, but testing that it will actually work
everywhere is another matter. If some committer with Windows
expertise and the right testing environment gets time to look at it,
then it will happen sooner.
You can't judge the complexity of a patch by counting its lines :-).
> Anyhow good luck moving on to betadom, and thanks for such a great
> application
Thanks!
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
Re: Issue 787
Posted by kf...@collab.net.
"Andrew Premdas" <An...@man.ac.uk> writes:
> Thanks for info Karl and clarification much appreciated. I do understand the
> point about the issue being resolved before the beta. What I was wondering
> was since there is a two line patch that addresses this issue couldn't this
> issue be resolved before 0.27 or 0.28.
The patch may be two lines, but testing that it will actually work
everywhere is another matter. If some committer with Windows
expertise and the right testing environment gets time to look at it,
then it will happen sooner.
You can't judge the complexity of a patch by counting its lines :-).
> Anyhow good luck moving on to betadom, and thanks for such a great
> application
Thanks!
-K
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org
RE: Issue 787
Posted by Andrew Premdas <An...@man.ac.uk>.
Thanks for info Karl and clarification much appreciated. I do understand the
point about the issue being resolved before the beta. What I was wondering
was since there is a two line patch that addresses this issue couldn't this
issue be resolved before 0.27 or 0.28.
I've not found easy workarounds, using Cygwin isn't that easy for unix no
knowledge peeps like myself :), and whilst I can easily apply the patch to
the source, building it is another matter entirely. If there are other
workarounds please let me know
Anyhow good luck moving on to betadom, and thanks for such a great
application
All best
Andrew
-----Original Message-----
From: kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net [mailto:kfogel@newton.ch.collab.net]On
Behalf Of kfogel@collab.net
Sent: 17 July 2003 15:46
To: Andrew Premdas
Cc: dev@subversion.tigris.org
Subject: Re: Issue 787
"Andrew Premdas" <An...@man.ac.uk> writes:
> As there is a patch for this is their any chance it will be integrated
into
> a more recent build than the beta e.g. 0.27
We're still in Alpha; Beta is what we're working toward :-).
Issue 787 is scheduled to be done before we reach Beta, that's why it
has the Beta milestone (it means "This issue must be resolved for the
named milestone to be reached").
> Also why is this issue seen as an enhancement. Surely the command line
> interface not working properly on a whole platform is a defect, and a
pretty
> serious one at that.
It's not that serious a bug, because there are easy workarounds. The
difference between defect and enhancement can get kind of fuzzy,
yah...
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@subversion.tigris.org
For additional commands, e-mail: dev-help@subversion.tigris.org