You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to dev@httpd.apache.org by Sunitha Kumar <su...@cisco.com> on 2001/09/07 21:33:33 UTC
solaris platforms supported
Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
did not find
any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
-solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
-solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
-solaris 2.6, on gcc2.952 version and above
thanks much,
--
Sunitha Kumar
http://www.cisco.com
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Justin Erenkrantz <je...@ebuilt.com>.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:33:33PM -0700, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
> did not find
> any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
>
> Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
>
> -solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
> -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
> -solaris 2.6, on gcc2.952 version and above
FWIW, I routinely use any combination of:
Solaris 7/8/9
Sparc/Intel
gcc-2.95.2/Forte 6.1
(My primary development box is Solaris 8/Intel gcc-2.95.2.)
And, if there is a bug on Solaris (other than fcntl being completely
useless at high load), I don't know about it. =-) -- justin
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Danek Duvall <dd...@eng.sun.com>.
On Fri, Sep 07, 2001 at 12:33:33PM -0700, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
>
> -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
I've used Forte 6.1 on Solaris 8 4/01 with success.
Danek
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Ian Holsman <ia...@cnet.com>.
On Fri, 2001-09-07 at 12:33, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
> did not find
> any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
>
> Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
>
> -solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
we use 2.953
> -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
> -solaris 2.6, on gcc2.952 version and above
>
> thanks much,
--
Ian Holsman IanH@cnet.com
Performance Measurement & Analysis
CNET Networks - (415) 364-8608
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Sander Temme <sc...@covalent.net>.
on 9/7/01 12:33 PM, Sunitha Kumar at sunithak@cisco.com wrote:
> -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
Yes, with a try'n buy of 6.1. Compiling went OK once I made it fully
impossilbe for the configure script to find gcc, but when I tried to
introduce optimization (OPTIM=...), the -O... also got passed to the linker
and apparently Sun's ld doesn't like this.
The objective was, to find out whether Sun's compiler could produce faster
code.
Did not investigate further. May get back to this in the future.
gcc: yes, all the time:
[byrd:sctemme] sctemme$gcc -v
Reading specs from /usr/local/lib/gcc-lib/sparc-sun-solaris2.8/2.95.2/specs
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
S.
--
Covalent Technologies sctemme@covalent.net
Engineering group Voice: (415) 536 5214
645 Howard St. Fax: (415) 536 5210
San Francisco CA 94105
PGP Fingerprint: 1E74 4E58 DFAC 2CF5 6A03 5531 AFB1 96AF B584 0AB1
=======================================================
This email message is for the sole use of the intended recipient(s) and may
contain confidential and privileged information. Any unauthorized review,
use, disclosure or distribution is prohibited. If you are not the intended
recipient, please contact the sender by reply email and destroy all copies
of the original message
=======================================================
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Pier Fumagalli <pi...@betaversion.org>.
"Jeff Trawick" <tr...@attglobal.net> wrote:
> Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com> writes:
>
>> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
>>
>>> Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
>>> did not find
>>> any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
>>>
>>> Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
>>>
>>> -solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
>>> -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
>>
>> I think either Justin or Jeff has a copy of Solaris 2.8, but I don't
>> remember for sure.
>
> I think both of us have access to Solaris 8, but the system I use on a
> regular basis has an older gcc (2.8.1).
>
> I use Solaris 8 Intel infrequently; I dunno what gcc it has (can't
> reboot right now).
All is good with both Solaris 8/x86 and 8/sparc with GCC 2.95.3.
BTW, if someone needs access to any of those setups, just let me know.
Pier
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Jeff Trawick <tr...@attglobal.net>.
Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com> writes:
> On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
>
> > Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
> > did not find
> > any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
> >
> > Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
> >
> > -solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
> > -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
>
> I think either Justin or Jeff has a copy of Solaris 2.8, but I don't
> remember for sure.
I think both of us have access to Solaris 8, but the system I use on a
regular basis has an older gcc (2.8.1).
I use Solaris 8 Intel infrequently; I dunno what gcc it has (can't
reboot right now).
--
Jeff Trawick | trawick@attglobal.net | PGP public key at web site:
http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/9289/
Born in Roswell... married an alien...
Re: solaris platforms supported
Posted by Cliff Woolley <cl...@yahoo.com>.
On Fri, 7 Sep 2001, Sunitha Kumar wrote:
> Sorry to bother the list with this question. I searched the FAQs, but
> did not find
> any info about solaris 2.8 platforms. So, here is the question.
>
> Has anybody compiled Apache 2.0 on,
>
> -solaris 2.8, on gcc2.952 version and above
> -solaris 2.8, on Forte 6.0
I think either Justin or Jeff has a copy of Solaris 2.8, but I don't
remember for sure.
> -solaris 2.6, on gcc2.952 version and above
I do this all the time:
SunOS cobra 5.6 Generic_105181-20 sun4u sparc SUNW,Ultra-60
gcc version 2.95.2 19991024 (release)
--Cliff
--------------------------------------------------------------
Cliff Woolley
cliffwoolley@yahoo.com
Charlottesville, VA