You are viewing a plain text version of this content. The canonical link for it is here.
Posted to users@jackrabbit.apache.org by Alex Leshinsky <al...@iname.com> on 2012/08/17 02:18:34 UTC
How to please
There’s an eerie feeling in me that this question has been asked and answered a million times.
Being in the grip of my decades long RDB programming, I can’t seem to decide what is the “JCR way” to deal with this:
I need to associate certain objects, lets call them “items”, with a classification named “category”. Categories have a hierarchical structure and sit in a tree outside items.
An item can be associated with any node in the Category tree.
I’m aware that David calls IDs evil. So, how do I model that without risking to burn in hell?
Many thanks!
Alex Leshinsky
Re: How to please
Posted by Fabián Mandelbaum <fm...@gmail.com>.
Dunno about pleasing lords of evils, but maybe you can model it with a
triplet: source > relationship > target. In your case source is the
"item", relationship is "classifiedUnder" and target is "category".
You'll have one of such triplet per item associated in a
classification.
Or with references, where your "classification" nodes have (virtual)
item children where each of those children is a reference to the real
"item" node.
Hope this helps.
On Thu, Aug 16, 2012 at 9:18 PM, Alex Leshinsky <al...@iname.com> wrote:
> There’s an eerie feeling in me that this question has been asked and answered a million times.
> Being in the grip of my decades long RDB programming, I can’t seem to decide what is the “JCR way” to deal with this:
>
> I need to associate certain objects, lets call them “items”, with a classification named “category”. Categories have a hierarchical structure and sit in a tree outside items.
> An item can be associated with any node in the Category tree.
>
> I’m aware that David calls IDs evil. So, how do I model that without risking to burn in hell?
> Many thanks!
> Alex Leshinsky
--
Fabián Mandelbaum
IS Engineer