Re: [admin] Important, please read

[Thierry Kormann <Th...@sophia.inria.fr>]

>     Ok, based on this I will not attempt to switch over to Linear sRGB
> in the filters.  I will also avoid adding support for Convolution (the
> two TODO things with my initials next to them) although I think the
> Convolution is relatively low risk overall, since it's affects are
> well contained.

I think we should wait for switching filter to Linear sRGB. Anyway, a new 
filter is welcome and easy to switch off (just remove the putBridge method call 
in the SVGBridgeContext constructor).

So in my opinion, you can start doing Convolution :)

Thierry.

-- 
Thierry Kormann
email: Thierry.Kormann@sophia.inria.fr  http://www.inria.fr/koala/tkormann/
Koala/Dyade/Bull @ INRIA - Sophia Antipolis

Re: [admin] Important, please read

[Thomas E Deweese <th...@kodak.com>]

>>>>> "VH" == Vincent Hardy <vi...@eng.sun.com> writes:

VH> If we do not have the linear change in, we will not pass any of
VH> the filter BEs as soon as Adobe puts the right reference images
VH> in. Not a huge issue, but I would rather pass the BEs for the
VH> filters we have.

VH> However, I would leave it to Thomas to evaluate the risks involved
VH> and decide if it can safely go in or not.

After offline discussions I will work on 

  1) background enable (we think we have an easy impl that is _very_ low
     risk for the code base, doesn't disturb any existing methods).
  
  2) FeBlend
  
  3) FeConvolve

Re: [admin] Important, please read

[Vincent Hardy <vi...@eng.sun.com>]

Thierry,

I we do not have the linear change in, we will not pass any of the 
filter BEs as soon as Adobe puts the right reference images in. Not
a huge issue, but I would rather pass the BEs for the filters we have.

However, I would leave it to Thomas to evaluate the risks involved
and decide if it can safely go in or not.

V.

Thierry Kormann wrote:
> 
> >     Ok, based on this I will not attempt to switch over to Linear sRGB
> > in the filters.  I will also avoid adding support for Convolution (the
> > two TODO things with my initials next to them) although I think the
> > Convolution is relatively low risk overall, since it's affects are
> > well contained.
> 
> I think we should wait for switching filter to Linear sRGB. Anyway, a new
> filter is welcome and easy to switch off (just remove the putBridge method call
> in the SVGBridgeContext constructor).
> 
> So in my opinion, you can start doing Convolution :)
> 
> Thierry.
> 
> --
> Thierry Kormann
> email: Thierry.Kormann@sophia.inria.fr  http://www.inria.fr/koala/tkormann/
> Koala/Dyade/Bull @ INRIA - Sophia Antipolis
> 
> ---------------------------------------------------------------------
> To unsubscribe, e-mail: batik-dev-unsubscribe@xml.apache.org
> For additional commands, e-mail: batik-dev-help@xml.apache.org