[GitHub] [age-website] pdpotter commented on issue #52: [Discussion] Please give us your opinion on the reform of the age website

[GitBox <gi...@apache.org>]

pdpotter commented on issue #52:
URL: https://github.com/apache/age-website/issues/52#issuecomment-1220518436

   Nice job! The new website looks a lot more inviting.
   
   General remarks / questions:
   * For issues, Jira is mentioned, while in practice, I think currently most new issues by new members of the community are created in Github. Should Github be mentioned instead of Jira? Should one of the 2 issue trackers be closed in favor of the other?
   * For the code review process, currently a review process using e-mail and patches is described (https://github.com/apache/age-website/blob/new-web/src/pages/contribution/guide.md#code-review-process). Wouldn't it be easier to use Github Pull Requests instead of patches in e-mails?
   * Will the documentation pages be generated using Gatsby as well? (currently, the documentation link links to a non-existing page). I think a link to the documentation in the footer could be practical as well.
   * Some icons / elements are quite big, but of course that is a personal preference.
   
   I've encountered some typos and missing links as well, but I think it's best to address those in a PR once the general discussion has concluded.


-- 
This is an automated message from the Apache Git Service.
To respond to the message, please log on to GitHub and use the
URL above to go to the specific comment.

To unsubscribe, e-mail: dev-unsubscribe@age.apache.org

For queries about this service, please contact Infrastructure at:
users@infra.apache.org