You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@subversion.apache.org by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> on 2010/09/07 22:56:13 UTC
Re: svn commit: r993544 - in /subversion/branches/javahl-ra/subversion/bindings/javahl:
native/ src/org/apache/subversion/javahl/ tests/org/apache/subversion/javahl/
I don't see a README.branch or whatever it should be named...
What is this branch for, and why is it not on trunk?
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 18:00, <hw...@apache.org> wrote:
> Author: hwright
> Date: Tue Sep 7 22:00:57 2010
> New Revision: 993544
>
> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993544&view=rev
> Log:
> On the javahl-ra branch:
>...
Re: svn commit: r993544 - in /subversion/branches/javahl-ra/subversion/bindings/javahl:
native/ src/org/apache/subversion/javahl/ tests/org/apache/subversion/javahl/
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 3:31 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I suspected as much, and simply wanted to confirm/prod.
No problem, thanks for the prod.
> Keeping "new" features from here-on-out on a branch is totally fine
> with me. Alternatively, placing them under an #ifdef like we did with
> the obliterate support works well, too. (and yes, I realize Java can't
> do that very easily...)
At some point, I've got some crazy ideas about a unified object model
and using a set of C++ bindings as the basis for all the swig stuff,
as well as JavaHL. That will * definitely* go on a branch, if only
for it's insanity and changes to the build system.
-Hyrum
Re: svn commit: r993544 - in /subversion/branches/javahl-ra/subversion/bindings/javahl:
native/ src/org/apache/subversion/javahl/ tests/org/apache/subversion/javahl/
Posted by Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com>.
I suspected as much, and simply wanted to confirm/prod.
Keeping "new" features from here-on-out on a branch is totally fine
with me. Alternatively, placing them under an #ifdef like we did with
the obliterate support works well, too. (and yes, I realize Java can't
do that very easily...)
Cheers,
-g
On Wed, Sep 8, 2010 at 13:58, Hyrum K. Wright
<hy...@mail.utexas.edu> wrote:
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> I don't see a README.branch or whatever it should be named...
>
> Thanks for the reminder, I've added one in r995168.
>
>> What is this branch for, and why is it not on trunk?
>
> The purpose is to expose some of the RA-layer APIs in JavaHL. The
> reason for a branch is that
> a) I'm unsure how complete this work will be, or its timeline for
> completion, meaning that
> b) I'm not comfortable doing it on trunk where it might be released
>
> Rather than add more stuff to the JavaHL bindings, and conflate what
> is already there with this new work, I'd rather have it stay on the
> branch until it feels "ready" or we branch 1.7.
>
> If there are arguments to the contrary, I'm happy to move it to trunk, however.
>
> -Hyrum
>
>> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 18:00, <hw...@apache.org> wrote:
>>> Author: hwright
>>> Date: Tue Sep 7 22:00:57 2010
>>> New Revision: 993544
>>>
>>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993544&view=rev
>>> Log:
>>> On the javahl-ra branch:
>>>...
>>
>
Re: svn commit: r993544 - in /subversion/branches/javahl-ra/subversion/bindings/javahl:
native/ src/org/apache/subversion/javahl/ tests/org/apache/subversion/javahl/
Posted by "Hyrum K. Wright" <hy...@mail.utexas.edu>.
On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 5:56 PM, Greg Stein <gs...@gmail.com> wrote:
> I don't see a README.branch or whatever it should be named...
Thanks for the reminder, I've added one in r995168.
> What is this branch for, and why is it not on trunk?
The purpose is to expose some of the RA-layer APIs in JavaHL. The
reason for a branch is that
a) I'm unsure how complete this work will be, or its timeline for
completion, meaning that
b) I'm not comfortable doing it on trunk where it might be released
Rather than add more stuff to the JavaHL bindings, and conflate what
is already there with this new work, I'd rather have it stay on the
branch until it feels "ready" or we branch 1.7.
If there are arguments to the contrary, I'm happy to move it to trunk, however.
-Hyrum
> On Tue, Sep 7, 2010 at 18:00, <hw...@apache.org> wrote:
>> Author: hwright
>> Date: Tue Sep 7 22:00:57 2010
>> New Revision: 993544
>>
>> URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?rev=993544&view=rev
>> Log:
>> On the javahl-ra branch:
>>...
>