You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@lucene.apache.org by "Robert Muir (JIRA)" <ji...@apache.org> on 2009/09/25 17:37:16 UTC
[jira] Resolved: (LUCENE-1926) Back compat break with old next()
consumer API
[ https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1926?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:all-tabpanel ]
Robert Muir resolved LUCENE-1926.
---------------------------------
Resolution: Won't Fix
this behavior really was not guaranteed as explained by Uwe... sorry to waste your time with this :)
> Back compat break with old next() consumer API
> ----------------------------------------------
>
> Key: LUCENE-1926
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/LUCENE-1926
> Project: Lucene - Java
> Issue Type: Bug
> Components: Analysis
> Affects Versions: 2.9
> Reporter: Robert Muir
> Attachments: CaptureStateTestcase.java
>
>
> There is a bug that causes tokenstreams to return different results, depending upon whether they are consumed with the incrementToken() api or the next() api.
> I found this because the Solr analysis tool in the admin page uses the next() api, and i was seeing strange results.
> I've created a test case to show the problem. when calling captureState(), the current state is erased, but only when consuming with the next() api.
> If I consume with incrementToken(), things work.
> {code}
> State tempState = captureState(); // after we capture state here, things get strange.
> String right = termAtt.term(); // when using old consumer API, this value is wrong!!!!
> {code}
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: java-dev-unsubscribe@lucene.apache.org
For additional commands, e-mail: java-dev-help@lucene.apache.org